• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Establishing the aims, format and function for multidisciplinary team-driven care within an inflammatory bowel disease service: a multicentre qualitative specialist-based consensus study.确定炎症性肠病服务中多学科团队驱动护理的目标、形式和功能:一项基于多中心定性专家的共识研究。
Frontline Gastroenterol. 2018 Jan;9(1):29-36. doi: 10.1136/flgastro-2017-100835. Epub 2017 Aug 10.
2
Defining the optimal design of the inflammatory bowel disease multidisciplinary team: results from a multicentre qualitative expert-based study.确定炎症性肠病多学科团队的最佳设计:一项基于专家的多中心定性研究结果
Frontline Gastroenterol. 2015 Oct;6(4):290-297. doi: 10.1136/flgastro-2014-100549. Epub 2015 Mar 26.
3
Establishing Key Performance Indicators [KPIs] and Their Importance for the Surgical Management of Inflammatory Bowel Disease-Results From a Pan-European, Delphi Consensus Study.建立关键绩效指标(KPI)及其对炎症性肠病手术管理的重要性:来自泛欧德尔菲共识研究的结果。
J Crohns Colitis. 2017 Oct 27;11(11):1362-1368. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjx099.
4
Patients Undergoing Ileoanal Pouch Surgery Experience a Constellation of Symptoms and Consequences Representing a Unique Syndrome: A Report from the Patient-Reported Outcomes After Pouch Surgery (PROPS) Delphi Consensus Study.接受回肠贮袋肛管吻合术的患者会经历一系列症状和后果,代表一种独特的综合征:来自贮袋手术后患者报告结局(PROPS)德尔菲共识研究的报告。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2021 Jul 1;64(7):861-870. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000002099.
5
Consensus standards of healthcare for adults and children with inflammatory bowel disease in the UK.英国成人及儿童炎症性肠病的医疗保健共识标准。
Frontline Gastroenterol. 2019 Jul 24;11(3):178-187. doi: 10.1136/flgastro-2019-101260. eCollection 2020.
6
Delphi consensus statement: Quality Indicators for Inflammatory Bowel Disease Comprehensive Care Units.德尔菲共识声明:炎症性肠病综合护理单元的质量指标。
J Crohns Colitis. 2014 Mar;8(3):240-51. doi: 10.1016/j.crohns.2013.10.010. Epub 2013 Dec 2.
7
A step-wise approach for establishing a multidisciplinary team for the management of tuberous sclerosis complex: a Delphi consensus report.建立结节性硬化症多学科管理团队的逐步方法:德尔菲共识报告。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2019 Apr 30;14(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s13023-019-1072-y.
8
Multidisciplinary management of patients with coexisting inflammatory bowel disease and spondyloarthritis: A Delphi consensus among Italian experts.炎症性肠病和脊柱关节炎共存患者的多学科管理:意大利专家的德尔菲共识。
Dig Liver Dis. 2017 Dec;49(12):1298-1305. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2017.06.004. Epub 2017 Jun 23.
9
ECCO-ESGAR Topical Review on Optimizing Reporting for Cross-Sectional Imaging in Inflammatory Bowel Disease.ECCO-ESGAR 专题综述:优化炎症性肠病的横断面成像报告
J Crohns Colitis. 2022 May 10;16(4):523-543. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjab180.
10
Educational Value of Surgical Multidisciplinary Team Meetings for Learning Non-Technical Skills - A Pilot Survey of Trainees From Two UK Deaneries.外科多学科团队会议对于学习非技术技能的教育价值——来自两个英国教务长区学员的试点调查。
J Surg Educ. 2019 Jul-Aug;76(4):1034-1047. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2019.02.001. Epub 2019 Feb 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Asia Pacific association of gastroenterology consensus statements on histopathological evaluation of inflammatory bowel diseases.亚太胃肠病学协会关于炎症性肠病组织病理学评估的共识声明
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2025 Aug 19;18:17562848251363703. doi: 10.1177/17562848251363703. eCollection 2025.
2
Role of the Dietitian in the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Multidisciplinary Team.营养师在炎症性肠病多学科团队中的作用。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2025 Sep;40(9):2190-2196. doi: 10.1111/jgh.70001. Epub 2025 Jul 10.
3
Endometriosis MDC: role of the radiologist.子宫内膜异位症多学科诊疗模式:放射科医生的作用
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2025 Apr 4. doi: 10.1007/s00261-025-04920-0.
4
Not just a BLiP: early experience with a novel multidisciplinary case conference for benign hepatopancreatobiliary disease at a tertiary Canadian healthcare center.不仅仅是一次短暂波动:加拿大一家三级医疗中心针对良性肝胆胰疾病开展新型多学科病例讨论会的早期经验
Surg Endosc. 2024 Dec;38(12):7459-7465. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11196-w. Epub 2024 Sep 3.
5
The 2023 Impact of Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Canada: Access to and Models of Care.2023年加拿大炎症性肠病的影响:医疗服务的可及性与模式
J Can Assoc Gastroenterol. 2023 Sep 5;6(Suppl 2):S111-S121. doi: 10.1093/jcag/gwad007. eCollection 2023 Sep.
6
Defining the Roles of Inflammatory Bowel Disease Clinical Pharmacists in the United States: A Systematic Review and National RAND/UCLA Consensus.定义美国炎症性肠病临床药师的角色:系统评价和国家 RAND/UCLA 共识。
Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2024 Jun 3;30(6):950-959. doi: 10.1093/ibd/izad143.
7
A Systematic Review of Self-Management Interventions for Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease.炎症性肠病患者自我管理干预措施的系统评价
Inflamm Intest Dis. 2023 Mar 27;8(1):1-12. doi: 10.1159/000530021. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
8
Consensus for criteria of running a pediatric inflammatory bowel disease center using a modified Delphi approach.采用改良 Delphi 法制定儿童炎症性肠病中心运行标准的共识。
World J Pediatr. 2023 Oct;19(10):939-948. doi: 10.1007/s12519-023-00691-0. Epub 2023 Apr 6.
9
Surgical Planning in Penetrating Abdominal Crohn's Disease.穿透性腹部克罗恩病的手术规划
Front Surg. 2022 May 3;9:867830. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.867830. eCollection 2022.
10
Core indicators of an evaluation and guidance system for quality of care in inflammatory bowel disease centers: A critical review.炎症性肠病中心医疗质量评估与指导系统的核心指标:一项批判性综述。
EClinicalMedicine. 2022 Apr 7;46:101382. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101382. eCollection 2022 Apr.

本文引用的文献

1
Defining the optimal design of the inflammatory bowel disease multidisciplinary team: results from a multicentre qualitative expert-based study.确定炎症性肠病多学科团队的最佳设计:一项基于专家的多中心定性研究结果
Frontline Gastroenterol. 2015 Oct;6(4):290-297. doi: 10.1136/flgastro-2014-100549. Epub 2015 Mar 26.
2
Research priorities for multi-institutional collaborative research in surgical education.外科教育中多机构合作研究的优先事项。
Am J Surg. 2015 Jan;209(1):52-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2014.08.032. Epub 2014 Oct 22.
3
"No decision about me without me" in the context of cancer multidisciplinary team meetings: a qualitative interview study.癌症多学科团队会议背景下的“没有我参与就没有关于我的决定”:一项定性访谈研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Oct 24;14:488. doi: 10.1186/s12913-014-0488-2.
4
Urologic oncology: expanding the evidence for multidisciplinary team cancer care.泌尿外科肿瘤学:拓展多学科团队癌症护理的证据
Nat Rev Urol. 2014 Dec;11(12):668-9. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2014.280. Epub 2014 Oct 14.
5
Strategies to improve the efficiency and utility of multidisciplinary team meetings in urology cancer care: a survey study.提高泌尿外科癌症护理多学科团队会议效率和效用的策略:一项调查研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Sep 8;14:377. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-377.
6
Improving quality of care in inflammatory bowel disease: what changes can be made today?改善炎症性肠病的医疗质量:当下可以做出哪些改变?
J Crohns Colitis. 2014 Sep;8(9):919-26. doi: 10.1016/j.crohns.2014.02.022. Epub 2014 Apr 6.
7
Improving decision making in multidisciplinary tumor boards: prospective longitudinal evaluation of a multicomponent intervention for 1,421 patients.提高多学科肿瘤委员会的决策制定能力:对 1421 例患者进行多组分干预的前瞻性纵向评估。
J Am Coll Surg. 2013 Sep;217(3):412-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.04.035. Epub 2013 Jul 25.
8
Multidisciplinary decisions in breast cancer: does the patient receive what the team has recommended?乳腺癌的多学科决策:患者是否接受了团队的建议?
Br J Cancer. 2013 Jun 25;108(12):2442-7. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2013.267. Epub 2013 Jun 4.
9
Does in-house availability of multidisciplinary teams increase survival in upper gastrointestinal-cancer?多学科团队的内部可用性是否会提高上消化道癌的生存率?
World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2013 Mar 15;5(3):60-7. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v5.i3.60.
10
Training faculty in nontechnical skill assessment: national guidelines on program requirements.培训教师进行非技术技能评估:项目要求的国家指南。
Ann Surg. 2013 Aug;258(2):370-5. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318279560b.

确定炎症性肠病服务中多学科团队驱动护理的目标、形式和功能:一项基于多中心定性专家的共识研究。

Establishing the aims, format and function for multidisciplinary team-driven care within an inflammatory bowel disease service: a multicentre qualitative specialist-based consensus study.

作者信息

Morar Pritesh S, Sevdalis Nick, Warusavitarne Janindra, Hart Ailsa, Green James, Edwards Cathryn, Faiz Omar

机构信息

Surgical Epidemiology Trials and Outcomes Centre, St Marks Hospital, Harrow, UK.

Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, London, UK.

出版信息

Frontline Gastroenterol. 2018 Jan;9(1):29-36. doi: 10.1136/flgastro-2017-100835. Epub 2017 Aug 10.

DOI:10.1136/flgastro-2017-100835
PMID:29484158
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5824767/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To obtain a specialist-based consensus on the aims, format and function for MDT-driven care within an inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) service.

DESIGN

This was a prospective, multicentre study using a Delphi formal consensus-building methodology.

SETTING

Participants were recruited nationally across 13 centres from July to August 2014.

PARTICIPANTS

24 participants were included into the Delphi Specialist Consensus Panel. They included six consultant colorectal surgeons, six gastroenterologists, five consultant radiologists, three consultant histopathologists and 4 IBD nurse specialists.

INTERVENTIONS

Panellists ranked items on a Likert scale (1=not important to 5=very important). Items with a median score >3 were considered eligible for inclusion.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Consensus was defined with an IQR ≤1. Consensus on categorical responses was defined by an agreement of >60%.

RESULTS

A consensus on items (median; IQR) that described the aims of the MDT-driven care that were considered included: (5;5-5), (5;5-5), (5;5-5), (5;5-5), (5;5-5) and (5;4-5). A consensus for being a core MDT member was demonstrated for colorectal surgeons (24/24), radiologists (24/24), gastroenterologists (24/24), nurse specialists (24/24), dieticians (14/23), histopathologists (21/23) and coordinators (21/24).

CONCLUSIONS

This study has provided a consensus for proposed aims, overall design, format and function MDT-driven care within an IBD service. This can provide a focus for core members, and aid a contractual recognition to ensure attendance and proactive contribution.

摘要

目的

就炎症性肠病(IBD)服务中多学科团队(MDT)驱动的护理的目标、形式和功能达成基于专家的共识。

设计

这是一项采用德尔菲正式共识构建方法的前瞻性多中心研究。

背景

2014年7月至8月在全国13个中心招募了参与者。

参与者

24名参与者被纳入德尔菲专家共识小组。其中包括6名结直肠外科顾问医师、6名胃肠病学家、5名放射科顾问医师、3名组织病理学家顾问和4名IBD专科护士。

干预措施

小组成员按照李克特量表(1 = 不重要至5 = 非常重要)对各项进行排序。中位数得分>3的项目被认为符合纳入条件。

主要观察指标

共识定义为四分位间距(IQR)≤1。分类回答的共识定义为达成一致的比例>60%。

结果

就描述MDT驱动护理目标的项目(中位数;IQR)达成的共识包括:(5;5 - 5)、(5;5 - 5)、(5;5 - 5)、(5;5 - 5)、(5;5 - 5)和(5;4 - 5)。结直肠外科医生(24/24)、放射科医生(24/24)、胃肠病学家(24/24)、护士专家(24/24)、营养师(14/23)、组织病理学家(21/23)和协调员(21/24)被证明是MDT的核心成员。

结论

本研究为IBD服务中MDT驱动护理的拟议目标、总体设计、形式和功能提供了共识。这可为核心成员提供重点,并有助于通过合同认可来确保出勤和积极贡献。