Suppr超能文献

为什么透析液钠浓度的选择仍存在争议?

Why does the choice of dialysate sodium concentration remain controversial?

作者信息

Tangvoraphonkchai Kamonwan, Davenport Andrew

机构信息

Department of Renal Medicine, Mahasarakham University Hospital, Mahasarakham, Thailand.

UCL Centre for Nephrology, Royal Free Hospital, University College London, London, UK.

出版信息

Hemodial Int. 2018 Oct;22(4):435-444. doi: 10.1111/hdi.12645. Epub 2018 Feb 26.

Abstract

The choice of the ideal dialysate sodium concentration remains controversial. Most dialysis centers have a standard dialysate concentration. In theory, choosing a dialysate sodium concentration lower than serum sodium should result in an additional loss of sodium by diffusion with a reduction in the prevalence of hypertension and interdialytic weight gains (IDWGs) on one hand, but with potential increased risk of intradialytic hypotension and cramps on the other hand, and the opposite effects may accompany the choice of dialysate sodium concentrations greater than serum concentration. Although most studies have reported a reduction in IDWG with lower dialysate sodium concentrations, the effects on blood pressure control, and adverse intradialytic events have been variable. Different outcomes between studies may be partially explained by patient selection, with differences in dietary sodium intake, urinary sodium losses, and sodium stores in the body. In addition, multicenter trials potentially introduce additional confounders, including differences in local quality control of delivered dialysate sodium concentration and sodium measurements. Although there may be advantages for lower dialysate sodium concentration, observational studies have reported a survival advantage for higher dialysate sodium concentrations for those patients with lower serum sodium concentrations pre-dialysis. As there is no current consensus for a universal dialysate sodium concentration, attention has turned to considering an individualized approach to choosing a dialysate sodium concentration.

摘要

理想透析液钠浓度的选择仍存在争议。大多数透析中心都有标准的透析液浓度。理论上,选择低于血清钠浓度的透析液钠浓度,一方面应通过扩散导致额外的钠流失,从而降低高血压患病率和透析间期体重增加(IDWG),但另一方面可能会增加透析中低血压和痉挛的风险;而选择高于血清浓度的透析液钠浓度可能会产生相反的效果。尽管大多数研究报告称,较低的透析液钠浓度可降低IDWG,但对血压控制和透析中的不良事件的影响却各不相同。不同研究结果的差异可能部分归因于患者选择,包括饮食钠摄入量、尿钠流失和体内钠储备的差异。此外,多中心试验可能会引入额外的混杂因素,包括所输送透析液钠浓度和钠测量的局部质量控制差异。虽然较低的透析液钠浓度可能有优势,但观察性研究报告称,对于透析前血清钠浓度较低的患者,较高的透析液钠浓度具有生存优势。由于目前尚无关于通用透析液钠浓度的共识,人们已将注意力转向考虑采用个性化方法来选择透析液钠浓度。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验