Ayub Irfan Ismail, Arshad Abdul Majeed, Sekar Prathipa, Manimaran Natraj, Thangaswamy Dhanasekar, Chockalingam Chandrasekar
Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Sri Ramachandra Medical College and Research Institute, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Lung India. 2018 Mar-Apr;35(2):137-142. doi: 10.4103/lungindia.lungindia_198_17.
There is dearth of literature on asthma-chronic obstructive pulmonary disease overlap syndrome (ACOS) in India. The aim was to compare clinical characteristics between patients with ACOS and non-ACOS COPD and to identify clinical predictors of ACOS in patients with COPD.
We conducted a retrospective study by reviewing data collected from patients performing spirometry at our hospital. Those with postbronchodilator FEV/FVC <70% were included in the study. Among them, those with significant reversibility (change in FEVor FVC by 12% and 200 ml postbronchodilator) were diagnosed with ACOS and the rest were considered to have non-ACOS COPD. Data on the 2 groups were compared and statistical analysis was performed.
Out of a total of 324 patients, 100 of them had postbronchodilator FEV/FVC <70%. Of them, 45 and 55 were diagnosed with ACOS and non-ACOS COPD, respectively. Patients with ACOS had significantly higher postbronchodilator FVC volumes and FVC % predicted values (P < 0.05), had higher reported wheeze (P = 0.02) and ankle edema (P < 0.05), were more likely to be smokers (P = 0.01) with lower smoking index (P = 0.03), and had frequent (≥2) ER visits (P = 0.04). However, very frequent (≥3 per year) hospital admissions (P < 0.01) with higher rates of invasive mechanical ventilation (P = 0.02), and pulmonary hypertension diagnosed by two-dimensional echocardiography (P < 0.01) were significantly higher in the non-ACOS group. The two groups did not differ with respect to history of atopy, family history of wheeze, compliance to inhaler therapy, or blood absolute eosinophil counts.
Our study highlights how the ACOS phenotype may clinically differ from their counterparts elsewhere, making it a clinical challenge to identify them in India.
印度关于哮喘-慢性阻塞性肺疾病重叠综合征(ACOS)的文献匮乏。目的是比较ACOS患者与非ACOS慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者的临床特征,并确定COPD患者中ACOS的临床预测因素。
我们通过回顾在我院进行肺功能检查的患者收集的数据进行了一项回顾性研究。支气管扩张剂后FEV/FVC<70%的患者纳入研究。其中,具有显著可逆性(支气管扩张剂后FEV或FVC变化12%且变化量达200ml)的患者被诊断为ACOS,其余患者被认为患有非ACOS COPD。比较两组数据并进行统计分析。
在总共324例患者中,100例支气管扩张剂后FEV/FVC<70%。其中,45例和55例分别被诊断为ACOS和非ACOS COPD。ACOS患者支气管扩张剂后FVC容积和FVC预测值百分比显著更高(P<0.05),报告的喘息(P=0.02)和踝部水肿(P<0.05)发生率更高,更可能是吸烟者(P=0.01)且吸烟指数更低(P=0.03),并且急诊就诊频繁(≥2次)(P=0.04)。然而,非ACOS组每年住院次数非常频繁(≥3次)(P<0.01)、有创机械通气率更高(P=0.02)以及二维超声心动图诊断的肺动脉高压(P<0.01)显著更高。两组在特应性病史、喘息家族史、吸入器治疗依从性或血液嗜酸性粒细胞绝对计数方面无差异。
我们的研究强调了ACOS表型在临床上可能与其他地方的表型有所不同,这使得在印度识别它们成为一项临床挑战。