• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用功能近红外光谱技术揭示超自然小说理解的神经机制。

Unveiling the neural mechanisms of supernatural fiction comprehension using fNIRS.

作者信息

Xu Xiaodong, Jia Cheng, Chen Kang, Chen Lijuan

机构信息

School of Foreign Languages and Cultures, Nanjing Normal University, 210097, Nanjing, China.

School of Foreign Studies, Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications, 210023, Nanjing, China.

出版信息

NPJ Sci Learn. 2025 May 24;10(1):32. doi: 10.1038/s41539-025-00327-0.

DOI:10.1038/s41539-025-00327-0
PMID:40413186
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12103558/
Abstract

This study used fNIRS (functional near-infrared spectroscopy) to investigate the neural mechanisms underlying the processing of supernatural fiction, featuring either fictional or realistic characters, compared to real-world stories. Participants' brain activations were recorded while they read supernatural/realistic scenarios. Results showed that reading supernatural scenarios activated sensorimotor and the related frontal regions, compared to reading realistic scenarios. Furthermore, reading supernatural texts with unexpected realistic characters resulted in additional brain activity in the left IFG, compared to reading supernatural texts with expected fictional characters. Mediation analyses indicated that the activation of the left sensorimotor cortex during the reading of supernatural scenarios is mediated by readers' social cognition. Moreover, there was increased functional connectivity among different brain regions within the simulation network, and between the simulation network and the social cognition network, during the understanding of supernatural narratives. These findings suggest that simulation is crucial for readers to comprehend and interpret supernatural stories.

摘要

本研究使用功能近红外光谱技术(fNIRS)来探究与现实世界故事相比,以虚构或现实角色为特色的超自然小说加工背后的神经机制。在参与者阅读超自然/现实场景时记录他们的大脑激活情况。结果显示,与阅读现实场景相比,阅读超自然场景会激活感觉运动及相关的额叶区域。此外,与阅读带有预期虚构角色的超自然文本相比,阅读带有意外现实角色的超自然文本会导致左侧额下回额外的大脑活动。中介分析表明,在阅读超自然场景时左侧感觉运动皮层的激活是由读者的社会认知介导的。此外,在理解超自然叙事过程中,模拟网络内不同脑区之间以及模拟网络与社会认知网络之间的功能连接增加。这些发现表明,模拟对于读者理解和解释超自然故事至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5509/12103558/04ea868acc63/41539_2025_327_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5509/12103558/1e84661e6fe0/41539_2025_327_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5509/12103558/447d42b1fe7f/41539_2025_327_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5509/12103558/2be738cda258/41539_2025_327_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5509/12103558/04ea868acc63/41539_2025_327_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5509/12103558/1e84661e6fe0/41539_2025_327_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5509/12103558/447d42b1fe7f/41539_2025_327_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5509/12103558/2be738cda258/41539_2025_327_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5509/12103558/04ea868acc63/41539_2025_327_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Unveiling the neural mechanisms of supernatural fiction comprehension using fNIRS.使用功能近红外光谱技术揭示超自然小说理解的神经机制。
NPJ Sci Learn. 2025 May 24;10(1):32. doi: 10.1038/s41539-025-00327-0.
2
"Sometimers, Alzheimer's? I love that! That's definitely me": Readers' Responses to Fictional Dementia Narratives.“有时候,阿尔茨海默病?我喜欢!那肯定是我”:读者对虚构的痴呆叙事的反应。
Gerontologist. 2023 Dec 15;63(10):1610-1618. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnad055.
3
When Fiction Is Just as Real as Fact: No Differences in Reading Behavior between Stories Believed to be Based on True or Fictional Events.当虚构与事实一样真实时:人们阅读被认为基于真实或虚构事件的故事时,阅读行为并无差异。
Front Psychol. 2017 Sep 20;8:1618. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01618. eCollection 2017.
4
Reading fiction and reading minds: the role of simulation in the default network.阅读小说与读懂人心:模拟在默认网络中的作用
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2016 Feb;11(2):215-24. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsv114. Epub 2015 Sep 4.
5
Perceptual coupling and decoupling of the default mode network during mind-wandering and reading.在思维漫游和阅读过程中默认模式网络的知觉耦合和去耦合。
Elife. 2022 Mar 21;11:e74011. doi: 10.7554/eLife.74011.
6
Processing Speech and Thoughts during Silent Reading: Direct Reference Effects for Speech by Fictional Characters in Voice-Selective Auditory Cortex and a Theory-of-Mind Network.默读时对言语和思维的加工:语音选择性听觉皮层中对虚构人物言语的直接参照效应和心理理论网络。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2020 Sep;32(9):1637-1653. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01571. Epub 2020 May 7.
7
Flying to Neverland: How readers tacitly judge norms during comprehension.飞向梦幻岛:读者在阅读理解过程中如何隐性地评判规范。
Mem Cognit. 2014 Nov;42(8):1250-9. doi: 10.3758/s13421-014-0436-8.
8
Meeting George Bush versus meeting Cinderella: the neural response when telling apart what is real from what is fictional in the context of our reality.与乔治·布什见面与与灰姑娘见面:在我们的现实背景下区分真实与虚构时的神经反应。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2008 Jun;20(6):965-76. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2008.20059.
9
Spatial text processing: are estimates of time and distance influenced by the age of characters and readers?空间文本处理:人物和读者的年龄会影响时间和距离的估计吗?
Psychol Res. 2021 Feb;85(1):259-267. doi: 10.1007/s00426-019-01248-5. Epub 2019 Sep 23.
10
Distinguishing different fictional worlds during sentence comprehension: ERP evidence.句子理解过程中区分不同虚构世界:事件相关电位证据
Psychophysiology. 2014 Jan;51(1):42-51. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12149. Epub 2013 Oct 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Becoming the King in the North: identification with fictional characters is associated with greater self-other neural overlap.成为北方之王:对虚构角色的认同与更大的自我-他人神经重叠有关。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2021 May 21;16(6):541-551. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsab021.
2
NIRS-KIT: a MATLAB toolbox for both resting-state and task fNIRS data analysis.NIRS-KIT:一个用于静息态和任务态功能近红外光谱数据分析的MATLAB工具箱。
Neurophotonics. 2021 Jan;8(1):010802. doi: 10.1117/1.NPh.8.1.010802. Epub 2021 Jan 25.
3
Unique deficit in embodied simulation in autism: An fMRI study comparing autism and developmental coordination disorder.
孤独症患者具身模拟的独特缺陷:一项比较孤独症和发育性协调障碍的 fMRI 研究。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2021 Apr 1;42(5):1532-1546. doi: 10.1002/hbm.25312. Epub 2020 Dec 15.
4
Fiction reading has a small positive impact on social cognition: A meta-analysis.虚构阅读对社会认知有较小的积极影响:一项元分析。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2018 Nov;147(11):1713-1727. doi: 10.1037/xge0000395. Epub 2018 Feb 26.
5
Action simulation and mirroring in children with autism spectrum disorders.自闭症谱系障碍儿童的动作模拟与镜像
Behav Brain Res. 2018 Apr 2;341:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2017.12.012. Epub 2017 Dec 13.
6
Does a single session of reading literary fiction prime enhanced mentalising performance? Four replication experiments of Kidd and Castano (2013).单次阅读文学小说能否提升心理理论能力?基德和卡斯塔诺(2013年)的四项重复实验。
Cogn Emot. 2018 Feb;32(1):130-144. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2017.1279591. Epub 2017 Jan 17.
7
Does reading a single passage of literary fiction really improve theory of mind? An attempt at replication.阅读一段文学小说真的能提高心理理论吗?一项复制尝试。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2016 Nov;111(5):e46-e54. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000064. Epub 2016 Sep 19.
8
Fiction: Simulation of Social Worlds.虚构作品:社会世界的模拟
Trends Cogn Sci. 2016 Aug;20(8):618-628. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2016.06.002. Epub 2016 Jul 19.
9
Using Fiberless, Wearable fNIRS to Monitor Brain Activity in Real-world Cognitive Tasks.使用无纤维、可穿戴式功能近红外光谱技术监测现实世界认知任务中的大脑活动。
J Vis Exp. 2015 Dec 2(106):53336. doi: 10.3791/53336.
10
Reading fiction and reading minds: the role of simulation in the default network.阅读小说与读懂人心:模拟在默认网络中的作用
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2016 Feb;11(2):215-24. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsv114. Epub 2015 Sep 4.