Suppr超能文献

基于蓝蓟的复方草药药物与西酞普兰治疗重度抑郁症的疗效比较

Comparing Effectiveness of a Combined Herbal Drug Based on Echium Amoenum with Citalopram in the Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder.

作者信息

Anushiravani Majid, Manteghi Ali A, Taghipur Ali, Eslami Mahdi

机构信息

Department of Persian Medicine, School of Persian and Complementary Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.

Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.

出版信息

Curr Drug Discov Technol. 2019;16(2):232-238. doi: 10.2174/1570163815666180219115844.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

According to new studies, only 60% of depressed patients respond to pharmaceutical treatment while suffering from their side effects. Natural products as adjuvant or alternative therapies should be examined to find safer and more effective ways to cope with depression.

OBJECTIVE

To find out the potential benefits of a combined herbal drug based on Echium amoenum compared with citalopram in the treatment of Major Depressive Disorder.

DESIGN AND SETTING

In psychiatry clinics of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, 50 patients who met the criteria for Major Depressive Disorder based on DSM-5 were studied in a parallel randomized controlled trial.

INTERVENTION

Subjects were randomly assigned to receive Echium amoenum compound syrup (EACS) or citalopram tablet for 8 weeks.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The efficacy of treatments and recurrence of disease were surveyed and compared according to Hamilton depression rating scale at weeks 0, 4, 8, 12.

RESULTS

Patients in both groups of citalopram and EACS showed remarkable reduction in scores of Hamilton questionnaire. At the eighth week of treatment, the mean scores in EACS group were significantly lower than citalopram group (p-value = 0.03). 52% of patients suffered from various complications in citalopram group while just 12% of patients in EACS group reported few complications.

CONCLUSION

Clinical efficacy of this herbal drug was significantly higher than citalopram, and complications were also less and lower in EACS group. Further studies with larger groups and para-clinical assessments such as serologic tests and QEEG would improve our understanding of the impacts and mechanisms of EACS.

摘要

背景

根据新的研究,只有60%的抑郁症患者在接受药物治疗时有效,但同时会遭受副作用。应研究天然产物作为辅助或替代疗法,以找到更安全、更有效的方法来应对抑郁症。

目的

研究基于蓝蓟的复方草药与西酞普兰相比,在治疗重度抑郁症方面的潜在益处。

设计与地点

在马什哈德医科大学的精神病学诊所,对50名符合DSM-5中重度抑郁症标准的患者进行了一项平行随机对照试验。

干预措施

受试者被随机分配接受蓝蓟复方糖浆(EACS)或西酞普兰片,为期8周。

观察指标

在第0、4、8、12周,根据汉密尔顿抑郁量表对治疗效果和疾病复发情况进行调查和比较。

结果

西酞普兰组和EACS组患者的汉密尔顿问卷得分均显著降低。在治疗的第八周,EACS组的平均得分显著低于西酞普兰组(p值 = 0.03)。西酞普兰组52%的患者出现各种并发症,而EACS组只有12%的患者报告有少量并发症。

结论

这种草药药物的临床疗效显著高于西酞普兰,且EACS组的并发症也更少、更轻。通过更大规模的研究以及血清学检测和脑电地形图等临床前评估,将有助于我们更好地理解EACS的作用和机制。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验