Al-Ahmad Ali, Muzafferiy Fariba, Anderson Annette C, Wölber Johan P, Ratka-Krüger Petra, Fretwurst Tobias, Nelson Katja, Vach Kirstin, Hellwig Elmar
Department of Operative Dentistry and Periodontology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Germany.
Department of Oral and Craniomaxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Germany.
J Med Microbiol. 2018 Mar;67(3):332-340. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.000682. Epub 2018 Jan 24.
Micro-organisms are important triggers of peri-implant inflammation and analysing their diversity is necessary for peri-implantitis treatment. This study aimed to analyse and compare the microbiota associated with individuals with peri-implantitis, as well as clinically healthy implant sites.
Subgingival biofilm samples were taken from 10 individuals with peri-implantitis and from at least 1 clinically healthy implant. DNA was extracted and bacterial 16S rRNA genes were amplified using universal primers. After cloning the PCR-products, amplified inserts of positive clones were digested using restriction endonucleases, and the chosen clones were sequenced. The 16S rDNA-sequences were compared to those from the public sequence databases GenBank, EMBL and DDBJ to determine the corresponding taxa.
Differing distributions of taxa belonging to the phyla Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, Fusobacteria, Actinobacteria, Proteobacteria, Synergistetes, Spirochaetae and TM 7 were detected in both the healthy implant (HI) and the peri-implantitis (PI) groups. A significantly higher relative abundance of phylum Bacteroidetes, as well as of the species Fusobacterium nucleatum, were found in the PI group (P<0.05). The putative periodontal red complex (Porphyromonas gingivalis, Tannerella forsythia) was also detected at significantly higher levels in the PI group (P<0.05), whereas the yellow group, as well as the species Veillonella dispar, tended to be associated with the HI group.
A shift in the healthy subgingival microbiota was shown in peri-implantitis-associated biofilm. Anaerobic Gram-negative periopathogens, including P. gingivalis and T. forsythia, seem to play an important role in peri-implantitis development and should be considered in treatment and prevention strategies.
微生物是种植体周围炎症的重要触发因素,分析其多样性对于种植体周炎的治疗至关重要。本研究旨在分析和比较与种植体周炎患者以及临床健康种植位点相关的微生物群。
从10名种植体周炎患者和至少1个临床健康种植体处采集龈下生物膜样本。提取DNA,并使用通用引物扩增细菌16S rRNA基因。PCR产物克隆后,用限制性内切酶消化阳性克隆的扩增插入片段,并对所选克隆进行测序。将16S rDNA序列与公共序列数据库GenBank、EMBL和DDBJ中的序列进行比较,以确定相应的分类单元。
在健康种植体(HI)组和种植体周炎(PI)组中均检测到厚壁菌门、拟杆菌门、梭杆菌门、放线菌门、变形菌门、协同菌门、螺旋体门和TM 7等不同分类单元的分布。PI组中拟杆菌门以及具核梭杆菌的相对丰度显著更高(P<0.05)。在PI组中还检测到假定的牙周红色复合体(牙龈卟啉单胞菌、福赛坦纳菌)水平显著更高(P<0.05),而黄色复合体以及殊异韦荣球菌往往与HI组相关。
种植体周炎相关生物膜中显示出健康龈下微生物群的转变。包括牙龈卟啉单胞菌和福赛坦纳菌在内的厌氧革兰氏阴性牙周病原体似乎在种植体周炎的发展中起重要作用,在治疗和预防策略中应予以考虑。