Suppr超能文献

非动物方法预测皮肤致敏性(一):欧洲化妆品协会数据库<sup/>。

Non-animal methods to predict skin sensitization (I): the Cosmetics Europe database<sup/>.

机构信息

a seh consulting + services , Paderborn , Germany.

b NIH/NIEHS/DNTP/NICEATM , Research Triangle Park , NC , USA.

出版信息

Crit Rev Toxicol. 2018 May;48(5):344-358. doi: 10.1080/10408444.2018.1429385. Epub 2018 Feb 23.

Abstract

Cosmetics Europe, the European Trade Association for the cosmetics and personal care industry, is conducting a multi-phase program to develop regulatory accepted, animal-free testing strategies enabling the cosmetics industry to conduct safety assessments. Based on a systematic evaluation of test methods for skin sensitization, five non-animal test methods (DPRA (Direct Peptide Reactivity Assay), KeratinoSens, h-CLAT (human cell line activation test), U-SENS, SENS-IS) were selected for inclusion in a comprehensive database of 128 substances. Existing data were compiled and completed with newly generated data, the latter amounting to one-third of all data. The database was complemented with human and local lymph node assay (LLNA) reference data, physicochemical properties and use categories, and thoroughly curated. Focused on the availability of human data, the substance selection resulted nevertheless resulted in a high diversity of chemistries in terms of physico-chemical property ranges and use categories. Predictivities of skin sensitization potential and potency, where applicable, were calculated for the LLNA as compared to human data and for the individual test methods compared to both human and LLNA reference data. In addition, various aspects of applicability of the test methods were analyzed. Due to its high level of curation, comprehensiveness, and completeness, we propose our database as a point of reference for the evaluation and development of testing strategies, as done for example in the associated work of Kleinstreuer et al. We encourage the community to use it to meet the challenge of conducting skin sensitization safety assessment without generating new animal data.

摘要

欧洲化妆品协会(Cosmetics Europe)是化妆品和个人护理行业的欧洲贸易协会,正在开展一个多阶段计划,旨在开发监管机构认可的、无动物的测试策略,使化妆品行业能够进行安全性评估。该计划基于对皮肤致敏性测试方法的系统评估,选择了五种非动物测试方法(DPRA(直接肽反应性测定法)、KeratinoSens、h-CLAT(人细胞系激活测试)、U-SENS、SENS-IS)纳入一个包含 128 种物质的综合数据库中。现有的数据进行了汇编,并补充了新生成的数据,后者占所有数据的三分之一。该数据库补充了人体和局部淋巴结试验(LLNA)的参考数据、物理化学性质和使用类别,并进行了彻底的整理。由于专注于人体数据的可用性,尽管如此,物质的选择仍然导致在物理化学性质范围和使用类别方面具有很高的化学多样性。对于 LLNA 与人体数据以及对于个体测试方法与人体和 LLNA 参考数据,计算了皮肤致敏潜力和效力的预测值(如果适用)。此外,还分析了测试方法的各个适用性方面。由于其高度的整理、全面性和完整性,我们建议将我们的数据库作为评估和开发测试策略的参考点,例如在 Kleinstreuer 等人的相关工作中所做的那样。我们鼓励社区使用它来应对在不产生新动物数据的情况下进行皮肤致敏安全性评估的挑战。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验