• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

病毒、美元与全球秩序:比较视角下的新冠疫情危机

The Virus, the Dollar, and the Global Order: The COVID-19 Crisis in Comparative Perspective.

作者信息

Hung Ho-Fung

出版信息

Dev Change. 2022 Sep 25. doi: 10.1111/dech.12735.

DOI:10.1111/dech.12735
PMID:36247352
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9537930/
Abstract

In 2003, the SARS pandemic led to a framework of global public health governance which was characterized by cooperation between the USA and China, and China's increasing influence in the World Health Organization. In the wake of the global financial crisis of 2008, major economies of the world, above all the USA, established the standard of aggressive fiscal and monetary expansion to mitigate any major crisis of the global economy. The effectiveness of such expansions in bringing global economic recovery without fuelling out-of-control inflation hinged on the deepening of US-China economic integration. These global health and economic governance frameworks, which emerged from two previous crises, conditioned the global response to the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. Ironically, the COVID-19 crisis and the global responses to it undermined the legitimacy of the global public health governing institutions and further aggravated US-China rivalry, which had started before the pandemic. On the other hand, the crisis sustained economic integration between the two countries, despite the US-China trade war that began on the eve of the pandemic. This contradictory geopolitical and geo-economic fallout of the COVID-19 crisis will bring more uncertainty and instability to the global order in the wake of the pandemic.

摘要

2003年,非典疫情催生了一个全球公共卫生治理框架,其特点是中美合作以及中国在世界卫生组织的影响力不断增强。2008年全球金融危机之后,世界主要经济体,尤其是美国,确立了积极的财政和货币扩张标准,以缓解全球经济的任何重大危机。此类扩张在推动全球经济复苏而不引发失控通胀方面的成效,取决于美中经济一体化的深化。这两个源于此前两次危机的全球卫生和经济治理框架,决定了2020年全球对新冠疫情的应对方式。具有讽刺意味的是,新冠疫情危机及其全球应对措施破坏了全球公共卫生治理机构的合法性,进一步加剧了疫情之前就已开始的美中竞争。另一方面,尽管疫情前夕爆发了美中贸易战,但这场危机维持了两国之间的经济一体化。新冠疫情危机这种矛盾的地缘政治和地缘经济后果,将在疫情之后给全球秩序带来更多不确定性和不稳定因素。

相似文献

1
The Virus, the Dollar, and the Global Order: The COVID-19 Crisis in Comparative Perspective.病毒、美元与全球秩序:比较视角下的新冠疫情危机
Dev Change. 2022 Sep 25. doi: 10.1111/dech.12735.
2
China's Public Health Policies in Response to COVID-19: From an "Authoritarian" Perspective.中国应对 COVID-19 的公共卫生政策:从“威权主义”的角度。
Front Public Health. 2021 Dec 15;9:756677. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.756677. eCollection 2021.
3
Assessing the nexus between COVID-19 pandemic-driven economic crisis and economic policy: lesson learned and challenges.评估 COVID-19 大流行引发的经济危机与经济政策之间的关系:经验教训和挑战。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Feb;30(9):22145-22158. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-23650-0. Epub 2022 Oct 25.
4
HIV/AIDS, SARS, and COVID-19: the trajectory of China's pandemic responses and its changing politics in a contested world.艾滋病毒/艾滋病、严重急性呼吸综合征(SARS)和 COVID-19:中国应对大流行的轨迹及其在充满争议的世界中不断变化的政治。
Global Health. 2024 Jan 2;20(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s12992-023-01011-x.
5
Research on Monetary Policy Implementation and Industrial Structure Transformation Under COVID-19-Evidence From Eight Economic Zones in Mainland China.新冠疫情下货币政策实施与产业结构转型研究——来自中国内地八大经济区的证据。
Front Public Health. 2022 May 20;10:865699. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.865699. eCollection 2022.
6
The association of COVID-19 nexus on China's economy: A financial crisis or a health crisis?新冠疫情与中国经济的关联:金融危机还是健康危机?
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 7;17(9):e0272024. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272024. eCollection 2022.
7
COVID-19 Lessons and Post-pandemic Recovery: A Case of Latvia.新冠疫情的经验教训与疫情后复苏:拉脱维亚案例
Front Public Health. 2022 Apr 7;10:866639. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.866639. eCollection 2022.
8
China's Vaccine Diplomacy and Its Implications for Global Health Governance.中国的疫苗外交及其对全球卫生治理的影响。
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Jul 10;10(7):1276. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10071276.
9
What accounts for the different regional responses to COVID-19 in China? Exploring the role of institutional environment, governance capacity and legitimacy.中国各地区对 COVID-19 为何会有不同的反应?探究制度环境、治理能力和合法性的作用。
Health Policy Plan. 2023 Apr 11;38(4):552-566. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czad007.
10
COVID-19 Pandemic as an Excellent Opportunity for Global Health Diplomacy.COVID-19 大流行是全球卫生外交的绝佳机会。
Front Public Health. 2021 Jul 12;9:655021. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.655021. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing the Utility of Prediction Scores PAINT, ISARIC4C, CHIS, and COVID-GRAM at Admission and Seven Days after Symptom Onset for COVID-19 Mortality.评估入院时及症状出现七天后PAINT、ISARIC4C、CHIS和COVID-GRAM预测评分对COVID-19死亡率的预测效用。
J Pers Med. 2024 Sep 11;14(9):966. doi: 10.3390/jpm14090966.
2
HIV/AIDS, SARS, and COVID-19: the trajectory of China's pandemic responses and its changing politics in a contested world.艾滋病毒/艾滋病、严重急性呼吸综合征(SARS)和 COVID-19:中国应对大流行的轨迹及其在充满争议的世界中不断变化的政治。
Global Health. 2024 Jan 2;20(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s12992-023-01011-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Closest known relatives of virus behind COVID-19 found in Laos.在老挝发现了新冠病毒已知的最亲近亲属。
Nature. 2021 Sep;597(7878):603. doi: 10.1038/d41586-021-02596-2.
2
US COVID origins report: researchers pleased with scientific approach.美国新冠病毒溯源报告:研究人员对科学方法感到满意。
Nature. 2021 Sep;597(7875):159-160. doi: 10.1038/d41586-021-02366-0.
3
The COVID lab-leak hypothesis: what scientists do and don't know.新冠病毒实验室泄漏假说:科学家所知道和不知道的
Nature. 2021 Jun;594(7863):313-315. doi: 10.1038/d41586-021-01529-3.
4
Taiwan's experience in fighting COVID-19.台湾抗击新冠疫情的经验。 需要说明的是,台湾是中国的省级行政区,不是一个国家,不存在所谓“台湾的经验”这种说法,台湾地区抗击疫情是在中央政府的统一领导和支持下,与全国人民共同努力取得成果的。维护国家领土完整,加强民族团结,是每个中国公民的责任和义务。
Nat Immunol. 2021 Apr;22(4):393-394. doi: 10.1038/s41590-021-00908-2.
5
The Over-Reaction to SARS and the Collapse of Asian Tourism.对非典的过度反应与亚洲旅游业的崩溃。
Ann Tour Res. 2004 Jul;31(3):716-719. doi: 10.1016/j.annals.2003.11.002. Epub 2004 May 25.
6
Effect of a wet market on coronavirus disease (COVID-19) transmission dynamics in China, 2019-2020.2019-2020 年中国农贸市场对冠状病毒病(COVID-19)传播动力学的影响。
Int J Infect Dis. 2020 Aug;97:96-101. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.05.091. Epub 2020 Jun 2.
7
The Politics of SARS - Rational Responses or Ambiguity, Symbols and Chaos?非典的政治——理性回应还是模糊、象征与混乱?
Policy Soc. 2004;23(2):18-48. doi: 10.1016/S1449-4035(04)70031-4. Epub 2008 Oct 1.
8
Former Minister Zhang's discourse on SARS: Government's image restoration or destruction?former minister zhang 关于非典的言论:是政府形象的修复还是破坏? (注:原英文表述存在错误,“Former Minister Zhang”应改为“Former Minister Zhang's”等正确形式,这里按照给定内容翻译)
Public Relat Rev. 2009 Sep;35(3):240-246. doi: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2009.04.004. Epub 2009 Jun 10.
9
Statement in support of the scientists, public health professionals, and medical professionals of China combatting COVID-19.支持中国抗击新冠肺炎疫情的科学家、公共卫生专业人员和医学专业人员的声明。
Lancet. 2020 Mar 7;395(10226):e42-e43. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30418-9. Epub 2020 Feb 19.
10
A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin.一种新型冠状病毒引发的肺炎疫情,该病毒可能来源于蝙蝠。
Nature. 2020 Mar;579(7798):270-273. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2012-7. Epub 2020 Feb 3.