Emwas Abdul-Hamid, Saccenti Edoardo, Gao Xin, McKay Ryan T, Dos Santos Vitor A P Martins, Roy Raja, Wishart David S
Imaging and Characterization Core Lab, KAUST, Thuwal, 23955-6900, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Laboratory of Systems and Synthetic Biology, Wageningen University and Research, Stippeneng 4, 6708 WE, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Metabolomics. 2018;14(3):31. doi: 10.1007/s11306-018-1321-4. Epub 2018 Feb 12.
H NMR spectra from urine can yield information-rich data sets that offer important insights into many biological and biochemical phenomena. However, the quality and utility of these insights can be profoundly affected by how the NMR spectra are processed and interpreted. For instance, if the NMR spectra are incorrectly referenced or inconsistently aligned, the identification of many compounds will be incorrect. If the NMR spectra are mis-phased or if the baseline correction is flawed, the estimated concentrations of many compounds will be systematically biased. Furthermore, because NMR permits the measurement of concentrations spanning up to five orders of magnitude, several problems can arise with data analysis. For instance, signals originating from the most abundant metabolites may prove to be the least biologically relevant while signals arising from the least abundant metabolites may prove to be the most important but hardest to accurately and precisely measure. As a result, a number of data processing techniques such as scaling, transformation and normalization are often required to address these issues. Therefore, proper processing of NMR data is a critical step to correctly extract useful information in any NMR-based metabolomic study. In this review we highlight the significance, advantages and disadvantages of different NMR spectral processing steps that are common to most NMR-based metabolomic studies of urine. These include: chemical shift referencing, phase and baseline correction, spectral alignment, spectral binning, scaling and normalization. We also provide a set of recommendations for best practices regarding spectral and data processing for NMR-based metabolomic studies of biofluids, with a particular focus on urine.
尿液的氢核磁共振(¹H NMR)光谱能够产生信息丰富的数据集,为许多生物学和生物化学现象提供重要见解。然而,这些见解的质量和实用性会受到核磁共振光谱处理和解释方式的深刻影响。例如,如果核磁共振光谱的参考不正确或对齐不一致,许多化合物的鉴定将会出错。如果核磁共振光谱的相位错误或基线校正存在缺陷,许多化合物的估计浓度将出现系统性偏差。此外,由于核磁共振能够测量跨越五个数量级的浓度,数据分析可能会出现几个问题。例如,源自最丰富代谢物的信号可能证明与生物学相关性最低,而源自最不丰富代谢物的信号可能证明是最重要但最难准确测量的。因此,通常需要一些数据处理技术,如缩放、变换和归一化来解决这些问题。所以,在任何基于核磁共振的代谢组学研究中,正确处理核磁共振数据是正确提取有用信息的关键步骤。在这篇综述中,我们强调了不同核磁共振光谱处理步骤的重要性、优点和缺点,这些步骤在大多数基于核磁共振的尿液代谢组学研究中都很常见。这些步骤包括:化学位移参考、相位和基线校正、光谱对齐、光谱分箱、缩放和归一化。我们还针对基于核磁共振的生物流体代谢组学研究,特别是尿液的光谱和数据处理,提供了一套最佳实践建议。