McGill University.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2018 Oct;30(10):1433-1441. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01253. Epub 2018 Feb 28.
When choosing between options that vary in risk, we often rely on our experience with options-our episodic memories-to make that choice. Although episodic memory has been demonstrated to be critically involved in value-based decision-making, it is not clear how these memory processes contribute to decision-making that involves risk. To investigate this issue, we tested a group of participants on a repeated-choice risky decision-making task. Before completing this task, half of the participants were given a well-validated episodic induction task-a brief training procedure in recollecting the details of a past experience-known to engage episodic memory processes, and the other half were given a general impressions induction task. Our main finding was that risk-taking following the general impressions induction task was significantly lower than following the episodic induction task. In a follow-up experiment, we tested risk-taking in another group of participants without any prior induction task and found that risk-taking from this no-induction (baseline) group was more similar to the episodic induction than to the general impression group. Overall, these findings suggest engaging episodic memory processes when learning about decision outcomes can alter apparent risk-taking behavior in decision-making from experience.
在风险不同的选项之间进行选择时,我们通常依赖于我们对选项的经验——即情景记忆——来做出选择。尽管情景记忆已被证明在基于价值的决策中起着关键作用,但尚不清楚这些记忆过程如何有助于涉及风险的决策。为了研究这个问题,我们对一组参与者进行了一项重复选择风险决策任务的测试。在完成这项任务之前,一半的参与者接受了一项经过充分验证的情景记忆诱导任务——回忆过去经历细节的简短训练程序,众所周知,该程序会引发情景记忆过程,而另一半参与者接受了一般性印象诱导任务。我们的主要发现是,在一般性印象诱导任务后进行的冒险行为明显低于在情景记忆诱导任务后进行的冒险行为。在后续实验中,我们在另一组没有任何预先诱导任务的参与者中测试了冒险行为,发现这个无诱导(基线)组的冒险行为与情景记忆诱导组更相似,而不是与一般性印象组更相似。总的来说,这些发现表明,在学习决策结果时,情景记忆过程的参与可以改变从经验中得出的明显的冒险行为。