Oslo Metropolitan University.
University of Oslo.
Br J Sociol. 2019 Mar;70(2):569-588. doi: 10.1111/1468-4446.12356. Epub 2018 Feb 24.
What produces the power of senior civil servants at ministries of finance, positioned at the top of the bureaucratic hierarchy? Max Weber has claimed that a hierarchical organization, meritocratic recruitment and procedural work provide bureaucracies with legitimacy. In particular he insisted on the role of Fachwissen (disciplinary knowledge) obtained through formal education. However, he also argued for the role of Dienstwissen, forms of knowledge and skills stemming from the experience of service in itself. Weber did not elaborate on this concept in detail, and few analysts of governmental expertise have examined this notion. We draw on the practice-turn in sociology, combining the study of governmental expertise with micro-sociological studies of administrative practices. By analysing interviews with 48 senior civil servants at the British, French and Norwegian ministries of finance about their daily practices, this article demonstrates that bureaucratic note-writing and the procedural evaluation of such notes constitute a key form of expertise that yields authority. The study provides an analytical framework for understanding what administrative expertise consists of, how it is integral to procedural work, the forms bureaucratic hierarchies take in practice and how these three dimensions provide authority.
财政部高级公务员的权力来自何处?处于官僚等级制顶层的他们拥有怎样的权威?马克斯·韦伯曾声称,等级组织、择优录用和程序化工作为官僚机构提供了合法性。他特别强调了通过正规教育获得的 Fachwissen(学科知识)的作用。然而,他也主张 Dienstwissen(服务经验本身所产生的知识和技能形式)的作用。韦伯没有详细阐述这个概念,很少有政府专门知识的分析者研究过这个概念。我们借鉴了社会学中的实践转向,将政府专门知识的研究与行政实践的微观社会学研究结合起来。通过分析对英国、法国和挪威财政部的 48 名高级公务员关于其日常实践的访谈,本文表明,官僚主义的笔记写作和对这些笔记的程序性评估构成了一种关键的专门知识形式,它产生了权威。该研究提供了一个分析框架,用于理解行政专门知识的构成、它如何成为程序性工作的组成部分、实践中官僚等级制采取的形式以及这三个维度如何提供权威。