Department of Preventive Medicine, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Department of Applied Statistics, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 13;19(2):e0296834. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296834. eCollection 2024.
Effective chronic disease management requires the active participation of patients, communities, and physicians. The objective of this study was to estimate the effectiveness of the Community-based Registration and Management for elderly patients with Hypertension or Type 2 Diabetes mellitus Project (CRMHDP) by using motivated primary care physicians and patients supported by prepared communities, to utilise healthcare and health outcomes in four cities in South Korea. We conducted a propensity score-matched retrospective cohort study using 2010-2011 as the baseline years, alongside a follow-up period until 2015/2016, based on the Korean National Health Insurance database. Both a CRMHDP group (n = 46,865) and a control group (n = 93,730) were applied against healthcare utilisation and difference-in-differences estimations were performed. For the health outcome analysis, the intervention group (n = 27,242) and control group (n = 54,484) were analysed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazard regression. Results: The difference-in-differences estimation of the average annual clinic visits per person and the average annual days covered were 1.26 (95% confidence interval, 1.13-1.39) and 22.97 (95% CI, 20.91-25.03), respectively, between the intervention and control groups. The adjusted hazard ratio for death in the intervention group, compared to the control group, was 0.90 (95% CI, 0.86-0.93). For stroke and chronic renal failure, the adjusted hazard ratios for the intervention group compared to the control group were 0.94 (95% CI, 0.88-0.99) and 0.80 (95% CI 0.73-0.89), respectively. Our study suggests that for effective chronic disease management both elderly patients and physicians need to be motivated by community support.
有效的慢性病管理需要患者、社区和医生的积极参与。本研究的目的是通过使用有积极性的基层医疗保健医生和得到充分准备的社区所支持的患者,来评估以社区为基础的高血压或 2 型糖尿病老年患者登记和管理项目(CRMHDP)在韩国四个城市的利用医疗保健和健康结果的效果。我们利用韩国国家健康保险数据库,基于 2010-2011 年作为基线年,开展了一项倾向评分匹配的回顾性队列研究,并进行了随访,直到 2015/2016 年。该研究将 CMRHDP 组(n=46865)和对照组(n=93730)进行了对比,分析了医疗保健的使用情况,并进行了差值差异估计。对于健康结果分析,干预组(n=27242)和对照组(n=54484)采用 Kaplan-Meier 方法和 Cox 比例风险回归进行分析。结果:干预组和对照组之间,人均年就诊次数和年覆盖天数的差值估计分别为 1.26(95%置信区间,1.13-1.39)和 22.97(95%置信区间,20.91-25.03)。与对照组相比,干预组的死亡调整后风险比为 0.90(95%置信区间,0.86-0.93)。对于中风和慢性肾衰竭,与对照组相比,干预组的调整后风险比分别为 0.94(95%置信区间,0.88-0.99)和 0.80(95%置信区间,0.73-0.89)。本研究表明,为了进行有效的慢性病管理,患者和医生都需要得到社区的支持和激励。