Suppr超能文献

使用螺旋扫描质子治疗改善 III 期非小细胞肺癌的剂量学结果。

Improve dosimetric outcome in stage III non-small-cell lung cancer treatment using spot-scanning proton arc (SPArc) therapy.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health System, Royal Oak, MI, USA.

出版信息

Radiat Oncol. 2018 Feb 27;13(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s13014-018-0981-6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

To evaluate spot-scanning proton arc therapy (SPArc) and multi-field robust optimized intensity modulated proton therapy (RO-IMPT) in treating stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.

METHODS

Two groups of stage IIIA or IIIB NSCLC patients (group 1: eight patients with tumor motion less than 5 mm; group 2: six patients with tumor motion equal to or more than 5 mm) were re-planned with SPArc and RO-IMPT. Both plans were generated using robust optimization to achieve an optimal coverage with 99% of internal target volume (ITV) receiving 66 Gy (RBE) in 33 fractions. The dosimetric results and plan robustness were compared for both groups. The interplay effect was evaluated based on the ITV coverage by single-fraction 4D dynamic dose. Total delivery time was simulated based on a full gantry rotation with energy-layer-switching-time (ELST) from 0.2 to 4 s. Statistical analysis was also evaluated via Wilcoxon signed rank test.

RESULTS

Both SPArc and RO-IMPT plans achieved similar robust target volume coverage for all patients, while SPArc significantly reduced the doses to critical structures as well as the interplay effect. Specifically, compared to RO-IMPT, SPArc reduced the average integral dose by 7.4% (p = 0.001), V, and mean lung dose by an average of 3.2% (p = 0.001) and 1.6 Gy (RBE) (p = 0.001), the max dose to cord by 4.6 Gy (RBE) (p = 0.04), and the mean dose to heart and esophagus by 0.7 Gy (RBE) (p = 0.01) and 1.7 Gy (RBE) (p = 0.003) respectively. The average total estimated delivery time was 160.1 s, 213.8 s, 303.4 s, 840.8 s based on ELST of 0.2 s, 0.5 s, 1 s, and 4 s for SPArc plans, compared with the respective values of 182.0 s (p = 0.001), 207.9 s (p = 0.22), 250.9 s (p = 0.001), 509.4 s (p = 0.001) for RO-IMPT plans. Hence, SPArc plans could be clinically feasible when using a shorter ELST.

CONCLUSIONS

This study has indicated that SPArc could further improve the dosimetric results in patients with locally advanced stage NSCLC and potentially be implemented into routine clinical practice.

摘要

背景

评估点扫描质子弧形治疗(SPArc)和多野稳健优化强度调制质子治疗(RO-IMPT)在治疗 III 期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者中的效果。

方法

将两组 IIIA 或 IIIB NSCLC 患者(组 1:肿瘤运动小于 5mm 的 8 例患者;组 2:肿瘤运动等于或大于 5mm 的 6 例患者)重新进行 SPArc 和 RO-IMPT 计划。这两种方案均使用稳健优化生成,以达到最佳覆盖,使 99%的内部靶区(ITV)在 33 个分次中接受 66Gy(RBE)。比较两组的剂量学结果和计划稳健性。根据 ITV 单次分割 4D 动态剂量的覆盖情况评估相互作用效应。根据能量层切换时间(ELST)从 0.2 到 4s 的全旋转架旋转,模拟总传输时间。还通过 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验进行了统计学分析。

结果

SPArc 和 RO-IMPT 方案均能为所有患者提供相似的稳健靶区覆盖,同时 SPArc 显著降低了危及器官的剂量和相互作用效应。具体来说,与 RO-IMPT 相比,SPArc 降低了平均积分剂量 7.4%(p=0.001)、V 和平均肺剂量分别降低了 3.2%(p=0.001)和 1.6Gy(RBE)(p=0.001)、脊髓最大剂量降低了 4.6Gy(RBE)(p=0.04)、心脏和食管的平均剂量分别降低了 0.7Gy(RBE)(p=0.01)和 1.7Gy(RBE)(p=0.003)。基于 ELST 为 0.2s、0.5s、1s 和 4s 的 SPArc 计划的平均总估计传输时间分别为 160.1s、213.8s、303.4s 和 840.8s,而 RO-IMPT 计划的相应值分别为 182.0s(p=0.001)、207.9s(p=0.22)、250.9s(p=0.001)和 509.4s(p=0.001)。因此,当使用更短的 ELST 时,SPArc 计划在临床上可能是可行的。

结论

本研究表明,SPArc 可以进一步改善局部晚期 III 期非小细胞肺癌患者的剂量学结果,并可能在临床实践中得到应用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验