Dieckmann Peter, Patterson Mary, Lahlou Saadi, Mesman Jessica, Nyström Patrik, Krage Ralf
1Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation (CAMES), Center for Human Resources, Capital Region of Denmark, Herlev Hospital, 25. Floor, Herlev Ringvej 75, DK-2730 Herlev, Denmark.
2Children's National Medical Center, 111 Michigan Ave NW, Washington, DC, 20010 USA.
Adv Simul (Lond). 2017 Oct 31;2:21. doi: 10.1186/s41077-017-0054-1. eCollection 2017.
Simulation is traditionally used to reduce errors and their negative consequences. But according to modern safety theories, this focus overlooks the learning potential of the positive performance, which is much more common than errors. Therefore, a supplementary approach to simulation is needed to unfold its full potential. In our commentary, we describe the (LFS) approach to simulation and debriefing. Drawing on several theoretical frameworks, we suggest supplementing the widespread deficit-oriented, corrective approach to simulation with an approach that focusses on systematically understanding how good performance is produced in frequent (mundane) simulation scenarios. We advocate to investigate and optimize human activity based on the connected layers of any setting: the embodied competences of the healthcare professionals, the social and organizational rules that guide their actions, and the material aspects of the setting. We discuss implications of these theoretical perspectives for the design and conduct of simulation scenarios, post-simulation debriefings, and faculty development programs.
传统上,模拟用于减少错误及其负面后果。但根据现代安全理论,这种关注点忽视了积极表现的学习潜力,而积极表现比错误更为常见。因此,需要一种补充方法来充分发挥模拟的潜力。在我们的评论中,我们描述了模拟与总结汇报的(LFS)方法。借鉴几个理论框架,我们建议用一种侧重于系统理解在频繁(日常)模拟场景中如何产生良好表现的方法,来补充广泛存在的以缺陷为导向的模拟纠正方法。我们主张基于任何场景的相关层面来研究和优化人类活动:医疗专业人员的具体能力、指导其行动的社会和组织规则,以及场景的物质方面。我们讨论了这些理论观点对模拟场景的设计与实施、模拟后总结汇报以及教员发展项目的影响。