Agence de Médecine Préventive, Paris, France.
Division Prévention et Lutte contre la Maladie (DPLM), Ministère de la santé Publique et de l'Hygiène Publique Conakry, Conakry, Guinea.
Infect Dis Poverty. 2018 Feb 15;7(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s40249-018-0393-8.
Cholera is endemic in Guinea, having suffered consecutive outbreaks from 2004 to 2008 followed by a lull until the 2012 epidemic. Here we describe the temporal-spatial and behavioural characteristics of cholera cases in Conakry during a three-year period, including the large-scale 2012 epidemic.
We used the national and African Cholera Surveillance Network (Africhol) surveillance data collected from every cholera treatment centre in Conakry city from August 2011 to December 2013. The prevalence of suspect and confirmed cholera cases, the case fatality ratio (CFR), and the factors associated with suspected cholera were described according to three periods: pre-epidemic (A), epidemic 2012 (B) and post epidemic (C). Weekly attack rates and temporal-spatial clustering were calculated at municipality level for period B. Cholera was confirmed by culture at the cholera national reference laboratory.
A total of 4559 suspect cases were reported: 66, 4437, and 66 suspect cases in periods A, B and C, respectively. Among the 204 suspect cases with culture results available, 6%, 60%, and 70% were confirmed in periods A, B, and C, respectively. With 0.3%, the CFR was significantly lower in period B than in periods A (7.6%) and C (7.1%). The overall attack rate was 0.28% in period B, ranging from 0.17% to 0.31% across municipalities. Concomitantly, a cluster of cases was identified in two districts in the northern part of Conakry. At 14%, rice water stools were less frequent in period A than in period B and C (78% and 84%). Dehydration (31% vs 94% and 89%) and coma (0.4% vs 3.1% and 2.9%) were lower during period B than in periods A and C. The treatment of drinking water was less frequent in period A, while there were more reports of recent travel in period C.
The epidemic dynamic and the sociological description of suspect cases before, during, and after the large-scale epidemic revealed that the Vibrio cholerae was already present before the epidemic. However, it appeared that infected individuals reacted differently in terms of disease severity as well as their access to treated water and travel habits. Such an in-depth description of cholera epidemics should be systematically carried out in cholera endemic settings in order to prioritize higher risk areas, identify transmission factors, and optimize preventive interventions.
霍乱在几内亚流行,从 2004 年到 2008 年连续爆发,随后到 2012 年疫情爆发前一直处于平静期。在此,我们描述了 2012 年大规模疫情爆发前、期间和之后三年期间在科纳克里市的霍乱病例的时空和行为特征。
我们使用了从 2011 年 8 月至 2013 年 12 月期间在科纳克里市每个霍乱治疗中心收集的国家和非洲霍乱监测网络(Africhol)监测数据。根据三个时期描述了疑似和确诊霍乱病例的流行率、病死率(CFR)以及与疑似霍乱相关的因素:流行前(A)、2012 年流行期(B)和流行后期(C)。B 期时,按市级别计算每周攻击率和时空聚集情况。霍乱在国家霍乱参考实验室通过培养得到确认。
共报告了 4559 例疑似病例:A 期分别为 66、4437 和 66 例疑似病例,B 期和 C 期分别为 6%、60%和 70%。在 204 例有培养结果的疑似病例中,A、B 和 C 期分别有 6%、60%和 70%得到确认。B 期的 CFR 明显低于 A 期(7.6%)和 C 期(7.1%),为 0.3%。B 期的总攻击率为 0.28%,各市之间的范围为 0.17%至 0.31%。同时,在科纳克里北部的两个区发现了一个病例群。在 A 期,米汤样大便的频率为 14%,低于 B 期(78%)和 C 期(84%)。B 期的脱水(31%)和昏迷(0.4%)的发生率低于 A 期和 C 期(94%和 89%)。在 A 期,饮用水治疗的报告较少,而在 C 期,近期旅行的报告较多。
大规模疫情前、期间和之后的流行动态和疑似病例的社会学描述表明,在疫情爆发前霍乱弧菌就已经存在。然而,似乎感染个体在疾病严重程度以及获得治疗用水和旅行习惯方面的反应不同。在霍乱流行地区应系统地进行此类霍乱疫情的详细描述,以便确定更高风险地区,识别传播因素,并优化预防干预措施。