Cobeanu Oana, David Daniel
Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Babeş-Bolyai University, No. 37, Republicii Street, 400015, Cluj-Napoca, Cluj, Romania.
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, USA.
J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2018 Dec;25(4):335-355. doi: 10.1007/s10880-017-9526-7.
Cognitive and behavioral interventions (CBI) have been used for breast cancer patients with various stages of the disease or undergoing different treatments. However, no quantitative review has summarized their efficacy on the side effects of treatment, distress, and quality of life in the acute treatment setting after diagnosis. This meta-analysis synthesizes data from 19 randomized clinical trials in order to: (a) provide an estimation of overall effect of CBI in breast cancer patients during treatment for breast cancer, i.e., neo-adjuvant and adjuvant treatment; (b) provide average effect sizes on side effects of treatment, distress, and quality of life; and (c) test possible moderators of effect size. The results show that CBI yielded a small effect size overall, specifically on general side effects of treatment, nausea, vomiting, distress, and quality of life. Individual and behavioral interventions seem to elicit better results on distress and on general side effects of treatment, respectively. While more studies are needed with regard to specific side effects (i.e., fatigue, pain, and sleep disturbance), the overall results clearly support the use of CBI in breast cancer patients during treatment.
认知行为干预(CBI)已被用于患有不同疾病阶段或正在接受不同治疗的乳腺癌患者。然而,尚无定量综述总结其在诊断后的急性治疗环境中对治疗副作用、痛苦和生活质量的疗效。这项荟萃分析综合了19项随机临床试验的数据,目的是:(a)估计CBI在乳腺癌患者接受乳腺癌治疗(即新辅助治疗和辅助治疗)期间的总体效果;(b)提供治疗副作用、痛苦和生活质量的平均效应量;(c)测试效应量可能的调节因素。结果表明,CBI总体产生的效应量较小,特别是对治疗的一般副作用、恶心、呕吐、痛苦和生活质量。个体干预和行为干预似乎分别在痛苦和治疗的一般副作用方面产生更好的效果。虽然需要更多关于特定副作用(即疲劳、疼痛和睡眠障碍)的研究,但总体结果明确支持在治疗期间对乳腺癌患者使用CBI。