Aneiros Castro Belén, Cano Novillo Indalecio, García Vázquez Araceli, Yuste García Pedro, Ferrero Herrero Eduardo, Gómez Fraile Andrés
Department of Pediatric Surgery, 12 October Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Department of General Surgery, 12 October Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2018 Nov;11(4):362-365. doi: 10.1111/ases.12470. Epub 2018 Feb 19.
Subhepatic appendicitis in children is an unusual condition that can be challenging for the pediatric surgeons to treat. The aim of our study was to compare the outcomes of laparoscopic appendectomies based on the position of the appendix.
The data of 1736 patients who had undergone laparoscopic appendectomy in our tertiary center were retrospectively reviewed. We compared two groups: subhepatic location (n = 56) and non-subhepatic location (n = 1680). A P-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
There was no statistically significant difference between the demographic variables of the groups. More than half of the subhepatic appendicitises were gangrenous (44.6%) or perforated (16.1%), whereas most of the non-subhepatic appendicitises were phlegmonous (56.9%). Extracorporeal ligation of the appendix was the preferred technique in both the subhepatic and non-subhepatic groups (69.6% and 89.8%, respectively). The subhepatic group had a statistically significant higher incidence of technical difficulties (1.6%) and abdominal drain (18.6%) than the non-subhepatic group, as well as a longer operative time and hospital stay. However, intraoperative and postoperative complications were similar in both groups.
Laparoscopic subhepatic appendectomy is safe and does not lead to increased complications. However, the technique is made difficult by the fact that the appendix is an atypical location, and the rate of complicated appendicitis is higher.
儿童肝下阑尾炎是一种不常见的病症,对小儿外科医生来说治疗颇具挑战性。我们研究的目的是比较基于阑尾位置的腹腔镜阑尾切除术的结果。
回顾性分析了在我们三级中心接受腹腔镜阑尾切除术的1736例患者的数据。我们比较了两组:肝下位置组(n = 56)和非肝下位置组(n = 1680)。P值小于0.05被认为具有统计学意义。
两组的人口统计学变量之间无统计学显著差异。超过一半的肝下阑尾炎为坏疽性(44.6%)或穿孔性(16.1%),而大多数非肝下阑尾炎为蜂窝织炎性(56.9%)。在肝下组和非肝下组中,阑尾体外结扎都是首选技术(分别为69.6%和89.8%)。肝下组的技术困难发生率(1.6%)和腹腔引流率(18.6%)在统计学上显著高于非肝下组,手术时间和住院时间也更长。然而,两组的术中及术后并发症相似。
腹腔镜肝下阑尾切除术是安全的,不会导致并发症增加。然而,由于阑尾位置不典型,该技术操作困难,且复杂阑尾炎的发生率更高。