• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

动机性访谈对准备社区中的高血压或 2 型糖尿病老年患者的健康行为和结局的影响:一项基于人群的、PS 匹配的回顾性队列研究,随访时间为 5 年。

Effect of motivated physicians and elderly patients with hypertension or type 2 diabetes mellitus in prepared communities on health behaviours and outcomes: A population-based PS matched retrospective cohort study during five-year follow-up period.

机构信息

Department of Preventive Medicine, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Department of Applied Statistics, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2024 Feb 13;19(2):e0296834. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296834. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0296834
PMID:38349922
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10863870/
Abstract

Effective chronic disease management requires the active participation of patients, communities, and physicians. The objective of this study was to estimate the effectiveness of the Community-based Registration and Management for elderly patients with Hypertension or Type 2 Diabetes mellitus Project (CRMHDP) by using motivated primary care physicians and patients supported by prepared communities, to utilise healthcare and health outcomes in four cities in South Korea. We conducted a propensity score-matched retrospective cohort study using 2010-2011 as the baseline years, alongside a follow-up period until 2015/2016, based on the Korean National Health Insurance database. Both a CRMHDP group (n = 46,865) and a control group (n = 93,730) were applied against healthcare utilisation and difference-in-differences estimations were performed. For the health outcome analysis, the intervention group (n = 27,242) and control group (n = 54,484) were analysed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazard regression. Results: The difference-in-differences estimation of the average annual clinic visits per person and the average annual days covered were 1.26 (95% confidence interval, 1.13-1.39) and 22.97 (95% CI, 20.91-25.03), respectively, between the intervention and control groups. The adjusted hazard ratio for death in the intervention group, compared to the control group, was 0.90 (95% CI, 0.86-0.93). For stroke and chronic renal failure, the adjusted hazard ratios for the intervention group compared to the control group were 0.94 (95% CI, 0.88-0.99) and 0.80 (95% CI 0.73-0.89), respectively. Our study suggests that for effective chronic disease management both elderly patients and physicians need to be motivated by community support.

摘要

有效的慢性病管理需要患者、社区和医生的积极参与。本研究的目的是通过使用有积极性的基层医疗保健医生和得到充分准备的社区所支持的患者,来评估以社区为基础的高血压或 2 型糖尿病老年患者登记和管理项目(CRMHDP)在韩国四个城市的利用医疗保健和健康结果的效果。我们利用韩国国家健康保险数据库,基于 2010-2011 年作为基线年,开展了一项倾向评分匹配的回顾性队列研究,并进行了随访,直到 2015/2016 年。该研究将 CMRHDP 组(n=46865)和对照组(n=93730)进行了对比,分析了医疗保健的使用情况,并进行了差值差异估计。对于健康结果分析,干预组(n=27242)和对照组(n=54484)采用 Kaplan-Meier 方法和 Cox 比例风险回归进行分析。结果:干预组和对照组之间,人均年就诊次数和年覆盖天数的差值估计分别为 1.26(95%置信区间,1.13-1.39)和 22.97(95%置信区间,20.91-25.03)。与对照组相比,干预组的死亡调整后风险比为 0.90(95%置信区间,0.86-0.93)。对于中风和慢性肾衰竭,与对照组相比,干预组的调整后风险比分别为 0.94(95%置信区间,0.88-0.99)和 0.80(95%置信区间,0.73-0.89)。本研究表明,为了进行有效的慢性病管理,患者和医生都需要得到社区的支持和激励。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f767/10863870/cae6a3ec4365/pone.0296834.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f767/10863870/747973003372/pone.0296834.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f767/10863870/bc34ef7473e0/pone.0296834.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f767/10863870/cae6a3ec4365/pone.0296834.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f767/10863870/747973003372/pone.0296834.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f767/10863870/bc34ef7473e0/pone.0296834.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f767/10863870/cae6a3ec4365/pone.0296834.g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Effect of motivated physicians and elderly patients with hypertension or type 2 diabetes mellitus in prepared communities on health behaviours and outcomes: A population-based PS matched retrospective cohort study during five-year follow-up period.动机性访谈对准备社区中的高血压或 2 型糖尿病老年患者的健康行为和结局的影响:一项基于人群的、PS 匹配的回顾性队列研究,随访时间为 5 年。
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 13;19(2):e0296834. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296834. eCollection 2024.
2
Effects of Community-Based Interventions on Medication Adherence and Hospitalization for Elderly Patients with Type 2 Diabetes at Primary Care Clinics in South Korea.社区干预对韩国基层医疗诊所 2 型老年糖尿病患者药物治疗依从性和住院的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 25;18(7):3396. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18073396.
3
Relationship between glycemic control and diabetes-related hospital costs in patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus.1型或2型糖尿病患者血糖控制与糖尿病相关住院费用之间的关系。
J Manag Care Pharm. 2010 May;16(4):264-75. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2010.16.4.264.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
Association of Uncontrolled Hypertension or Diabetes Mellitus With Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events and Mortality in South Korea: Population-Based Cohort Study.韩国未控制的高血压或糖尿病与主要不良心血管事件和死亡率的关联:基于人群的队列研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2023 Feb 3;9:e42190. doi: 10.2196/42190.
6
Restricted Mean Survival Time Analysis to Estimate SGLT2i-Associated Heterogeneous Treatment Effects on Primary and Secondary Prevention of Cardiorenal Outcomes in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes in Taiwan.限制平均生存时间分析估计 SGLT2i 在台湾 2 型糖尿病患者主要和次要心血管肾脏结局预防中的异质性治疗效果。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Dec 1;5(12):e2246928. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.46928.
7
A Mobile-Based Intervention for Glycemic Control in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: Retrospective, Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study.基于移动设备的 2 型糖尿病患者血糖控制干预:回顾性、倾向评分匹配队列研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Mar 11;8(3):e15390. doi: 10.2196/15390.
8
Endovascular stent grafting and open surgical replacement for chronic thoracic aortic aneurysms: a systematic review and prospective cohort study.血管内支架移植物和开放手术治疗慢性胸主动脉瘤:系统评价和前瞻性队列研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2022 Jan;26(6):1-166. doi: 10.3310/ABUT7744.
9
Increased dementia risk predominantly in diabetes mellitus rather than in hypertension or hyperlipidemia: a population-based cohort study.痴呆风险增加主要与糖尿病有关,而非高血压或高脂血症:一项基于人群的队列研究。
Alzheimers Res Ther. 2017 Feb 6;9(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s13195-017-0236-z.
10
Long-term effects of the multidisciplinary risk assessment and management program for patients with diabetes mellitus (RAMP-DM): a population-based cohort study.糖尿病患者多学科风险评估与管理项目(RAMP-DM)的长期影响:一项基于人群的队列研究。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2015 Aug 14;14:105. doi: 10.1186/s12933-015-0267-3.

本文引用的文献

1
Disease Management Program in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, long-term results of the early and established program cohort: A population-based retrospective cohort study.2 型糖尿病患者疾病管理计划:早期和已建立计划队列的长期结果:一项基于人群的回顾性队列研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 13;17(12):e0279090. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279090. eCollection 2022.
2
Inclusive Aging in Korea: Eradicating Senior Poverty.韩国的包容性老龄化:消除老年人贫困。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 14;19(4):2121. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19042121.
3
Estimating proportion of days covered (PDC) using real-world online medicine suppliers' datasets.
使用真实世界在线药品供应商数据集估算覆盖天数比例(PDC)。
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2021 Dec 29;14(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s40545-021-00385-w.
4
Effects of Community-Based Interventions on Medication Adherence and Hospitalization for Elderly Patients with Type 2 Diabetes at Primary Care Clinics in South Korea.社区干预对韩国基层医疗诊所 2 型老年糖尿病患者药物治疗依从性和住院的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 25;18(7):3396. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18073396.
5
Patient preferences for medication adherence financial incentive structures: A discrete choice experiment.患者对药物依从性经济激励结构的偏好:一项离散选择实验。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2021 Oct;17(10):1800-1809. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2021.01.018. Epub 2021 Feb 5.
6
Study of hospitalization and mortality in Korean diabetic patients using the diabetes complications severity index.使用糖尿病并发症严重程度指数研究韩国糖尿病患者的住院和死亡率。
BMC Endocr Disord. 2020 Aug 10;20(1):122. doi: 10.1186/s12902-020-00605-5.
7
Do physician incentives increase patient medication adherence?医生激励措施是否能提高患者的用药依从性?
Health Serv Res. 2020 Aug;55(4):503-511. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13322.
8
A pay for performance scheme in primary care: Meta-synthesis of qualitative studies on the provider experiences of the quality and outcomes framework in the UK.初级保健中的按绩效付费计划:英国质量和结果框架下对提供者体验的定性研究的元综合。
BMC Fam Pract. 2020 Jul 13;21(1):142. doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-01208-8.
9
Changing health behaviors using financial incentives: a review from behavioral economics.利用经济激励改变健康行为:行为经济学的综述。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Aug 7;19(1):1059. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7407-8.
10
Balance diagnostics after propensity score matching.倾向得分匹配后的平衡诊断
Ann Transl Med. 2019 Jan;7(1):16. doi: 10.21037/atm.2018.12.10.