Evans Nicholas Greig
Department of Philosophy, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, MA, United States.
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2018 Feb 8;6:11. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2018.00011. eCollection 2018.
The Department of Health and Human Services Framework for Guiding Funding Decisions about Proposed Research Involving Enhanced Potential Pandemic Pathogens (PPPs) contains a series of principles for governing the funding and conduct of gain-of-function (GOF) research resulting in the creation of PPPs. In this article, I address one of these principles, governing the replacement of GOF research with alternate experiments. I argue that the principle fails to address the way that different experiments can promote the same values as those promoted by GOF research resulting in PPPs. I then address some objections to this claim, and provide policy recommendations moving forward.
美国卫生与公众服务部关于指导涉及增强型潜在大流行病原体(PPPs)的拟议研究资金决策的框架包含一系列原则,用于管理导致PPPs产生的功能获得(GOF)研究的资金投入和开展。在本文中,我探讨其中一项原则,即关于用替代实验取代GOF研究的原则。我认为该原则未能解决不同实验如何能促进与导致PPPs产生的GOF研究所促进的相同价值的问题。然后我回应了对此观点的一些异议,并提出了未来的政策建议。