• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急诊科高血压事件的长期心血管风险:一项基于人群的10年随访研究。

Long-term cardiovascular risk of hypertensive events in emergency department: A population-based 10-year follow-up study.

作者信息

Lee Sihyoung, You Chang-Youn, Kim Joonghee, Jo You Hwan, Ro Young Sun, Kang Si-Hyuck, Lee Heeyoung

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Bundang-gu, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea.

Laboratory of Emergency Medical Services, Seoul National University Hospital Biomedical Research Institute, Jongno-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2018 Feb 15;13(2):e0191738. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191738. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0191738
PMID:29447174
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5813929/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hypertension-related visits to the emergency department (ED) are increasing every year. Thus, ED could play a significant role in detecting hypertension and providing necessary interventions. However, it is not known whether a hypertensive event observed in the ED is an independent risk factor for future major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE).

METHODS

A population-based observational study was conducted using a nationally representative cohort that contained the claim data of 1 million individuals from 2002 to 2013. We included non-critical ED visits without any history of MACE, and compared the new occurrences of MACE according to the presence of hypertensive events using extended Cox regression model. The disease-modifying effect of a follow-up visit was assessed by analyzing the interaction between hypertensive event and follow-up visit.

RESULTS

Among 262,927 first non-critical ED visits during the study period (from 2004 to 2013), 6,243 (2.4%) visits were accompanied by a hypertensive event. The hypertensive event group had a higher risk of having a first MACE at 3 pre-specified intervals: 0-3 years (HR, 4.25; 95% CI, 3.83-4.71; P<0.001), 4-6 years (HR, 3.65; 95% CI, 3.14-4.24; P<0.001), and 7-10 years (HR, 3.20; 95% CI, 2.50-4.11; P<0.001). Follow-up visits showed significant disease-modifying effect at 2 intervals: 0-3 years (HR 0.65, 95% CI, 0.50-0.83) and 4-7 years (HR 0.68, 95% CI, 0.48-0.95).

CONCLUSIONS

A hypertensive event in the ED is an independent risk factor for MACE, and follow-up visits after the event can significantly modify the risk.

摘要

背景

每年因高血压前往急诊科(ED)就诊的人数都在增加。因此,急诊科在检测高血压和提供必要干预措施方面可以发挥重要作用。然而,尚不清楚在急诊科观察到的高血压事件是否是未来主要不良心血管事件(MACE)的独立危险因素。

方法

使用一个具有全国代表性的队列进行了一项基于人群的观察性研究,该队列包含了2002年至2013年100万人的索赔数据。我们纳入了没有任何MACE病史的非危急急诊科就诊病例,并使用扩展Cox回归模型根据是否存在高血压事件比较MACE的新发病例。通过分析高血压事件与随访就诊之间的相互作用来评估随访就诊的疾病改善效果。

结果

在研究期间(2004年至2013年)的262,927例首次非危急急诊科就诊病例中,6,243例(2.4%)就诊伴有高血压事件。高血压事件组在3个预先设定的时间段内首次发生MACE的风险更高:0至3年(风险比[HR],4.25;95%置信区间[CI],3.83至4.71;P<0.001),4至6年(HR,3.65;95%CI,3.14至4.24;P<0.001),以及7至10年(HR,3.20;95%CI,2.50至4.11;P<0.001)。随访就诊在2个时间段显示出显著的疾病改善效果:0至3年(HR 0.65,95%CI,0.50至0.83)和4至7年(HR 0.68,95%CI,0.48至0.95)。

结论

急诊科的高血压事件是MACE的独立危险因素,事件后的随访就诊可以显著改变风险。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86b8/5813929/9aad5621d46a/pone.0191738.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86b8/5813929/2852d82feb68/pone.0191738.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86b8/5813929/ac1ea8aa5651/pone.0191738.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86b8/5813929/9aad5621d46a/pone.0191738.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86b8/5813929/2852d82feb68/pone.0191738.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86b8/5813929/ac1ea8aa5651/pone.0191738.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86b8/5813929/9aad5621d46a/pone.0191738.g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Long-term cardiovascular risk of hypertensive events in emergency department: A population-based 10-year follow-up study.急诊科高血压事件的长期心血管风险:一项基于人群的10年随访研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 15;13(2):e0191738. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191738. eCollection 2018.
2
Risk of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events After Emergency Department Visits for Hypertensive Urgency.急诊就诊高血压急症后发生主要不良心血管事件的风险。
Hypertension. 2024 Jul;81(7):1592-1598. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.124.22885. Epub 2024 Apr 25.
3
Association between office visit intervals and long-term cardiovascular risk in hypertensive patients.高血压患者就诊间隔与长期心血管风险的关系。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2023 Aug;25(8):748-756. doi: 10.1111/jch.14698. Epub 2023 Jul 12.
4
Risk Factors for Recurrent Cardiovascular Events Before Age 65 Years or Within 2.5 Years of a Recent First Cardiovascular Event.65岁之前或近期首次心血管事件发生后2.5年内复发性心血管事件的危险因素。
Am J Cardiol. 2017 Jul 15;120(2):167-173. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.04.002. Epub 2017 Apr 27.
5
Epidemiology of emergency department visits for opioid overdose: a population-based study.因阿片类药物过量而到急诊科就诊的流行病学:一项基于人群的研究。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2014 Apr;89(4):462-71. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2013.12.008. Epub 2014 Mar 11.
6
Erectile dysfunction as a predictor of cardiovascular events and death in diabetic patients with angiographically proven asymptomatic coronary artery disease: a potential protective role for statins and 5-phosphodiesterase inhibitors.勃起功能障碍作为血管造影证实的无症状冠心病糖尿病患者心血管事件和死亡的预测指标:他汀类药物和5-磷酸二酯酶抑制剂的潜在保护作用。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 May 27;51(21):2040-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.10.069.
7
Plasma total testosterone and incident cardiovascular events in hypertensive patients.血浆总睾酮与高血压患者心血管事件的发生。
Am J Hypertens. 2013 Mar;26(3):373-81. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hps056. Epub 2013 Jan 7.
8
[The impact of hypertension history and baseline blood pressure levels on the cardiovascular outcomes in Chinese emergency atrial fibrillation patients].[高血压病史和基线血压水平对中国急诊房颤患者心血管结局的影响]
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2013 Nov;41(11):911-5.
9
Adverse prognostic significance of new diabetes in treated hypertensive subjects.治疗的高血压患者新发糖尿病的不良预后意义。
Hypertension. 2004 May;43(5):963-9. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000125726.92964.ab. Epub 2004 Mar 22.
10
Risk of hospitalizations/emergency department visits and treatment costs associated with initial maintenance therapy using fluticasone propionate 500 microg/salmeterol 50 microg compared with ipratropium for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in older adults.与异丙托溴铵相比,使用丙酸氟替卡松500微克/沙美特罗50微克进行初始维持治疗的老年人慢性阻塞性肺疾病住院/急诊就诊风险及治疗费用。
Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2008 Aug;6(3):138-46. doi: 10.1016/j.amjopharm.2008.08.005.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of motivated physicians and elderly patients with hypertension or type 2 diabetes mellitus in prepared communities on health behaviours and outcomes: A population-based PS matched retrospective cohort study during five-year follow-up period.动机性访谈对准备社区中的高血压或 2 型糖尿病老年患者的健康行为和结局的影响:一项基于人群的、PS 匹配的回顾性队列研究,随访时间为 5 年。
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 13;19(2):e0296834. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296834. eCollection 2024.
2
Hypertensive Crisis-Related Hospitalizations and Subsequent Major Adverse Cardiac Events in Young Adults with Cannabis Use Disorder: A Nationwide Analysis.与高血压危象相关的住院治疗和随后的主要不良心脏事件在患有大麻使用障碍的年轻成年人中:一项全国性分析。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Oct 16;58(10):1465. doi: 10.3390/medicina58101465.
3

本文引用的文献

1
A Population-Based Analysis of Outcomes in Patients With a Primary Diagnosis of Hypertension in the Emergency Department.急诊科原发性高血压患者结局的基于人群分析
Ann Emerg Med. 2016 Sep;68(3):258-267.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2016.04.060. Epub 2016 Jul 6.
2
Risk of Intracerebral Hemorrhage after Emergency Department Discharges for Hypertension.高血压患者急诊科出院后发生脑出血的风险
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2016 Jul;25(7):1683-1687. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2016.03.046. Epub 2016 Apr 8.
3
Cohort Profile: The National Health Insurance Service-National Sample Cohort (NHIS-NSC), South Korea.
A prospective longitudinal study with treated hypertensive patients in Northern Bangladesh (PREDIcT-HTN) to understand uncontrolled hypertension and adverse clinical events: A protocol for 5-years follow-up.一项针对孟加拉北部高血压患者的前瞻性纵向研究(PREDIcT-HTN),旨在了解未控制的高血压和不良临床事件:一项为期 5 年随访的研究方案。
PLoS One. 2022 May 31;17(5):e0269240. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269240. eCollection 2022.
4
Long-term cardiovascular risk prediction in the emergency department: a mixed-methods study protocol.急诊科的长期心血管风险预测:一项混合方法研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 8;12(4):e054311. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054311.
5
Risk of injury after emergency department visit for acute peripheral vertigo: a matched-cohort study.急性外周性眩晕急诊就诊后受伤的风险:一项匹配队列研究。
Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2020 Sep;7(3):176-182. doi: 10.15441/ceem.19.064. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
6
Hypertension prevalence but not control varies across the spectrum of risk in patients with atrial fibrillation: A RE-LY atrial fibrillation registry sub-study.高血压患病率而非控制率在房颤患者的风险谱中存在差异:RE-LY 房颤注册研究的子研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Jan 15;15(1):e0226259. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226259. eCollection 2020.
7
The Burden of Hypertension and Diabetes in an Emergency Department in Northern Tanzania.坦桑尼亚北部急诊科的高血压和糖尿病负担。
Ethn Dis. 2019 Oct 17;29(4):559-566. doi: 10.18865/ed.29.4.559. eCollection 2019 Fall.
8
Emergency Nursing Policy and Hypertension Awareness: an Integrative Review of the Literature.紧急护理政策与高血压认知:文献的综合回顾。
Curr Hypertens Rep. 2019 May 27;21(7):55. doi: 10.1007/s11906-019-0953-8.
9
The burden of hypertension in the emergency department and linkage to care: A prospective cohort study in Tanzania.急诊科高血压负担及与医疗衔接:坦桑尼亚前瞻性队列研究。
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 25;14(1):e0211287. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211287. eCollection 2019.
10
National trends in the emergency department management of adult patients with elevated blood pressure from 2005 to 2015.2005年至2015年成年高血压患者急诊科管理的全国趋势。
J Am Soc Hypertens. 2018 Dec;12(12):858-866. doi: 10.1016/j.jash.2018.09.010. Epub 2018 Oct 14.
队列简介:韩国国民健康保险服务国家样本队列(NHIS-NSC)
Int J Epidemiol. 2017 Apr 1;46(2):e15. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyv319.
4
Incidence of Hypertension-Related Emergency Department Visits in the United States, 2006 to 2012.2006年至2012年美国高血压相关急诊科就诊率
Am J Cardiol. 2015 Dec 1;116(11):1717-23. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.09.007. Epub 2015 Sep 10.
5
Adherence to Antihypertensive Therapy and Elevated Blood Pressure: Should We Consider the Use of Multiple Medications?抗高血压治疗依从性与血压升高:我们是否应考虑联合使用多种药物?
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 11;10(9):e0137451. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0137451. eCollection 2015.
6
Blood pressure treatment and outcomes in hypertensive patients without acute target organ damage: a retrospective cohort.无急性靶器官损害的高血压患者的血压治疗及结局:一项回顾性队列研究
Am J Emerg Med. 2015 Sep;33(9):1219-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2015.05.036. Epub 2015 May 30.
7
Frequency of serious outcomes in patients with hypertension as a chief complaint in the emergency department.以高血压为主诉的急诊科患者严重后果的发生率。
J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2013 Sep;113(9):664-8. doi: 10.7556/jaoa.2013.032.
8
Clinical policy: critical issues in the evaluation and management of adult patients in the emergency department with asymptomatic elevated blood pressure.临床政策:急诊科无症状性血压升高的成年患者评估和管理中的关键问题。
Ann Emerg Med. 2013 Jul;62(1):59-68. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2013.05.012.
9
National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2006 emergency department summary.国家医院门诊医疗护理调查:2006年急诊科总结
Natl Health Stat Report. 2008 Aug 6(7):1-38.
10
Hypertension in the ED: still an unrecognized problem.急诊科中的高血压:仍是一个未被认识到的问题。
Am J Emerg Med. 2008 Oct;26(8):913-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2007.11.024.