Suppr超能文献

在评估医学生掌握评估和处理心血管及呼吸系统疾病技能的时间和信心方面,强化模拟与传统教学对照——一项伪随机试验

Intensive simulation versus control in the assessment of time to skill competency and confidence of medical students to assess and manage cardiovascular and respiratory conditions-a pseudo-randomised trial.

作者信息

Cunningham Neil J, O'Brien Robert, Weiland Tracey, van Dijk Julian, Dilley Stuart

机构信息

1St Vincent's Clinical Education and Simulation Centre, St. Vincent's Hospital, PO Box 2900, 41 Victoria Parade, Fitzroy, Melbourne, 3065 Australia.

2Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.

出版信息

Adv Simul (Lond). 2016 May 30;1:15. doi: 10.1186/s41077-016-0016-z. eCollection 2016.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Clinical Placement Enhancement Program (CPEP) is a simulation course for medical students learning the core topics of cardiovascular and respiratory medicine, incorporating patient safety and professionalism teaching and based on adult learning principles and proven educational theory. The aims of this study are to assess whether the CPEP delivered at the beginning of a clinical rotation would result in competency outcomes that are at least equivalent to those achieved through a standard 6-week programme and whether this programme would increase student confidence levels in assessing and managing patients with cardiovascular and respiratory conditions.

METHODS

This was a pseudo-randomised control trial between two groups of medical students from one clinical school. The intervention group participated in CPEP, a 4-day immersive simulation course, in the first week of their cardiac and respiratory medicine clinical rotation. The control group participants attended the normal programme of the 6-week cardiovascular and respiratory medicine clinical rotation. The programme and student competence was assessed using Observed Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCEs) and self-reported confidence surveys.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in OSCE scoring between the intervention group (examined in week one of their clinical rotation following CPEP) and the control group (examined at the end of their full clinical rotation). Students exposed to CPEP started their clinical rotation with confidence levels similar to those reported by the control group at the end of their rotation. Confidence levels of CPEP students were higher at the end of the rotation compared to those of the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on OSCE results, immersion into a 4-day simulation-based teaching programme at the start of a clinical rotation resulted in skill competency levels that were equivalent to those obtained after a full clinical rotation of 6 weeks. CPEP improved students' confidence levels in the assessment and management of patients presenting with cardiovascular and respiratory conditions. Simulation utilised in courses such as CPEP has the potential to enhance the overall learning experience in medical school clinical rotations.

摘要

背景

临床实习强化项目(CPEP)是一门针对医学生的模拟课程,用于教授心血管和呼吸医学的核心主题,融入了患者安全和职业素养教学,基于成人学习原则和经过验证的教育理论。本研究的目的是评估在临床轮转开始时开展的CPEP是否能产生至少与标准6周课程相当的能力结果,以及该项目是否能提高学生评估和管理心血管及呼吸疾病患者的信心水平。

方法

这是一项对来自同一临床学院的两组医学生进行的准随机对照试验。干预组在心脏和呼吸医学临床轮转的第一周参加了为期4天的沉浸式模拟课程CPEP。对照组参与者参加为期6周的心血管和呼吸医学临床轮转的常规课程。使用客观结构化临床考试(OSCEs)和自我报告的信心调查来评估课程和学生能力。

结果

干预组(在参加CPEP后的临床轮转第一周接受检查)和对照组(在整个临床轮转结束时接受检查)在OSCE评分上没有显著差异。接触CPEP的学生开始临床轮转时的信心水平与对照组轮转结束时报告的信心水平相似。与对照组相比,CPEP学生在轮转结束时的信心水平更高。

结论

根据OSCE结果,在临床轮转开始时融入为期4天的基于模拟的教学项目所产生的技能能力水平与6周全临床轮转后获得的水平相当。CPEP提高了学生评估和管理心血管及呼吸疾病患者的信心水平。在CPEP等课程中使用模拟有潜力提升医学院临床轮转的整体学习体验。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/65a3/5806281/897ff06c224c/41077_2016_16_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验