Graw Jan A, Eymann Katja, Kork Felix, Zoremba Martin, Burchard Rene
Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Department of Anesthesiology and Operative Intensive Care Medicine (CCM, CVK), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Feb 17;18(1):122. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-2928-x.
Due to an increasing demand in health care services plans to substitute selective physician-conducted medical activities have become attractive. Because administration of a blood transfusion is a highly standardized procedure, it might be evaluated if obtaining a patient's consent for a blood transfusion can be delegated to allied healthcare professionals. Physicians and patients perceive risks of transfusions differently. However, it is unknown how allied healthcare professionals perceive risks of transfusion-associated adverse events.
Patients (n = 506) and allied healthcare professionals (n = 185) of an academic teaching hospital were asked to quantify their concerns about transfusions including five predefined transfusion-associated risks and their incidences.
Blood transfusions were considered to be generally harmful by 10.9% of patients and 14.6% of caregivers (P = 0.180). Among all surveyed patients, 36.8% were worried about infection-transmissions (caregivers: 27.6%; P = 0.024). Compared to 5.4% of caregivers, 13.6% of patients believed infection-transmission was a frequent complication (P = 0.003). Caregivers ranked the risks of receiving an AB0-mismatch transfusion (caregivers: 29.7% vs.
19.2%, P = 0.003) or a transfusion-associated allergic reaction (caregivers: 17.3% vs.
11.1%, P = 0.030) significantly higher than patients and were aware of the high incidence of transfusion-associated fever (caregivers: 17.8% vs.
8.3%, P < 0.001).
A significant part of interviewees perceived transfusions as a general health hazard. Patients perceived infection-transmissions as the most frequent and greatest transfusion-associated threat while caregivers focused on fatal AB0-mismatch transfusions and allergic reactions. Understanding the patients' main concerns about blood transfusions and considering that these concerns might differ from the view of healthcare professionals might improve the process of shared decision making.
由于医疗保健服务需求不断增加,替代部分由医生主导的医疗活动的计划变得颇具吸引力。因为输血管理是一个高度标准化的程序,所以评估将获取患者输血同意书的工作委托给专职医疗人员是否可行是有意义的。医生和患者对输血风险的认知不同。然而,尚不清楚专职医疗人员如何看待输血相关不良事件的风险。
一所教学医院的患者(n = 506)和专职医疗人员(n = 185)被要求量化他们对输血的担忧,包括五种预先定义的输血相关风险及其发生率。
10.9%的患者和14.6%的护理人员认为输血总体上有害(P = 0.180)。在所有接受调查的患者中,36.8%担心感染传播(护理人员:27.6%;P = 0.024)。与5.4%的护理人员相比,13.6%的患者认为感染传播是常见并发症(P = 0.003)。护理人员认为接受ABO血型不匹配输血(护理人员:29.7%对患者:19.2%,P = 0.003)或输血相关过敏反应(护理人员:17.3%对患者:11.1%,P = 0.030)的风险显著高于患者,且知晓输血相关发热的高发生率(护理人员:17.8%对患者:8.3%,P < 0.001)。
相当一部分受访者认为输血对健康有总体危害。患者认为感染传播是最常见且最大的输血相关威胁,而护理人员则关注致命的ABO血型不匹配输血和过敏反应。了解患者对输血的主要担忧,并认识到这些担忧可能与医疗专业人员的观点不同,可能会改善共同决策的过程。