Outten H Robert, Lee Timothy, Costa-Lopes Rui, Schmitt Michael T, Vala Jorge
Department of Psychology, Trinity College, Hartford, CT, United States.
Institute of Social Sciences, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.
Front Psychol. 2018 Feb 13;9:79. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00079. eCollection 2018.
Using concepts from social identity theory (Tajfel and Turner, 1979), we examined whether racial/ethnic majority group members' reactions to future demographic shifts is a function of the degree to which they perceive their ingroup's higher-status in society to be legitimate. In two studies, participants who varied in the degree to which they perceived their group's status to be legitimate were either exposed to real projections for 2060 (i.e., large decline in proportion of population that is the "majority" group), or fake projections for 2060-that resembled current figures (i.e., small decline). In Study 1, White Americans who perceived their status to be highly legitimate expressed greater intergroup threat, and negative feelings (anger and fear) toward minorities after exposure to projections with a large decline in the relative size of the White American population. In contrast, demographic shift condition had no effect on intergroup threat and negative feelings toward minorities among White Americans who perceived their status to be relatively illegitimate; negative feelings and threat remained low across both conditions. Similarly, in Study 2, ethnic Portuguese people in Portugal exposed to projections in which there was a large decline in the relative size of the ethnic Portuguese population experienced more intergroup threat and expressed a greater desire to engage in anti-immigration behaviors. The effect of demographic shift condition on intergroup threat and anti-immigration behaviors was stronger among ethnic Portuguese who perceived their status to be legitimate compared to ethnic Portuguese people who perceived their status to be relatively illegitimate. These results highlight that across different cultural contexts, majority group members' beliefs about the legitimacy of intergroup relations can affect their reactions to the prospect of increased diversity.
运用社会认同理论(塔菲尔和特纳,1979)中的概念,我们研究了种族/族裔多数群体成员对未来人口结构变化的反应是否取决于他们认为自己所属群体在社会中较高地位的合法性程度。在两项研究中,根据对自身群体地位合法性认知程度不同的参与者,要么接触到2060年的真实人口预测(即“多数”群体人口比例大幅下降),要么接触到类似当前数据的2060年虚假预测(即小幅下降)。在研究1中,认为自身地位高度合法的美国白人在接触到美国白人人口相对规模大幅下降的预测后,表现出更大的群体间威胁以及对少数族裔的负面情绪(愤怒和恐惧)。相比之下,人口结构变化状况对认为自身地位相对不合法的美国白人的群体间威胁和对少数族裔的负面情绪没有影响;在两种情况下,负面情绪和威胁都保持在较低水平。同样,在研究2中,葡萄牙的葡萄牙族裔在接触到葡萄牙族裔人口相对规模大幅下降的预测后,经历了更多的群体间威胁,并表现出更强烈的参与反移民行为的意愿。与认为自身地位相对不合法的葡萄牙族裔相比,认为自身地位合法的葡萄牙族裔中,人口结构变化状况对群体间威胁和反移民行为的影响更强。这些结果表明,在不同文化背景下,多数群体成员对群体间关系合法性的信念会影响他们对多样性增加前景的反应。