• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阿哌沙班或利伐沙班与华法林用于导管直接溶栓后亚大面积肺栓塞治疗的比较

Apixaban or Rivaroxaban Versus Warfarin for Treatment of Submassive Pulmonary Embolism After Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis.

作者信息

Groetzinger Lara M, Miller Taylor J, Rivosecchi Ryan M, Smith Roy E, Gladwin Mark T, Rivera-Lebron Belinda N

机构信息

1 Medical Intensive Care Unit, Department of Pharmacy, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center-Presbyterian, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

2 Cardiology, Department of Pharmacy, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center-Presbyterian, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

出版信息

Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2018 Sep;24(6):908-913. doi: 10.1177/1076029618755311. Epub 2018 Feb 18.

DOI:10.1177/1076029618755311
PMID:29455567
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6714714/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Little data exist on the use of direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) factor Xa inhibitors for submassive pulmonary embolism (PE) after catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT). The objective of this evaluation was to determine whether the transition from parenteral anticoagulation to DOACs for submassive PE after CDT would decrease hospital length of stay (LOS) compared to warfarin.

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients diagnosed with submassive PE who underwent CDT was conducted from January 1, 2012, to February 28, 2017. Hospital LOS and major and minor bleeding events were recorded during hospitalization and at 90 days.

RESULTS

Sixty-two patients met the inclusion criteria, 36 in warfarin group and 26 in the DOAC group. Overall, patients receiving rivaroxaban or apixaban had a shorter median hospital LOS compared to warfarin (4.0 vs 6.1 days, P = .002). In the multivariate regression analysis, administration of DOAC was an independent predictor of decreased hospital LOS, β: -2.1, 95% confidence interval (-3.5 to -0.7).

CONCLUSION

Among patients with submassive PE, initiation of a DOAC shortly after CDT may result in a decreased hospital LOS compared to parenterally bridged warfarin.

摘要

背景

关于导管直接溶栓(CDT)后使用直接口服抗凝剂(DOAC)Xa因子抑制剂治疗次大面积肺栓塞(PE)的数据较少。本评估的目的是确定与华法林相比,CDT后次大面积PE从肠外抗凝过渡到DOAC是否会缩短住院时间(LOS)。

方法

对2012年1月1日至2017年2月28日期间诊断为次大面积PE并接受CDT的患者进行回顾性研究。记录住院期间及90天时的住院LOS以及严重和轻微出血事件。

结果

62例患者符合纳入标准,华法林组36例,DOAC组26例。总体而言,与华法林相比,接受利伐沙班或阿哌沙班的患者中位住院LOS较短(4.0天对6.1天,P = .002)。在多变量回归分析中,使用DOAC是住院LOS降低的独立预测因素,β:-2.1,95%置信区间(-3.5至-0.7)。

结论

在次大面积PE患者中,与肠外桥接华法林相比,CDT后不久开始使用DOAC可能会缩短住院LOS。

相似文献

1
Apixaban or Rivaroxaban Versus Warfarin for Treatment of Submassive Pulmonary Embolism After Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis.阿哌沙班或利伐沙班与华法林用于导管直接溶栓后亚大面积肺栓塞治疗的比较
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2018 Sep;24(6):908-913. doi: 10.1177/1076029618755311. Epub 2018 Feb 18.
2
Rivaroxaban versus Heparin Bridging to Warfarin Therapy: Impact on Hospital Length of Stay and Treatment Costs for Low-Risk Patients with Pulmonary Embolism.利伐沙班与肝素桥接华法林治疗:对低风险肺栓塞患者住院时间和治疗费用的影响。
Pharmacotherapy. 2016 Oct;36(10):1109-1115. doi: 10.1002/phar.1828. Epub 2016 Sep 19.
3
Hospital length-of-stay and costs among pulmonary embolism patients treated with rivaroxaban versus parenteral bridging to warfarin.接受利伐沙班治疗的肺栓塞患者与接受胃肠外桥接华法林治疗的肺栓塞患者的住院时间和费用比较。
Intern Emerg Med. 2017 Apr;12(3):311-318. doi: 10.1007/s11739-016-1552-1. Epub 2016 Oct 18.
4
Shortened hospital length of stay and lower costs associated with rivaroxaban in patients with pulmonary embolism managed as observation status.对于以观察状态管理的肺栓塞患者,利伐沙班可缩短住院时间并降低费用。
Int J Clin Pract. 2017 Jan;71(1). doi: 10.1111/ijcp.12915.
5
Is Rivaroxaban Associated With Shorter Hospital Stays and Reduced Costs Versus Parenteral Bridging to Warfarin Among Patients With Pulmonary Embolism?在肺栓塞患者中,与采用胃肠外桥接华法林相比,利伐沙班是否与缩短住院时间及降低费用相关?
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2017 Oct;23(7):830-837. doi: 10.1177/1076029616661415. Epub 2016 Aug 1.
6
Risk of stroke/systemic embolism, major bleeding and associated costs in non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients who initiated apixaban, dabigatran or rivaroxaban compared with warfarin in the United States Medicare population.在美国医疗保险人群中,与华法林相比,起始使用阿哌沙班、达比加群或利伐沙班的非瓣膜性心房颤动患者发生中风/全身性栓塞、大出血及相关费用的风险。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2017 Sep;33(9):1595-1604. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2017.1345729. Epub 2017 Jul 11.
7
Retrospective Analysis of Direct-Acting Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs) Initiation Timing and Outcomes After Thrombolysis in High- and Intermediate-Risk Pulmonary Embolism.高、中危肺栓塞溶栓后直接口服抗凝剂(DOACs)起始时机与结局的回顾性分析
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2023 Jan-Dec;29:10760296231156414. doi: 10.1177/10760296231156414.
8
Comparison of the Effectiveness and Safety of Apixaban, Dabigatran, Rivaroxaban, and Warfarin in Newly Diagnosed Atrial Fibrillation.阿哌沙班、达比加群、利伐沙班和华法林在新诊断房颤中的有效性和安全性比较。
Am J Cardiol. 2017 Nov 15;120(10):1813-1819. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.07.092. Epub 2017 Aug 8.
9
Treatment of acute pulmonary embolism after catheter-directed thrombolysis with dabigatran vs warfarin: Results of a multicenter randomized RE-SPIRE trial.经导管溶栓治疗后达比加群与华法林治疗急性肺栓塞的疗效比较:一项多中心随机 RE-SPIRE 试验的结果。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2024 Jul;12(4):101848. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2024.101848. Epub 2024 Feb 10.
10
Effectiveness and Safety of Apixaban, Dabigatran, and Rivaroxaban Versus Warfarin in Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation and Previous Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack.非瓣膜性心房颤动且既往有卒中和短暂性脑缺血发作患者中应用阿哌沙班、达比加群和利伐沙班与华法林的有效性和安全性。
Stroke. 2017 Aug;48(8):2142-2149. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.017474. Epub 2017 Jun 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Direct Oral Anticoagulants Compared to Warfarin in Patients with Intermediate- to High-Risk Pulmonary Embolism: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.直接口服抗凝剂与华法林用于中高危肺栓塞患者的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
EJHaem. 2025 Jun 6;6(3):e70031. doi: 10.1002/jha2.70031. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
A Chinese patient with cardiogenic stroke and warfarin resistance: a case report.一名患有心源性卒中且对华法林耐药的中国患者:病例报告
BMC Neurol. 2025 Feb 24;25(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s12883-025-04088-6.
3
The Length of Hospital Stay of Patients with Venous Thromboembolism: A Cross-Sectional Study from Jordan.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of hospital length of stay in patients treated with non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants or parenteral agents plus warfarin for venous thromboembolism.非维生素K口服抗凝剂或肠外制剂联合华法林治疗静脉血栓栓塞患者的住院时间比较。
SAGE Open Med. 2017 Jul 18;5:2050312117719628. doi: 10.1177/2050312117719628. eCollection 2017.
2
Shorter Hospital Stays and Lower Costs for Rivaroxaban Compared With Warfarin for Venous Thrombosis Admissions.与华法林相比,利伐沙班用于静脉血栓形成入院治疗时住院时间更短且费用更低。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2016 Oct 6;5(10):e003788. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.003788.
3
Hospital length-of-stay and costs among pulmonary embolism patients treated with rivaroxaban versus parenteral bridging to warfarin.
静脉血栓栓塞症患者的住院时间:来自约旦的一项横断面研究。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Apr 7;59(4):727. doi: 10.3390/medicina59040727.
4
Retrospective Analysis of Direct-Acting Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs) Initiation Timing and Outcomes After Thrombolysis in High- and Intermediate-Risk Pulmonary Embolism.高、中危肺栓塞溶栓后直接口服抗凝剂(DOACs)起始时机与结局的回顾性分析
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2023 Jan-Dec;29:10760296231156414. doi: 10.1177/10760296231156414.
5
Pharmacokinetics and dialytic clearance of apixaban during in vitro continuous renal replacement therapy.阿哌沙班在体外连续性肾脏替代治疗期间的药代动力学和透析清除率。
BMC Nephrol. 2021 Jan 30;22(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s12882-021-02248-7.
6
Diagnosis, Treatment and Follow Up of Acute Pulmonary Embolism: Consensus Practice from the PERT Consortium.急性肺栓塞的诊断、治疗和随访:PERT 联盟的共识实践。
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2019 Jan-Dec;25:1076029619853037. doi: 10.1177/1076029619853037.
7
Efficacy of rivaroxaban for pulmonary embolism.利伐沙班治疗肺栓塞的疗效。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Apr;98(16):e15224. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000015224.
接受利伐沙班治疗的肺栓塞患者与接受胃肠外桥接华法林治疗的肺栓塞患者的住院时间和费用比较。
Intern Emerg Med. 2017 Apr;12(3):311-318. doi: 10.1007/s11739-016-1552-1. Epub 2016 Oct 18.
4
Pulmonary Embolism Inpatients Treated With Rivaroxaban Had Shorter Hospital Stays and Lower Costs Compared With Warfarin.与华法林相比,接受利伐沙班治疗的肺栓塞住院患者住院时间更短,费用更低。
Clin Ther. 2016 Nov;38(11):2496-2503. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2016.09.007. Epub 2016 Oct 15.
5
Rivaroxaban versus Heparin Bridging to Warfarin Therapy: Impact on Hospital Length of Stay and Treatment Costs for Low-Risk Patients with Pulmonary Embolism.利伐沙班与肝素桥接华法林治疗:对低风险肺栓塞患者住院时间和治疗费用的影响。
Pharmacotherapy. 2016 Oct;36(10):1109-1115. doi: 10.1002/phar.1828. Epub 2016 Sep 19.
6
Is Rivaroxaban Associated With Shorter Hospital Stays and Reduced Costs Versus Parenteral Bridging to Warfarin Among Patients With Pulmonary Embolism?在肺栓塞患者中,与采用胃肠外桥接华法林相比,利伐沙班是否与缩短住院时间及降低费用相关?
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2017 Oct;23(7):830-837. doi: 10.1177/1076029616661415. Epub 2016 Aug 1.
7
Comparing Length of Stay Between Patients Taking Rivaroxaban and Conventional Anticoagulants for Treatment of Venous Thromboembolism.比较利伐沙班与传统抗凝剂治疗静脉血栓栓塞症患者的住院时间。
Lung. 2016 Aug;194(4):605-11. doi: 10.1007/s00408-016-9898-8. Epub 2016 May 18.
8
Comparison of hospital length of stay and hospitalization costs among patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation treated with apixaban or warfarin: An early view.阿哌沙班或华法林治疗非瓣膜性心房颤动患者的住院时间和住院费用比较:初步观察
J Med Econ. 2016 Aug;19(8):769-76. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2016.1171774. Epub 2016 Apr 24.
9
Length of Stay Comparison between Rivaroxaban and Warfarin in the Treatment of Pulmonary Embolism: Results from a Real-World Observational Cohort Study.利伐沙班与华法林治疗肺栓塞的住院时间比较:一项真实世界观察性队列研究的结果
Thrombosis. 2015;2015:414523. doi: 10.1155/2015/414523. Epub 2015 Dec 31.
10
Antithrombotic Therapy for VTE Disease: CHEST Guideline and Expert Panel Report.抗栓治疗 VTE 疾病:CHEST 指南和专家小组报告。
Chest. 2016 Feb;149(2):315-352. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2015.11.026. Epub 2016 Jan 7.