• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

五年来两价灭活全细胞霍乱疫苗的效果:一项集群随机试验的再分析。

Efficacy of a bivalent killed whole-cell cholera vaccine over five years: a re-analysis of a cluster-randomized trial.

机构信息

Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview Ave N., Seattle, 98109, WA, USA.

Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, 98195, WA, USA.

出版信息

BMC Infect Dis. 2018 Feb 20;18(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s12879-018-2981-4.

DOI:10.1186/s12879-018-2981-4
PMID:29463233
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5819652/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Oral cholera vaccine (OCV) is a feasible tool to prevent or mitigate cholera outbreaks. A better understanding of the vaccine's efficacy among different age groups and how rapidly its protection wanes could help guide vaccination policy.

METHODS

To estimate the level and duration of OCV efficacy, we re-analyzed data from a previously published cluster-randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled trial with five years of follow-up. We used a Cox proportional hazards model and modeled the potentially time-dependent effect of age categories on both vaccine efficacy and risk of infection in the placebo group. In addition, we investigated the impact of an outbreak period on model estimation.

RESULTS

Vaccine efficacy was 38% (95% CI: -2%,62%) for those vaccinated from ages 1 to under 5 years old, 85% (95% CI: 67%,93%) for those 5 to under 15 years, and 69% (95% CI: 49%,81%) for those vaccinated at ages 15 years and older. Among adult vaccinees, efficacy did not appear to wane during the trial, but there was insufficient data to assess the waning of efficacy among child vaccinees.

CONCLUSIONS

Through this re-analysis we were able to detect a statistically significant difference in OCV efficacy when the vaccine was administered to children under 5 years old vs. children 5 years and older. The estimated efficacies are more similar to the previously published analysis based on the first two years of follow-up than the analysis based on all five years.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00289224.

摘要

背景

口服霍乱疫苗(OCV)是预防或减轻霍乱暴发的可行工具。更好地了解不同年龄组疫苗的效果以及其保护作用迅速减弱的情况,有助于指导疫苗接种政策。

方法

为了估计 OCV 功效的水平和持续时间,我们重新分析了先前发表的一项为期五年随访的、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的聚类试验的数据。我们使用 Cox 比例风险模型,并对年龄组对疫苗功效和安慰剂组感染风险的潜在时变影响进行建模。此外,我们还研究了暴发期对模型估计的影响。

结果

对于 1 岁以下的接种者,疫苗的有效性为 38%(95%置信区间:-2%,62%);对于 5 岁以下的接种者,疫苗的有效性为 85%(95%置信区间:67%,93%);对于 15 岁及以上的接种者,疫苗的有效性为 69%(95%置信区间:49%,81%)。在成年接种者中,疫苗的有效性在试验期间似乎没有减弱,但缺乏足够的数据来评估儿童接种者疫苗效力的减弱情况。

结论

通过这项重新分析,我们能够检测到在向 5 岁以下儿童和 5 岁及以上儿童接种疫苗时 OCV 功效的统计学显著差异。估计的功效与基于前两年随访的先前发表的分析更相似,而不是基于所有五年的分析。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符 NCT00289224。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16f8/5819652/da26664a9529/12879_2018_2981_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16f8/5819652/f83677ac7646/12879_2018_2981_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16f8/5819652/da26664a9529/12879_2018_2981_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16f8/5819652/f83677ac7646/12879_2018_2981_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16f8/5819652/da26664a9529/12879_2018_2981_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Efficacy of a bivalent killed whole-cell cholera vaccine over five years: a re-analysis of a cluster-randomized trial.五年来两价灭活全细胞霍乱疫苗的效果:一项集群随机试验的再分析。
BMC Infect Dis. 2018 Feb 20;18(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s12879-018-2981-4.
2
Efficacy of a low-cost, inactivated whole-cell oral cholera vaccine: results from 3 years of follow-up of a randomized, controlled trial.低成本灭活全细胞口服霍乱疫苗的有效性:一项随机对照试验 3 年随访结果。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2011 Oct;5(10):e1289. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001289. Epub 2011 Oct 18.
3
Efficacy and safety of a modified killed-whole-cell oral cholera vaccine in India: an interim analysis of a cluster-randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.一种改良的口服霍乱全细胞灭活疫苗在印度的疗效与安全性:一项整群随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验的中期分析
Lancet. 2009 Nov 14;374(9702):1694-702. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61297-6. Epub 2009 Oct 8.
4
Effectiveness of a killed whole-cell oral cholera vaccine in Bangladesh: further follow-up of a cluster-randomised trial.在孟加拉国使用口服霍乱全细胞灭活疫苗的效果:一项集群随机试验的进一步随访。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Oct;21(10):1407-1414. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30781-7. Epub 2021 Jun 16.
5
Efficacy of a single-dose regimen of inactivated whole-cell oral cholera vaccine: results from 2 years of follow-up of a randomised trial.单价型全细胞灭活口服霍乱疫苗的有效性:一项随机试验 2 年随访结果。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2018 Jun;18(6):666-674. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30108-7. Epub 2018 Mar 14.
6
Unmasking herd protection by an oral cholera vaccine in a cluster-randomized trial.在一项群组随机试验中揭示口服霍乱疫苗的群体保护作用。
Int J Epidemiol. 2019 Aug 1;48(4):1252-1261. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyz060.
7
A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of the bivalent killed, whole-cell, oral cholera vaccine in adults and children in a cholera endemic area in Kolkata, India.在印度加尔各答霍乱流行地区对成人和儿童进行的二价灭活全细胞口服霍乱疫苗随机安慰剂对照试验。
PLoS One. 2008 Jun 4;3(6):e2323. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002323.
8
5 year efficacy of a bivalent killed whole-cell oral cholera vaccine in Kolkata, India: a cluster-randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.印度加尔各答两价口服霍乱全细胞疫苗 5 年有效性:一项集群随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2013 Dec;13(12):1050-6. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(13)70273-1. Epub 2013 Oct 18.
9
Field trial of a locally produced, killed, oral cholera vaccine in Vietnam.越南一种本地生产的口服霍乱灭活疫苗的现场试验。
Lancet. 1997 Jan 25;349(9047):231-5. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(96)06107-7.
10
Herd protection by a bivalent killed whole-cell oral cholera vaccine in the slums of Kolkata, India.印度加尔各答贫民窟中两价口服霍乱死疫苗对人群的保护作用。
Clin Infect Dis. 2013 Apr;56(8):1123-31. doi: 10.1093/cid/cit009. Epub 2013 Jan 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Allocation of Oral Cholera Vaccines in Africa.非洲口服霍乱疫苗的分配
Vaccines (Basel). 2025 May 14;13(5):519. doi: 10.3390/vaccines13050519.
2
Designs for Vaccine Studies.疫苗研究设计。
Annu Rev Stat Appl. 2025 Mar;12:1-18. doi: 10.1146/annurev-statistics-033121-120121. Epub 2024 Oct 30.
3
Effectiveness of interventions to improve vaccine efficacy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.提高疫苗效力的干预措施的有效性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析

本文引用的文献

1
Feasibility and effectiveness of oral cholera vaccine in an urban endemic setting in Bangladesh: a cluster randomised open-label trial.孟加拉国城市流行地区口服霍乱疫苗的可行性和有效性:一项整群随机开放标签试验。
Lancet. 2015 Oct 3;386(10001):1362-1371. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)61140-0. Epub 2015 Jul 9.
2
Updated global burden of cholera in endemic countries.流行国家霍乱的全球负担最新情况。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015 Jun 4;9(6):e0003832. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003832. eCollection 2015.
3
An Open Label Non-inferiority Trial Assessing Vibriocidal Response of a Killed Bivalent Oral Cholera Vaccine Regimen following a Five Year Interval in Kolkata, India.
Syst Rev. 2025 May 9;14(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s13643-025-02856-6.
4
Oral killed cholera vaccines for preventing cholera.口服霍乱疫苗预防霍乱。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jan 10;1(1):CD014573. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014573.
5
Competing Heterogeneities in Vaccine Effectiveness Estimation.疫苗效力估计中的竞争异质性
Vaccines (Basel). 2023 Aug 1;11(8):1312. doi: 10.3390/vaccines11081312.
6
Competing Heterogeneities in Vaccine Effectiveness Estimation.疫苗效力估计中的竞争异质性
ArXiv. 2023 May 12:arXiv:2305.01737v2.
7
An Age-stratified, Randomized Immunogenicity Trial of Killed Oral Cholera Vaccine with Delayed Second Dose in Cameroon.喀麦隆一项分层年龄、随机、免疫原性试验研究延迟第二剂口服霍乱死疫苗的效果。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2022 Nov 14;107(5):974-983. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.22-0462.
8
Estimating Waning of Vaccine Effectiveness: A Simulation Study.估算疫苗效力衰减:一项模拟研究。
Clin Infect Dis. 2023 Feb 8;76(3):479-486. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciac725.
9
Mathematical Modeling of Endemic Cholera Transmission.地方性霍乱传播的数学建模。
J Infect Dis. 2021 Dec 20;224(12 Suppl 2):S738-S741. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiab472.
10
Durability of protection after 5 doses of acellular pertussis vaccine among 5-9 year old children in King County, Washington.在华盛顿金县,5-9 岁儿童接种 5 剂无细胞百白破疫苗后的保护持久性。
Vaccine. 2021 Oct 1;39(41):6144-6150. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.08.070. Epub 2021 Sep 4.
一项开放标签非劣效性试验,评估印度加尔各答五年间隔期后一种灭活双价口服霍乱疫苗方案的杀弧菌反应。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015 May 29;9(5):e0003809. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003809. eCollection 2015 May.
4
Effectiveness of reactive oral cholera vaccination in rural Haiti: a case-control study and bias-indicator analysis.海地农村地区口服霍乱疫苗反应性接种的效果:病例对照研究和偏差指标分析。
Lancet Glob Health. 2015 Mar;3(3):e162-8. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(14)70368-7.
5
Post-licensure deployment of oral cholera vaccines: a systematic review.口服霍乱疫苗上市后应用:一项系统评价
Bull World Health Organ. 2014 Dec 1;92(12):881-93. doi: 10.2471/BLT.14.139949. Epub 2014 Sep 29.
6
Introducing cholera vaccination in Asia, Africa and Haiti: a meeting report.在亚洲、非洲和海地引入霍乱疫苗:会议报告
Vaccine. 2015 Jan 15;33(4):487-92. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.11.031. Epub 2014 Nov 28.
7
Oral cholera vaccine development and use in Vietnam.口服霍乱疫苗在越南的研发与应用
PLoS Med. 2014 Sep 2;11(9):e1001712. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001712. eCollection 2014 Sep.
8
Use of Vibrio cholerae vaccine in an outbreak in Guinea.在几内亚的疫情中使用霍乱弧菌疫苗。
N Engl J Med. 2014 May 29;370(22):2111-20. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1312680.
9
Maximizing protection from use of oral cholera vaccines in developing country settings: an immunological review of oral cholera vaccines.在发展中国家环境中最大化口服霍乱疫苗的保护作用:口服霍乱疫苗的免疫学综述
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2014;10(6):1457-65. doi: 10.4161/hv.29199. Epub 2014 May 26.
10
5 year efficacy of a bivalent killed whole-cell oral cholera vaccine in Kolkata, India: a cluster-randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.印度加尔各答两价口服霍乱全细胞疫苗 5 年有效性:一项集群随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2013 Dec;13(12):1050-6. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(13)70273-1. Epub 2013 Oct 18.