Department of Family Medicine, Healthcare System Gangnam Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
Nigel Gray Fellowship Group, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Australia.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2018 Apr 1;185:142-148. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2017.12.018. Epub 2018 Feb 10.
This study examined the prevalence and correlates of (1) perceived social acceptability of personal vaporizer (PV)/e-cigarette use, and (2) reported vaping in public and private places, in the UK and Australia with different regulatory environments for PVs.
Data analyzed come from 2849 smokers and recent ex-smokers in the UK and Australia who participated in the 2014 wave of the International Tobacco Control Survey.
UK respondents were more likely to think vaping is socially acceptable than Australians (56.4% vs. 27.9%; p < 0.001). Having quit smoking, observing vaping in smoke-free (SF) public places, and believing vaping is less harmful than smoking was all significantly associated with greater perceived social acceptability of vaping in both countries. However, vaping status and that of friends and family were more influential in Australia than in the UK. Vaping was reported as much more common in private, than public, settings in both countries. UK vapers were more likely to report vaping in SF public places (OR = 2.66; 95% CI = 1.5-4.7; p < 0.01) and at home (OR = 2.44; 95% CI = 1.5-3.9; p < 0.001), but not in their car when controlling for demographic factors and vaping and smoking status.
The acceptability of vaping was greater among those who were more exposed to vaping and not just among those with some personal experience of vaping, suggesting no strong social barriers to increased use. Vaping in SF public places was less common than in homes, and both were more common in the UK than in Australia, suggesting some social constraints on use, particularly in Australia.
本研究调查了在英国和澳大利亚(这两个地区对个人蒸气吸入器/电子烟的监管环境不同),人们对个人蒸气吸入器/电子烟使用的感知社会可接受性,以及(2)在公共和私人场所报告的蒸气吸入器使用情况,其流行率及其相关因素。
本分析所使用的数据来自于 2014 年英国和澳大利亚参加国际烟草控制调查的 2849 名吸烟者和近期戒烟者。
与澳大利亚受访者相比,英国受访者更认为蒸气吸入器的使用是被社会接受的(56.4%对 27.9%;p<0.001)。在两国中,已经戒烟、观察到在无烟(SF)公共场所吸蒸气、以及认为蒸气吸入器的危害小于吸烟,这三者均与对蒸气吸入器使用的感知社会可接受性呈显著正相关。然而,蒸气吸入器的使用状况及其在朋友和家人中的流行率在澳大利亚的影响力要大于在英国的影响力。在两国中,蒸气吸入器在私人场所的使用比在公共场所有更频繁报告。与控制人口统计学因素、蒸气吸入器和吸烟状况后相比,英国的蒸气吸入器使用者更有可能报告在 SF 公共场所(比值比[OR] = 2.66;95%置信区间[CI] = 1.5-4.7;p<0.01)和在家里(OR = 2.44;95% CI = 1.5-3.9;p<0.001)吸蒸气,但不在他们的车内吸蒸气。
在那些更易接触到蒸气吸入器,而非仅个人有一些蒸气吸入器使用经验的人中,蒸气吸入器的可接受性更高,这表明使用蒸气吸入器不会有很强的社会障碍。在无烟公共场所吸蒸气的情况比在家里吸蒸气的情况更少见,而且在英国比在澳大利亚更常见,这表明在使用方面存在一些社会限制,特别是在澳大利亚。