UCL Department of Renal Medicine, Royal Free Hospital London, Pond Street, London, NW3 2QG, UK.
Centre for Sustainable Healthcare, 8 King Edward Street, Oxford, OX1 4HL, UK.
J Nephrol. 2024 Sep;37(7):1949-1955. doi: 10.1007/s40620-024-02073-9. Epub 2024 Sep 18.
Haemodialysis treatments generate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions mainly as a result of the equipment, consumables and pharmaceuticals required. An internal audit demonstrated a 33% wastage of acid concentrate when using individual 5.0 L containers at a 1:44 dilution ratio. We therefore investigated whether changing the delivery system for acid concentrate would reduce wastage and any associated greenhouse gas emissions.
We calculated the difference for a 30-bed dialysis unit between receiving acid concentrate in single-use 5.0 L plastic containers versus bulk delivery for a central acid delivery system connected to the dialysis machines. Estimates of carbon dioxide equivalent (COe) emissions were made using the United Kingdom government database and other sources.
A 30-station dialysis unit functioning at maximum capacity (3 shifts and 6 days/week), switching to bulk delivery and central acid delivery could realise an approximate total reduction of 33,841 kgCOe/year; in reduced product wastage, saving 6192 kgCOe, 5205 kgCOe from fewer deliveries, and 22,444 kgCOe saving from a reduction in packaging and waste generated, which equates approximately to a one tonne reduction in COe emissions per dialysis station/year.
Switching from delivering acid concentrate in individual 5.0 L containers to a central acid delivery system can result in substantial reductions in COe emissions within a dialysis clinic. The emission savings from reducing the single-use plastic packaging greatly outweigh any gains from eliminating wastage of acid concentrate. Dialysis companies and clinicians should consider reviewing the design of current and future dialysis facilities and policies to determine whether reductions in COe emissions can be made.
血液透析治疗会产生温室气体(GHG)排放,主要是由于设备、消耗品和药品的使用。内部审计显示,在稀释比例为 1:44 时,使用单个 5.0 升容器会导致酸浓缩物浪费 33%。因此,我们研究了改变酸浓缩物的输送系统是否会减少浪费和任何相关的温室气体排放。
我们计算了一个拥有 30 张床位的透析单元,在使用一次性 5.0 升塑料容器接收酸浓缩物与使用连接到透析机的中央酸输送系统进行批量输送之间的差异。使用英国政府数据库和其他来源估算了二氧化碳当量(COe)排放量。
一个满负荷运行的 30 个透析单元(三班倒,每周工作 6 天),切换到批量输送和中央酸输送,可以实现大约 33841 千克二氧化碳当量/年的总减排量;在减少产品浪费方面,可节省 6192 千克二氧化碳当量,减少 5205 千克二氧化碳当量的交付次数,减少 22444 千克二氧化碳当量的包装和废物产生,相当于每个透析站/年减少约一吨二氧化碳当量排放。
从使用一次性 5.0 升容器输送酸浓缩物切换到中央酸输送系统,可以在透析诊所内实现温室气体排放的大幅减少。减少一次性塑料包装的排放节约大大超过了从减少酸浓缩物浪费中获得的收益。透析公司和临床医生应考虑审查当前和未来透析设施和政策的设计,以确定是否可以减少二氧化碳当量排放。