• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在孟加拉国使用口服霍乱全细胞灭活疫苗的效果:一项集群随机试验的进一步随访。

Effectiveness of a killed whole-cell oral cholera vaccine in Bangladesh: further follow-up of a cluster-randomised trial.

机构信息

Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MA, USA.

International Centre for Diarrheal Disease Research, Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh.

出版信息

Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Oct;21(10):1407-1414. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30781-7. Epub 2021 Jun 16.

DOI:10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30781-7
PMID:34146473
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9759785/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Killed whole-cell oral cholera vaccines (OCVs) are widely used for prevention of cholera in developing countries. However, few studies have evaluated the protection conferred by internationally recommended OCVs for durations beyond 2 years of follow-up.

METHODS

In this study, we followed up the participants of a cluster-randomised controlled trial for 2 years after the end of the original trial. Originally, we had randomised 90 geographical clusters in Dhaka slums in Bangladesh in equal numbers (1:1:1) to a two-dose regimen of OCV alone (targeted to people aged 1 year or older), a two-dose regimen of OCV plus a water-sanitation-hygiene (WASH) intervention, or no intervention. There was no masking of group assignment. The WASH intervention conferred little additional protection to OCV and was discontinued at 2 years of follow-up. Surveillance for severe cholera was continued for 4 years. Because of the short duration and effect of the WASH intervention, we combined the two OCV intervention groups. The primary outcomes were OCV overall protection (protection of all members of the intervention clusters) and total protection (protection of individuals who got vaccinated in the intervention clusters) against severe cholera, which we assessed by multivariable survival models appropriate for cluster-randomised trials. This trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01339845.

FINDINGS

The study was done between April 17, 2011, and Nov 1, 2015. 268 896 participants were present at the time of the first dose, with 188 206 in the intervention group and 80 690 in the control group. OCV coverage of the two groups receiving OCV was 66% (123 659 of 187 214 participants). During 4 years of follow-up, 441 first episodes of severe cholera were detected (243 episodes in the vaccinated groups and as 198 episodes in the unvaccinated group). Overall OCV protection was 36% (95% CI 19 to 49%) and total OCV protection was 46% (95% CI 32 to 58). Cumulative total vaccine protection was notably lower for people vaccinated before the age of 5 years (24%; -30 to 56) than for people vaccinated at age 5 years or older (49%; 35 to 60), although the differences in protection for the two age groups were not significant (p=0·3308). Total vaccine protection dropped notably (p=0·0115) after 3 years in children vaccinated at 1-4 years of age.

INTERPRETATION

These findings provide further evidence of long-term effectiveness of killed whole-cell OCV, and therefore further support for the use of killed whole-cell OCVs to control endemic cholera, but indicate that protection is shorter-lived in children vaccinated before the age of 5 years than in people vaccinated at the age of 5 years or older.

FUNDING

Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

TRANSLATION

For the Bengali translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

摘要

背景

在发展中国家,全细胞灭活口服霍乱疫苗(OCV)被广泛用于预防霍乱。然而,很少有研究评估国际推荐的 OCV 在 2 年以上的随访时间内提供的保护作用。

方法

本研究对一项原试验结束后随访 2 年的群组随机对照试验的参与者进行了随访。最初,我们在孟加拉国达卡贫民窟的 90 个地理群组中以 1:1:1 的比例随机分配到两组:两组均接受两剂 OCV(针对 1 岁或以上的人群),一组接受两剂 OCV 加水卫生-卫生(WASH)干预,另一组不接受干预。分组情况没有掩盖。WASH 干预对 OCV 几乎没有额外的保护作用,在 2 年的随访后停止。对严重霍乱的监测持续了 4 年。由于 WASH 干预的持续时间短且效果有限,我们将这两个 OCV 干预组合并。主要结局是 OCV 总体保护(干预组所有成员的保护)和总保护(在干预组中接种疫苗的个体的保护),我们通过适合群组随机试验的多变量生存模型评估了严重霍乱的情况。该试验在 ClinicalTrials.gov 上注册,编号为 NCT01339845。

发现

该研究于 2011 年 4 月 17 日至 2015 年 11 月 1 日进行。在第一次接种时,有 268896 名参与者,其中 188206 名在干预组,80690 名在对照组。两组接受 OCV 的疫苗接种率为 66%(187214 名参与者中有 123659 名)。在 4 年的随访期间,共发现 441 例严重霍乱首例病例(接种组 243 例,未接种组 198 例)。OCV 总体保护率为 36%(95%CI 19%至 49%),总 OCV 保护率为 46%(95%CI 32%至 58%)。5 岁以下人群的累积总疫苗保护率明显较低(24%;-30%至 56%),而 5 岁及以上人群的疫苗保护率明显较高(49%;35%至 60%),尽管两组的保护差异无统计学意义(p=0.3308)。在 1-4 岁接受疫苗接种的儿童中,总疫苗保护在 3 年后明显下降(p=0.0115)。

结论

这些发现进一步证明了全细胞灭活 OCV 的长期有效性,因此进一步支持使用全细胞灭活 OCV 来控制地方性霍乱,但表明在 5 岁以下儿童中接种疫苗的保护作用比 5 岁及以上儿童更短暂。

资金

比尔和梅琳达·盖茨基金会。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8fb8/9759785/6a0f3531422d/gr3_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8fb8/9759785/2c1b52b2b9f5/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8fb8/9759785/f37c40ec1759/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8fb8/9759785/6a0f3531422d/gr3_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8fb8/9759785/2c1b52b2b9f5/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8fb8/9759785/f37c40ec1759/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8fb8/9759785/6a0f3531422d/gr3_lrg.jpg

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of a killed whole-cell oral cholera vaccine in Bangladesh: further follow-up of a cluster-randomised trial.在孟加拉国使用口服霍乱全细胞灭活疫苗的效果:一项集群随机试验的进一步随访。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Oct;21(10):1407-1414. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30781-7. Epub 2021 Jun 16.
2
Efficacy of a single-dose regimen of inactivated whole-cell oral cholera vaccine: results from 2 years of follow-up of a randomised trial.单价型全细胞灭活口服霍乱疫苗的有效性:一项随机试验 2 年随访结果。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2018 Jun;18(6):666-674. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30108-7. Epub 2018 Mar 14.
3
Unmasking herd protection by an oral cholera vaccine in a cluster-randomized trial.在一项群组随机试验中揭示口服霍乱疫苗的群体保护作用。
Int J Epidemiol. 2019 Aug 1;48(4):1252-1261. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyz060.
4
Efficacy of a low-cost, inactivated whole-cell oral cholera vaccine: results from 3 years of follow-up of a randomized, controlled trial.低成本灭活全细胞口服霍乱疫苗的有效性:一项随机对照试验 3 年随访结果。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2011 Oct;5(10):e1289. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001289. Epub 2011 Oct 18.
5
The interplay between WASH practices and vaccination with oral cholera vaccines in protecting against cholera in urban Bangladesh: Reanalysis of a cluster-randomized trial.WASH 措施与口服霍乱疫苗接种在孟加拉国城市预防霍乱中的相互作用:一项集群随机试验的再分析。
Vaccine. 2023 Mar 31;41(14):2368-2375. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.02.054. Epub 2023 Mar 8.
6
Efficacy and safety of a modified killed-whole-cell oral cholera vaccine in India: an interim analysis of a cluster-randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.一种改良的口服霍乱全细胞灭活疫苗在印度的疗效与安全性:一项整群随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验的中期分析
Lancet. 2009 Nov 14;374(9702):1694-702. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61297-6. Epub 2009 Oct 8.
7
Feasibility and effectiveness of oral cholera vaccine in an urban endemic setting in Bangladesh: a cluster randomised open-label trial.孟加拉国城市流行地区口服霍乱疫苗的可行性和有效性:一项整群随机开放标签试验。
Lancet. 2015 Oct 3;386(10001):1362-1371. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)61140-0. Epub 2015 Jul 9.
8
Field trial of a locally produced, killed, oral cholera vaccine in Vietnam.越南一种本地生产的口服霍乱灭活疫苗的现场试验。
Lancet. 1997 Jan 25;349(9047):231-5. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(96)06107-7.
9
Transient Intestinal Colonization by a Live-Attenuated Oral Cholera Vaccine Induces Protective Immune Responses in Streptomycin-Treated Mice.口服减毒霍乱活疫苗对链霉素处理小鼠的短暂肠道定植诱导保护性免疫应答。
J Bacteriol. 2020 Nov 19;202(24). doi: 10.1128/JB.00232-20.
10
Use of oral cholera vaccine as a vaccine probe to determine the burden of culture-negative cholera.口服霍乱疫苗作为疫苗探针,以确定无培养阳性霍乱的负担。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019 Mar 14;13(3):e0007179. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007179. eCollection 2019 Mar.

引用本文的文献

1
Infectious disease research in forcibly displaced populations: A systematic review in low- and middle-income host countries.流离失所人群中的传染病研究:低收入和中等收入收容国的系统评价
J Migr Health. 2025 Jun 27;12:100341. doi: 10.1016/j.jmh.2025.100341. eCollection 2025.
2
Protection from killed whole-cell cholera vaccines: a systematic review and meta-analysis.全细胞霍乱灭活疫苗的保护作用:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Lancet Glob Health. 2025 Jul;13(7):e1203-e1212. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(25)00107-X.
3
Dynamics of IgM and IgA Antibody Response Profile Against Toxins A, B, and P.

本文引用的文献

1
Global oral cholera vaccine use, 2013-2018.全球口服霍乱疫苗使用情况,2013-2018 年。
Vaccine. 2020 Feb 29;38 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):A132-A140. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.08.086. Epub 2019 Sep 10.
2
Unmasking herd protection by an oral cholera vaccine in a cluster-randomized trial.在一项群组随机试验中揭示口服霍乱疫苗的群体保护作用。
Int J Epidemiol. 2019 Aug 1;48(4):1252-1261. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyz060.
3
Long-term effectiveness of one and two doses of a killed, bivalent, whole-cell oral cholera vaccine in Haiti: an extended case-control study.
针对毒素A、B和P的IgM和IgA抗体反应谱的动态变化
Int J Mol Sci. 2025 Apr 9;26(8):3507. doi: 10.3390/ijms26083507.
4
Challenges with achieving and maintaining oral cholera vaccine coverage: insights from serial cross-sectional representative surveys in a cholera-endemic community in the Democratic Republic of the Congo.实现和维持口服霍乱疫苗覆盖率面临的挑战:来自刚果民主共和国霍乱流行社区系列横断面代表性调查的见解
BMJ Public Health. 2025 Jan 19;3(1):e001035. doi: 10.1136/bmjph-2024-001035. eCollection 2025.
5
Evaluation of oral cholera vaccine (Euvichol-Plus) effectiveness against in Bangladesh: an interim analysis.孟加拉国口服霍乱疫苗(优维克 Plus)有效性评估:中期分析。
BMJ Glob Health. 2025 Feb 3;10(2):e016571. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2024-016571.
6
Comprehensive Review on the Use of Oral Cholera Vaccine (OCV) in Ethiopia: 2019 to 2023.埃塞俄比亚口服霍乱疫苗(OCV)使用情况的综合综述:2019 年至 2023 年。
Clin Infect Dis. 2024 Jul 12;79(Supplement_1):S20-S32. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciae194.
7
Cholera Deaths During Outbreaks in Uvira, Eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo, 10-35 Months After Mass Vaccination.刚果民主共和国东部乌维拉大规模疫苗接种10至35个月后霍乱疫情期间的死亡情况。
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2024 Feb 1;11(3):ofae058. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofae058. eCollection 2024 Mar.
8
Effectiveness of one dose of killed oral cholera vaccine in an endemic community in the Democratic Republic of the Congo: a matched case-control study.一剂口服霍乱死疫苗在刚果民主共和国流行地区的有效性:一项匹配病例对照研究。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2024 May;24(5):514-522. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(23)00742-9. Epub 2024 Jan 18.
9
Oral killed cholera vaccines for preventing cholera.口服霍乱疫苗预防霍乱。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jan 10;1(1):CD014573. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014573.
10
Coverage survey and lessons learned from a pre-emptive cholera vaccination campaign in urban and rural communities affected by landslides and floods in Freetown Sierra Leone.塞拉利昂弗里敦受山体滑坡和洪水影响的城乡社区先发制人霍乱疫苗接种运动的覆盖情况调查和经验教训。
Vaccine. 2023 Mar 31;41(14):2397-2403. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.01.026. Epub 2023 Mar 3.
海地一剂和两剂口服灭活、二价、全细胞霍乱疫苗的长期效果:一项扩展病例对照研究。
Lancet Glob Health. 2018 Sep;6(9):e1028-e1035. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30284-5.
4
Impact of adding hand-washing and water disinfection promotion to oral cholera vaccination on diarrhoea-associated hospitalization in Dhaka, Bangladesh: evidence from a cluster randomized control trial.孟加拉国达卡地区开展手部卫生和饮水消毒推广对口服霍乱疫苗接种相关住院腹泻的影响:一项基于群组随机对照试验的证据。
Int J Epidemiol. 2017 Dec 1;46(6):2056-2066. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyx187.
5
The Impact of Water, Sanitation and Hygiene Interventions to Control Cholera: A Systematic Review.水、环境卫生和个人卫生干预措施对控制霍乱的影响:一项系统评价
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 18;10(8):e0135676. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135676. eCollection 2015.
6
Feasibility and effectiveness of oral cholera vaccine in an urban endemic setting in Bangladesh: a cluster randomised open-label trial.孟加拉国城市流行地区口服霍乱疫苗的可行性和有效性:一项整群随机开放标签试验。
Lancet. 2015 Oct 3;386(10001):1362-1371. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)61140-0. Epub 2015 Jul 9.
7
Updated global burden of cholera in endemic countries.流行国家霍乱的全球负担最新情况。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015 Jun 4;9(6):e0003832. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003832. eCollection 2015.
8
Post-licensure deployment of oral cholera vaccines: a systematic review.口服霍乱疫苗上市后应用:一项系统评价
Bull World Health Organ. 2014 Dec 1;92(12):881-93. doi: 10.2471/BLT.14.139949. Epub 2014 Sep 29.
9
Coverage and cost of a large oral cholera vaccination program in a high-risk cholera endemic urban population in Dhaka, Bangladesh.在孟加拉国达卡高风险霍乱流行城市人口中,大规模口服霍乱疫苗接种计划的覆盖范围和成本。
Vaccine. 2013 Dec 9;31(51):6058-64. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.10.021. Epub 2013 Oct 22.
10
5 year efficacy of a bivalent killed whole-cell oral cholera vaccine in Kolkata, India: a cluster-randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.印度加尔各答两价口服霍乱全细胞疫苗 5 年有效性:一项集群随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2013 Dec;13(12):1050-6. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(13)70273-1. Epub 2013 Oct 18.