Medical Research Council Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Bristol Medical School, Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Addiction. 2018 Jun;113(6):1105-1116. doi: 10.1111/add.14146. Epub 2018 Feb 20.
To investigate whether smokers prescribed varenicline had lower risks of serious ill-health during the 4 years following treatment compared with those prescribed nicotine replacement therapy (NRT).
Observational cohort study of electronic medical records.
A total of 370 UK general practices sampled from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink.
A total of 126 718 patients aged 18 and over who were issued smoking cessation prescriptions between 1 September 2006 and 31 March 2014.
Our primary outcome was all-cause mortality within 2 years of first prescription as indicated by linked Office of National Statistics data. Our secondary outcomes were cause-specific mortality, all-cause, cause-specific hospitalization, primary care diagnosis of myocardial infarction or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), body mass index and attendance rate to primary care within 2 years of first prescription. Risk differences and 95% confidence intervals were estimated by multivariable adjusted regression and propensity score matched regression. We used instrumental variable analysis to overcome residual confounding.
People prescribed varenicline were healthier at baseline than those prescribed NRT in almost all characteristics, highlighting the potential for residual confounding. Our instrumental variable analysis results found that people prescribed varenicline had a similar risk of mortality at 2 years [risk difference per 100 patients treated = 0.67, 95% confidence interval (CI) = -0.11 to 1.46)] to those prescribed NRT, and there were similar rates of all-cause hospitalization, incident primary-care diagnoses of myocardial infarction and COPD. People prescribed varenicline subsequently attended primary care less frequently.
Smokers prescribed varenicline in primary care in the United Kingdom do not appear to be less likely to die, be hospitalized or experience a myocardial infarction or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease during the following 2 years compared with smokers prescribed nicotine replacement therapy, but they gain more weight and attend primary care less frequently.
研究与尼古丁替代疗法(NRT)相比,在治疗后 4 年内,接受伐尼克兰治疗的吸烟者出现严重健康问题的风险是否更低。
电子病历的观察性队列研究。
从临床实践研究数据链中抽取的英国共 370 家全科诊所。
2006 年 9 月 1 日至 2014 年 3 月 31 日期间,年龄在 18 岁及以上并开具戒烟处方的 126718 名患者。
我们的主要结局是通过链接的国家统计局数据,首次处方后 2 年内全因死亡率。我们的次要结局是特定原因死亡率、全因死亡率、特定原因住院率、首次处方后 2 年内初级保健诊断的心肌梗死或慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)、体重指数和初级保健就诊率。通过多变量调整回归和倾向评分匹配回归估计风险差异和 95%置信区间。我们使用工具变量分析来克服残留混杂。
与接受 NRT 治疗的患者相比,接受伐尼克兰治疗的患者在几乎所有特征上基线时更健康,这突出了残留混杂的可能性。我们的工具变量分析结果发现,接受伐尼克兰治疗的患者在 2 年内的死亡率风险相似[每 100 名治疗患者的风险差异=0.67,95%置信区间(CI)=-0.11 至 1.46],且全因住院率、初级保健确诊的心肌梗死和 COPD 发生率相似。接受伐尼克兰治疗的患者随后就诊初级保健的频率较低。
与接受尼古丁替代疗法治疗的吸烟者相比,在英国接受初级保健治疗的吸烟者在接下来的 2 年内死亡、住院或发生心肌梗死或慢性阻塞性肺疾病的可能性似乎没有降低,但他们的体重增加,就诊初级保健的频率降低。