Suppr超能文献

强化抗逆转录病毒疗法对氯吡格雷和普拉格雷活性代谢物药代动力学和疗效的影响。

Impact of Boosted Antiretroviral Therapy on the Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy of Clopidogrel and Prasugrel Active Metabolites.

机构信息

Division of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Geneva University Hospitals, Rue Gabrielle Perret-Gentil 4, 1211, Geneva, Switzerland.

School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Geneva and Lausanne Universities, Geneva, Switzerland.

出版信息

Clin Pharmacokinet. 2018 Oct;57(10):1347-1354. doi: 10.1007/s40262-018-0637-6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Prasugrel and clopidogrel are inhibitors of the ADP-PY platelet receptor used in acute coronary syndrome patients. They require bioactivation via isoenzymes such as cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4, CYP2C19 and CYP2B6. Ritonavir and cobicistat are potent CYP3A inhibitors, prescribed as pharmacokinetic (PK) enhancers in the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection.

METHODS

In this study, the impact of boosted antiretroviral therapies (ARTs) on the PK of clopidogrel and prasugrel active metabolites (AMs), and on the efficacy of prasugrel and clopidogrel, were evaluated in a randomized crossover clinical trial.

RESULTS

A significantly lower exposure to clopidogrel AM [3.2-fold lower area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) and maximum plasma concentration (C)] and prasugrel AM (2.1-fold and 1.7-fold lower AUC and C) were demonstrated in HIV-infected patients treated with boosted ARTs compared with healthy controls; however, a differential impact was observed on platelet inhibition between clopidogrel and prasugrel. Clopidogrel 300 mg induced adequate (although modest) platelet inhibition in all healthy subjects, while platelet inhibition was insufficient in 44% of HIV patients. On the contrary, prasugrel 60 mg induced a potent platelet inhibition in both healthy and HIV-infected subjects.

CONCLUSION

Prasugrel appears to remain an adequate antiplatelet agent in HIV-infected patients and could be preferred to clopidogrel in this context, regardless of the metabolic interaction and inhibition of its bioactivation pathways.

摘要

背景与目的

普拉格雷和氯吡格雷是用于急性冠脉综合征患者的 ADP-PY 血小板受体抑制剂。它们需要通过细胞色素 P450(CYP)3A4、CYP2C19 和 CYP2B6 等同工酶进行生物激活。利托那韦和考比司他是强效 CYP3A 抑制剂,被规定为治疗人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)感染的药代动力学(PK)增强剂。

方法

在这项研究中,通过随机交叉临床试验评估了强化抗逆转录病毒疗法(ART)对氯吡格雷和普拉格雷活性代谢物(AM)的 PK 以及普拉格雷和氯吡格雷疗效的影响。

结果

与健康对照组相比,接受强化 ART 治疗的 HIV 感染患者的氯吡格雷 AM [3.2 倍的 AUC 和 C 下面积(AUC)和最大血浆浓度(C)]和普拉格雷 AM(2.1 倍和 1.7 倍 AUC 和 C)的暴露明显降低;然而,在氯吡格雷和普拉格雷的血小板抑制方面观察到了不同的影响。氯吡格雷 300mg 可在所有健康受试者中诱导充分(尽管适度)的血小板抑制,而在 44%的 HIV 患者中血小板抑制不足。相反,普拉格雷 60mg 可在健康和 HIV 感染受试者中诱导强效的血小板抑制。

结论

普拉格雷似乎仍然是 HIV 感染患者中一种充分的抗血小板药物,并且可以在这种情况下优先于氯吡格雷,无论代谢相互作用及其生物激活途径的抑制情况如何。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验