Freitag Bettina, Fehring Leonard, Uncovska Marie, Olsacher Alexandra, Meister Sven
Health Care Informatics, Faculty of Health, School of Medicine, Witten/Herdecke University, Alfred-Herrhausen-Straße 50, Witten, 58455, Germany.
Faculty of Health, School of Medicine, Witten/Herdecke University, Alfred-Herrhausen-Straße 50, Witten, 58455, Germany.
Health Econ Rev. 2024 Oct 4;14(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s13561-024-00558-8.
Germany was the first country worldwide to offer mobile digital health applications (mHealth apps, "DiGA") on prescription with full cost coverage by statutory health insurances. Especially statutory health insurances criticize the current pricing and payment regulations in Germany due to "free and non-transparent" pricing in the first year and lack of cost use evidence. The study consists of two parts: The first part evaluates interests of digital health application providers and statutory health insurances in Germany to identify overlaps and divergences of interests. The second part includes the development of a comprehensive pricing and payment taxonomy for reimbursable mHealth apps in general.
Both parts of the study used the input from 16 expert interviews with representatives of digital health application providers and statutory health insurances in Germany. In part one the authors conducted a qualitative content analysis and in part two they followed the taxonomy development process according to Nickerson et al. (2013).
A value based care model is expected to bring the greatest benefit for patients while statutory health insurances welcome the idea of usage based pricing. The final pricing and payment taxonomy consists of four design and negotiation steps (price finding, payment prerequisites, payment modalities, composition of negotiation board).
As healthcare resources are scarce and thus need to be optimally allocated, it is important to implement pricing and payment terms for reimbursable mHealth apps that result in the greatest benefit for patients. To the best of the authors' knowledge, there has been no structured study yet that examines alternative pricing strategies for reimbursable mHealth apps.The developed pricing and payment taxonomy for reimbursable mHealth apps serves as planning and decision basis for developers, health policy makers and payers internationally.
德国是全球首个提供可凭处方开具且由法定医疗保险全额覆盖费用的移动数字健康应用程序(移动健康应用程序,“数字医疗服务应用程序”)的国家。特别是法定医疗保险批评德国当前的定价和支付规定,原因是第一年定价“免费且不透明”,且缺乏成本使用证据。该研究包括两个部分:第一部分评估德国数字健康应用程序提供商和法定医疗保险的利益,以确定利益的重叠和分歧。第二部分总体上包括为可报销的移动健康应用程序制定全面的定价和支付分类法。
该研究的两个部分都采用了对德国数字健康应用程序提供商和法定医疗保险代表进行的16次专家访谈的意见。在第一部分中,作者进行了定性内容分析,在第二部分中,他们遵循了尼克森等人(2013年)的分类法开发过程。
基于价值的医疗模式预计将为患者带来最大益处,而法定医疗保险则欢迎基于使用量定价的理念。最终的定价和支付分类法包括四个设计和谈判步骤(定价、支付前提条件、支付方式、谈判委员会组成)。
由于医疗资源稀缺,因此需要进行优化分配,为可报销的移动健康应用程序实施能为患者带来最大益处的定价和支付条款非常重要。据作者所知,尚未有结构化研究考察可报销移动健康应用程序的替代定价策略。为可报销移动健康应用程序制定的定价和支付分类法为国际上的开发者、卫生政策制定者和支付方提供了规划和决策依据。