Suppr超能文献

早期精神病干预的效果:基于人群健康行政数据的服务使用者与非使用者比较。

Effectiveness of Early Psychosis Intervention: Comparison of Service Users and Nonusers in Population-Based Health Administrative Data.

机构信息

From the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada; the Department of Psychiatry, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada; the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; and the Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Am J Psychiatry. 2018 May 1;175(5):443-452. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2017.17050480. Epub 2018 Mar 2.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Early psychosis intervention (EPI) programs improve clinical and functional outcomes for people with first-episode psychosis. Less is known about the impact of these programs on the larger health care system. The authors sought to compare indicators of health service use, self-harm, suicide, and mortality between people with first-episode psychosis who were using EPI services and a propensity-matched group of concurrent control subjects who were not accessing EPI services.

METHOD

A retrospective cohort of incident cases of nonaffective psychosis in the catchment area of the Prevention and Early Intervention Program for Psychoses in London, Ontario, between 1997 and 2013 was constructed using health administrative data. This cohort was linked to primary data from the same program to identify people who used EPI services. Outcomes for people who used EPI services and those who did not were compared using Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

People who used EPI services had substantially lower rates of all-cause mortality in the 2-year period after EPI program admission (hazard ratio=0.24, 95% CI=0.11-0.53), although a significant difference in self-harm (hazard ratio=0.86, 95% CI=0.18-4.24) and suicide (hazard ratio=0.73, 95% CI=0.29-1.80) between the two groups was not observed. Those who used EPI services also had lower rates of emergency department presentation (hazard ratio=0.71, 95% CI=0.60-0.83) but higher rates of hospitalization (hazard ratio=1.42, 95% CI=1.18-1.71). These benefits were not observed after 2 years, when EPI care is typically stepped down to medical management.

CONCLUSIONS

People with first-episode psychosis who used EPI services had mortality rates that were four times lower than those with first-episode psychosis who did not use these services, as well as better outcomes across several health care system indicators. These findings support the effectiveness of EPI services for the treatment of first-episode psychosis in the larger context of the overall health care system.

摘要

目的

早期精神病干预(EPI)计划改善了首发精神病患者的临床和功能结果。然而,对于这些计划对更大的医疗保健系统的影响知之甚少。作者旨在比较接受 EPI 服务的首发精神病患者和同时未接受 EPI 服务的倾向匹配对照组的患者在卫生服务使用、自残、自杀和死亡率方面的指标。

方法

通过使用健康管理数据,构建了安大略省伦敦预防和早期干预精神病计划的 1997 年至 2013 年期间非情感性精神病发病的病例回顾队列。该队列与来自同一计划的主要数据相关联,以确定使用 EPI 服务的人员。使用 Cox 比例风险模型比较使用 EPI 服务的患者和未使用 EPI 服务的患者的结果。

结果

在接受 EPI 计划入院后的 2 年内,使用 EPI 服务的患者的全因死亡率明显降低(风险比=0.24,95%CI=0.11-0.53),尽管两组之间在自残(风险比=0.86,95%CI=0.18-4.24)和自杀(风险比=0.73,95%CI=0.29-1.80)方面没有显著差异。使用 EPI 服务的患者也有较低的急诊就诊率(风险比=0.71,95%CI=0.60-0.83),但住院率较高(风险比=1.42,95%CI=1.18-1.71)。在 EPI 护理通常降至医疗管理后,这些益处在 2 年后并未观察到。

结论

使用 EPI 服务的首发精神病患者的死亡率比未使用这些服务的患者低四倍,并且在多个医疗保健系统指标方面有更好的结果。这些发现支持 EPI 服务在更大的整体医疗保健系统背景下治疗首发精神病的有效性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验