• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A risk model for the prediction of skin tears in aged care residents: A prospective cohort study.老年人皮肤撕裂风险预测模型:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Int Wound J. 2019 Feb;16(1):52-63. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12985. Epub 2018 Sep 2.
2
External validation of a predictive model for aged-related skin tears in Fitzpatrick skin types I-IV cohort.对预测模型在 Fitzpatrick 皮肤类型 I-IV 队列中老年人皮肤撕裂的外部验证。
Int Wound J. 2024 Aug;21(8):e70031. doi: 10.1111/iwj.70031.
3
Clinical purpura and elastosis and their correlation with skin tears in an aged population.临床紫癜和弹性组织变性及其与老年人群皮肤撕裂的相关性。
Arch Dermatol Res. 2019 Apr;311(3):231-247. doi: 10.1007/s00403-019-01899-9. Epub 2019 Feb 20.
4
Models for predicting skin tears: A comparison.预测皮肤撕裂的模型:比较。
Int Wound J. 2020 Jun;17(3):823-830. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13340. Epub 2020 Mar 15.
5
Risk scoring tool for forearm skin tears in Japanese older adults: A prospective cohort study.用于日本老年人前臂皮肤撕裂的风险评分工具:一项前瞻性队列研究。
J Tissue Viability. 2021 May;30(2):155-160. doi: 10.1016/j.jtv.2021.02.010. Epub 2021 Mar 2.
6
The development and testing of a skin tear risk assessment tool.皮肤撕裂风险评估工具的开发与测试。
Int Wound J. 2017 Feb;14(1):97-103. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12561. Epub 2015 Dec 22.
7
Identification of risk factors associated with the development of skin tears in hospitalised older persons: a case-control study.住院老年人皮肤撕裂伤发生相关危险因素的识别:一项病例对照研究。
Int Wound J. 2016 Dec;13(6):1246-1251. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12490. Epub 2015 Sep 24.
8
Incidence of skin tears in the extremities among elderly patients at a long-term medical facility in Japan: A prospective cohort study.日本一家长期医疗机构中老年患者四肢皮肤撕裂的发生率:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2015 Aug;15(8):1058-63. doi: 10.1111/ggi.12405. Epub 2014 Nov 19.
9
Malnutrition is independently associated with skin tears in hospital inpatient setting-Findings of a 6-year point prevalence audit.营养不良与住院患者皮肤撕裂独立相关——一项 6 年时点患病率的审计研究结果。
Int Wound J. 2018 Aug;15(4):527-533. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12893. Epub 2018 May 24.
10
Prevalence of skin tears in the extremities in inpatients at a hospital in Denmark.丹麦某医院住院患者四肢皮肤撕裂伤的发生率。
Int Wound J. 2018 Apr;15(2):212-217. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12847. Epub 2018 Feb 21.

引用本文的文献

1
External validation of a predictive model for aged-related skin tears in Fitzpatrick skin types I-IV cohort.对预测模型在 Fitzpatrick 皮肤类型 I-IV 队列中老年人皮肤撕裂的外部验证。
Int Wound J. 2024 Aug;21(8):e70031. doi: 10.1111/iwj.70031.
2
Knowledge status of skin tear prevention and its demographic and occupational influencing factors: A National cross-sectional survey among nurses.皮肤撕裂预防的知识现状及其人口统计学和职业影响因素:一项针对护士的全国性横断面调查。
J Adv Nurs. 2025 Mar;81(3):1412-1422. doi: 10.1111/jan.16353. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
3
Effects of a leave-on product on the strength of the dermoepidermal junction: An exploratory, intraindividual, randomized controlled trial in older adults with dry skin.一款免洗产品对皮肤表皮连接处强度的影响:一项针对老年干性皮肤个体的探索性、自身对照、随机对照试验。
Health Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 19;7(3):e1985. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.1985. eCollection 2024 Mar.
4
Relationship between dry skin and pressure injury in older patients: A multicentre cross-sectional survey in China.老年人皮肤干燥与压力性损伤的关系:中国多中心横断面调查。
Int Wound J. 2023 May;20(5):1402-1417. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13993. Epub 2022 Oct 28.
5
Sampling the skin surface chemistry for diagnosis and prognosis.采样皮肤表面化学物质用于诊断和预后。
Wound Repair Regen. 2022 Jul;30(4):509-525. doi: 10.1111/wrr.13030. Epub 2022 Jun 17.
6
Models for predicting skin tears: A comparison.预测皮肤撕裂的模型:比较。
Int Wound J. 2020 Jun;17(3):823-830. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13340. Epub 2020 Mar 15.
7
Exploring the prevalence and management of wounds for people with dementia in long-term care.探讨长期护理中痴呆症患者伤口的患病率和管理。
Int Wound J. 2020 Jun;17(3):650-659. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13325. Epub 2020 Feb 14.
8
ISTAP classification for skin tears: Validation for Brazilian Portuguese.ISTAP 分类法在皮肤撕脱伤中的应用:巴西葡萄牙语验证。
Int Wound J. 2020 Apr;17(2):310-316. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13271. Epub 2019 Nov 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Prevalence of skin tears in the extremities among elderly residents at a nursing home in Denmark.丹麦一家养老院老年居民四肢皮肤撕裂的患病率。
J Wound Care. 2017 Feb;26(Sup2):S32-S36. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2017.26.Sup2.S32.
2
Incidence of Skin Tears and Risk Factors: A Systematic Literature Review.皮肤撕裂伤的发生率及危险因素:一项系统文献综述。
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2017 Jan/Feb;44(1):29-33. doi: 10.1097/WON.0000000000000288.
3
Skin property can predict the development of skin tears among elderly patients: a prospective cohort study.皮肤特性可预测老年患者皮肤撕裂的发生:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Int Wound J. 2017 Aug;14(4):691-697. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12675. Epub 2016 Oct 19.
4
Measurement of morphological and physiological skin properties in aged care residents: a test-retest reliability pilot study.老年护理机构居民皮肤形态学和生理学特性的测量:一项重测信度试点研究。
Int Wound J. 2017 Apr;14(2):420-429. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12621. Epub 2016 May 24.
5
The development and testing of a skin tear risk assessment tool.皮肤撕裂风险评估工具的开发与测试。
Int Wound J. 2017 Feb;14(1):97-103. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12561. Epub 2015 Dec 22.
6
Identification of risk factors associated with the development of skin tears in hospitalised older persons: a case-control study.住院老年人皮肤撕裂伤发生相关危险因素的识别:一项病例对照研究。
Int Wound J. 2016 Dec;13(6):1246-1251. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12490. Epub 2015 Sep 24.
7
Reliable assessment of forearm photoageing by high-frequency ultrasound: a cross-sectional study.高频超声对前臂光老化的可靠评估:一项横断面研究。
Int J Cosmet Sci. 2016 Apr;38(2):170-7. doi: 10.1111/ics.12272. Epub 2015 Sep 30.
8
A review of patient and skin characteristics associated with skin tears.对与皮肤撕裂相关的患者和皮肤特征的综述。
J Wound Care. 2015 Sep;24(9):406-14. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2015.24.9.406.
9
Development and Validation of a Clinical Scale for the Evaluation of Forearm Skin Photoaging.用于评估前臂皮肤光老化的临床量表的开发与验证
J Cutan Med Surg. 2015 Jul-Aug;19(4):380-7. doi: 10.1177/1203475415574946. Epub 2015 Mar 3.
10
Natural and sun-induced aging of human skin.人类皮肤的自然老化和光老化。
Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2015 Jan 5;5(1):a015370. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a015370.

老年人皮肤撕裂风险预测模型:一项前瞻性队列研究。

A risk model for the prediction of skin tears in aged care residents: A prospective cohort study.

机构信息

School of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.

Silver Chain Group, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.

出版信息

Int Wound J. 2019 Feb;16(1):52-63. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12985. Epub 2018 Sep 2.

DOI:10.1111/iwj.12985
PMID:30175484
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7948554/
Abstract

The objective of this study was to construct a predictive model to identify aged care residents at risk of future skin tears. Extensive data about individual characteristics, skin characteristics, and skin properties were gathered from 173 participants at baseline and at 6 months. A predictive model, developed using multivariable logistic regression, identified five variables that significantly predicted the risk of skin tear at 6 months. These included: a history of skin tears in the previous 12 months (OR 3.82 [1.64-8.90], P = 0.002), purpura ≤20 mm in size (OR 3.64 [1.42-9.35], P = 0.007), a history of falls in the previous 3 months (OR 3.37 [1.54-7.41], P = 0.002), clinical manifestations of elastosis (OR 3.19 [1.38-7.38], P = 0.007), and male gender (OR 3.08 [1.22-7.77], P = 0.017). The predictive model yielded an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.854 with an 81.7% sensitivity and an 81.4% specificity. This predictive model could inform a simple but promising bedside tool for identifying older individuals at risk of skin tears.

摘要

本研究旨在构建一个预测模型,以识别有未来皮肤撕裂风险的老年护理居民。在基线和 6 个月时,从 173 名参与者那里收集了大量关于个体特征、皮肤特征和皮肤特性的详细数据。使用多变量逻辑回归开发的预测模型确定了五个变量,这些变量显著预测了 6 个月时皮肤撕裂的风险。这些变量包括:过去 12 个月内有皮肤撕裂史(OR 3.82 [1.64-8.90],P = 0.002)、大小≤20 毫米的瘀斑(OR 3.64 [1.42-9.35],P = 0.007)、过去 3 个月内有跌倒史(OR 3.37 [1.54-7.41],P = 0.002)、弹性组织临床表现(OR 3.19 [1.38-7.38],P = 0.007)和男性(OR 3.08 [1.22-7.77],P = 0.017)。预测模型的受试者工作特征曲线下面积为 0.854,灵敏度为 81.7%,特异性为 81.4%。该预测模型可以为识别有皮肤撕裂风险的老年人提供一种简单但有前途的床边工具。