Suppr超能文献

口服霍乱疫苗预防霍乱。

Oral killed cholera vaccines for preventing cholera.

机构信息

Health Systems and Population Studies Division, icddr,b, Dhaka, Bangladesh.

College of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jan 10;1(1):CD014573. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014573.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cholera causes acute watery diarrhoea and death if not properly treated. Outbreaks occur in areas with poor sanitation, including refugee camps. Several vaccines have been developed and tested over the last 50 years. This is an update of a Cochrane review, originally published in 1998, which explored the effects of all vaccines for preventing cholera. This review examines oral vaccines made from killed bacteria.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness and safety of the available World Health Organization (WHO)-prequalified oral killed cholera vaccines among children and adults.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group Specialized Register; CENTRAL, MEDLINE; Embase; LILACS; and two trials registers (February 2023).

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), including cluster-RCTs. There were no restrictions on the age and sex of the participants or the setting of the study. We considered any available WHO-prequalified oral killed cholera vaccine as an intervention. The control group was given a placebo, another vaccine, or no vaccine. The outcomes were related to vaccine effectiveness and safety. We included articles published in English only.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently applied the inclusion criteria and extracted data from included studies. We assessed the risk of bias using the Cochrane ROB 1 assessment tool. We used the generic inverse variance and a random-effects model meta-analysis to estimate the pooled effect of the interventions. We assessed the certainty of the evidence using the GRADE approach. For vaccine effectiveness (VE), we converted the overall risk ratio (RR) to vaccine effectiveness using the formula: VE = (1 - RR) x 100%.

MAIN RESULTS

Five RCTs, reported in 12 records, with 462,754 participants, met the inclusion criteria. We identified trials on whole-cell plus recombinant vaccine (WC-rBS vaccine (Dukoral)) from Peru and trials on bivalent whole-cell vaccine (BivWC (Shanchol)) vaccine from India and Bangladesh. We did not identify any trials on other BivWC vaccines (Euvichol/Euvichol-Plus), or Hillchol. Two doses of Dukoral with or without a booster dose reduces cases of cholera at two-year follow-up in a general population of children and adults, and at five-month follow-up in an adult male population (overall VE 76%; RR 0.24, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.08 to 0.65; 2 trials, 16,423 participants; high-certainty evidence). Two doses of Shanchol reduces cases of cholera at one-year follow-up (overall VE 37%; RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.47 to 0.85; 2 trials, 241,631 participants; high-certainty evidence), at two-year follow-up (overall VE 64%; RR 0.36, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.81; 2 trials, 168,540 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), and at five-year follow-up (overall VE 80%; RR 0.20, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.26; 1 trial, 54,519 participants; high-certainty evidence). A single dose of Shanchol reduces cases of cholera at six-month follow-up (overall VE 40%; RR 0.60, 95% CI 0.47 to 0.77; 1 trial, 204,700 participants; high-certainty evidence), and at two-year follow-up (overall VE 39%; RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.70; 1 trial, 204,700 participants; high-certainty evidence). A single dose of Shanchol also reduces cases of severe dehydrating cholera at six-month follow-up (overall VE 63%; RR 0.37, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.50; 1 trial, 204,700 participants; high-certainty evidence), and at two-year follow-up (overall VE 50%; RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.60; 1 trial, 204,700 participants; high-certainty evidence). We found no differences in the reporting of adverse events due to vaccination between the vaccine and control/placebo groups.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Two doses of Dukoral reduces cases of cholera at two-year follow-up. Two doses of Shanchol reduces cases of cholera at five-year follow-up, and a single dose of Shanchol reduces cases of cholera at two-year follow-up. Overall, the vaccines were safe and well-tolerated. We found no trials on other BivWC vaccines (Euvichol/Euvichol-Plus). However, BivWC products (Shanchol, Euvichol/Euvichol-Plus) are considered to produce comparable vibriocidal responses. Therefore, it is reasonable to apply the results from Shanchol trials to the other BivWC products (Euvichol/Euvichol-Plus).

摘要

背景

霍乱如果得不到适当治疗,会导致急性水样腹泻和死亡。暴发发生在卫生条件差的地区,包括难民营。过去 50 年来,已经开发并测试了几种疫苗。这是对最初发表于 1998 年的 Cochrane 综述的更新,该综述探讨了预防霍乱的所有疫苗的效果。本综述检查了由死细菌制成的口服疫苗。

目的

评估现有世界卫生组织 (WHO) 资格预审的口服灭活霍乱疫苗在儿童和成人中的有效性和安全性。

检索方法

我们检索了 Cochrane 传染病组专业注册库;CENTRAL、MEDLINE、Embase、LILACS 和两个试验注册库(2023 年 2 月)。

选择标准

我们纳入了随机对照试验 (RCT),包括簇 RCT。对参与者的年龄、性别和研究地点没有限制。我们将任何可用的 WHO 资格预审的口服灭活霍乱疫苗视为干预措施。对照组接受安慰剂、另一种疫苗或不接种疫苗。结局与疫苗有效性和安全性相关。我们仅纳入发表英文的文章。

数据收集和分析

两名综述作者独立应用纳入标准并从纳入的研究中提取数据。我们使用 Cochrane ROB 1 评估工具评估偏倚风险。我们使用通用逆方差和随机效应模型荟萃分析来估计干预措施的汇总效果。我们使用 GRADE 方法评估证据的确定性。对于疫苗有效性 (VE),我们使用公式将总体风险比 (RR) 转换为疫苗有效性:VE = (1 - RR) x 100%。

主要结果

五项 RCT 报告了 12 份记录,涉及 462754 名参与者,符合纳入标准。我们确定了来自秘鲁的全细胞加重组疫苗(Dukoral)和来自印度和孟加拉国的双价全细胞疫苗(BivWC(Shanchol))的试验。我们没有发现任何关于其他双价全细胞疫苗(Euvichol/Euvichol-Plus)或 Hillchol 的试验。两剂 Dukoral 加或不加加强剂量可降低一般人群儿童和成人两年随访时以及成年男性五个月随访时的霍乱病例数(总体 VE 为 76%;RR 为 0.24,95%置信区间 [CI] 为 0.08 至 0.65;2 项试验,16423 名参与者;高确定性证据)。两剂 Shanchol 可降低一年随访时的霍乱病例数(总体 VE 为 37%;RR 为 0.63,95%CI 为 0.47 至 0.85;2 项试验,241631 名参与者;高确定性证据),两年随访时的霍乱病例数(总体 VE 为 64%;RR 为 0.36,95%CI 为 0.16 至 0.81;2 项试验,168540 名参与者;中等确定性证据),以及五年随访时的霍乱病例数(总体 VE 为 80%;RR 为 0.20,95%CI 为 0.15 至 0.26;1 项试验,54519 名参与者;高确定性证据)。一剂 Shanchol 可降低六个月随访时的霍乱病例数(总体 VE 为 40%;RR 为 0.60,95%CI 为 0.47 至 0.77;1 项试验,204700 名参与者;高确定性证据)和两年随访时的霍乱病例数(总体 VE 为 39%;RR 为 0.61,95%CI 为 0.53 至 0.70;1 项试验,204700 名参与者;高确定性证据)。一剂 Shanchol 还可降低六个月随访时严重脱水性霍乱的病例数(总体 VE 为 63%;RR 为 0.37,95%CI 为 0.28 至 0.50;1 项试验,204700 名参与者;高确定性证据)和两年随访时的霍乱病例数(总体 VE 为 50%;RR 为 0.50,95%CI 为 0.42 至 0.60;1 项试验,204700 名参与者;高确定性证据)。我们未发现疫苗组和对照组/安慰剂组在疫苗接种相关不良事件的报告上存在差异。

结论

两剂 Dukoral 可降低两年随访时的霍乱病例数。两剂 Shanchol 可降低五年随访时的霍乱病例数,一剂 Shanchol 可降低两年随访时的霍乱病例数。总体而言,疫苗安全且耐受良好。我们未发现关于其他双价全细胞疫苗(Euvichol/Euvichol-Plus)的试验。然而,双价全细胞疫苗产品(Shanchol、Euvichol/Euvichol-Plus)被认为可产生相当的杀菌反应。因此,将 Shanchol 试验的结果应用于其他双价全细胞疫苗(Euvichol/Euvichol-Plus)是合理的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0afc/10777452/5f1b81d34e30/tCD014573-FIG-01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验