Division of Allergy and Immunology, Departments of Pediatrics and Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd., Dallas, TX, 75390-9063, USA.
Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2018 Feb 22;18(3):18. doi: 10.1007/s11882-018-0772-z.
The goal of this review is to provide the reader with an updated summary of published trial data regarding the use of oral immunotherapy (OIT), sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT), and epicutaneous immunotherapy (EPIT) for treatment of IgE-mediated food allergies.
Data from phase 2 trials for treatment of peanut allergy with OIT and EPIT reveal an increase in the threshold of reactivity for peanut-allergic children. Compared to EPIT, OIT promotes a greater increase in the threshold of reactivity; however, adverse events are more common with OIT. OIT, EPIT, and SLIT appear to modulate the immune response for some food-allergic individuals. Data regarding utility for treatment of food allergies regardless of modality is limited to few foods, as is investigation into treatment of food-allergic infants, young children, and adults. Future trials are likely to focus on young children, food allergies other than peanut, and treatment of multifood-allergic individuals.
本文旨在为读者提供关于口服免疫疗法(OIT)、舌下免疫疗法(SLIT)和经皮免疫疗法(EPIT)治疗 IgE 介导的食物过敏的已发表试验数据的最新总结。
针对花生过敏的 OIT 和 EPIT 治疗的 2 期试验数据显示,花生过敏儿童的反应阈值增加。与 EPIT 相比,OIT 可更大程度地提高反应阈值,但 OIT 更常见不良反应。OIT、EPIT 和 SLIT 似乎可调节某些食物过敏个体的免疫反应。无论采用哪种方式,关于治疗食物过敏的有效性的数据仅限于少数食物,并且针对食物过敏婴儿、幼儿和成人的治疗的研究也很有限。未来的试验可能集中在幼儿、除花生以外的食物过敏和多食物过敏个体的治疗上。