Department of Surgery, New York-Presbyterian and Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York.
Department of Healthcare Policy and Research, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
JAMA Surg. 2018 Jun 1;153(6):511-517. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.6202.
Attrition in general surgery residency remains high, and attrition that occurs in the later years is the most worrisome. Although several studies have retrospectively investigated the timing of attrition, no study to date has prospectively evaluated a national cohort of residents to understand which residents are at risk for attrition and at what point during residency.
To prospectively evaluate individual resident and programmatic factors associated with the timing of attrition during general surgery residency.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This longitudinal, national cohort study administered a survey to all categorical general surgery interns from the class of 2007-2008 during their first 30 days of residency and linked the data with 9-year follow-up data assessing program completion. Data were collected from June 1, 2007, through June 30, 2016.
Kaplan-Meier curves evaluating time to attrition during the 9 years after the start of residency.
Among our sample of 836 residents (306 women [36.6%] and 528 men [63.2%]; gender unknown in 2), cumulative survival analysis demonstrated overall attrition for the cohort of 20.8% (n = 164). Attrition was highest in the first postgraduate year (67.6% [n = 111]; absolute rate, 13.3%) but continued during the next 6 years, albeit at a lower rate. Beginning in the first year, survival analysis demonstrated higher attrition among Hispanic compared with non-Hispanic residents (21.1% vs 12.4%; P = .04) and at military programs compared with academic or community programs after year 1 (32.3% vs 11.0% or 13.5%; P = .01). Beginning in year 4 of residency, higher attrition was encountered among women compared with men (23.3% vs 17.4%; P = .05); at year 5, at large compared with small programs (26.0% vs 18.4%; P = .04). Race and program location were not associated with attrition.
Although attrition was highest during the internship year, late attrition persists, particularly among women and among residents in large programs. These results provide a framework for timing of interventions in graduate surgical training that target residents most at risk for late attrition.
普通外科住院医师的流失率仍然很高,而后期流失率是最令人担忧的。尽管有几项研究回顾性地调查了流失的时间,但迄今为止尚无研究前瞻性地评估全国范围内的住院医师群体,以了解哪些住院医师存在流失风险以及在住院期间的哪个阶段存在流失风险。
前瞻性评估普通外科住院医师住院期间与流失时间相关的个体住院医师和计划因素。
设计、地点和参与者:这项纵向、全国性的队列研究在住院医师的前 30 天内向 2007-2008 年普通外科住院医师的所有住院医师实习生进行了一项调查,并将数据与 9 年的后续数据进行了链接,这些数据评估了课程完成情况。数据收集于 2007 年 6 月 1 日至 2016 年 6 月 30 日。
评估住院后 9 年期间流失时间的 Kaplan-Meier 曲线。
在我们的 836 名住院医师样本中(306 名女性[36.6%]和 528 名男性[63.2%];性别不详 2 人),累积生存分析显示该队列的总体流失率为 20.8%(n=164)。第一年的住院医师毕业后,流失率最高(67.6%[n=111];绝对率,13.3%),但在接下来的 6 年中仍在继续,尽管流失率较低。从第一年开始,生存分析显示与非西班牙裔居民相比,西班牙裔居民的流失率更高(21.1%比 12.4%;P=.04),与学术或社区项目相比,军事项目的流失率更高(第一年为 32.3%,而学术或社区项目为 11.0%或 13.5%;P=.01)。从住院医师第四年开始,女性的流失率高于男性(23.3%比 17.4%;P=.05);第五年,与小项目相比,大项目的流失率更高(26.0%比 18.4%;P=.04)。种族和项目地点与流失无关。
尽管实习年的流失率最高,但后期的流失仍然存在,尤其是在女性和大项目的住院医师中。这些结果为研究生外科培训中针对后期流失风险最高的住院医师的干预时间提供了框架。