1 Department of Psychology, University of Bath.
2 School of Social Sciences and Psychology, Western Sydney University.
Psychol Sci. 2018 Apr;29(4):623-634. doi: 10.1177/0956797617741107. Epub 2018 Feb 15.
Viral social media content has been heralded for its power to transform policy, but online responses are often derided as "slacktivism." This raises the questions of what drives viral communications and what is their effect on support for social change. We addressed these issues in relation to Twitter discussions about Aylan Kurdi, a child refugee who died en route to the European Union. We developed a longitudinal paradigm to analyze 41,253 tweets posted 1 week before the images of Aylan Kurdi emerged, the week they emerged, and 10 weeks afterward-at the time of the Paris terror attacks. Tweeting about death before the images emerged predicted tweeting about Aylan Kurdi, and this, sustained by discussion of harm and threat, predicted the expression of solidarity with refugees 10 weeks later. Results suggest that processes of normative conflict and communication can be intertwined in promoting support for social change.
病毒式社交媒体内容因其改变政策的力量而受到赞誉,但在线回应常常被嘲笑为“懈怠行动主义”。这就提出了一个问题,即是什么驱动了病毒式传播,以及它们对社会变革支持的影响是什么。我们针对有关艾兰·库尔迪(Aylan Kurdi)的 Twitter 讨论回答了这些问题,艾兰·库尔迪是一名在前往欧盟的途中死亡的儿童难民。我们开发了一种纵向范式来分析在 Aylan Kurdi 的图像出现前一周、出现时以及 10 周后(在巴黎恐怖袭击事件发生时)发布的 41,253 条推文。在图像出现之前发布有关死亡的推文预示着会发布有关 Aylan Kurdi 的推文,而这种推文在讨论伤害和威胁的情况下得以维持,预示着 10 周后对难民的声援。结果表明,规范冲突和沟通的过程可以相互交织,以促进对社会变革的支持。