• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[针对因心力衰竭入院患者的多学科护理管理项目的疗效(ProMIC)]

[Efficacy of a multidisciplinary care management program for patients admitted at hospital because of heart failure (ProMIC)].

作者信息

Domingo Cristina, Aros Fernando, Otxandategi Agurtzane, Beistegui Idoia, Besga Ariadna, Latorre Pedro María

机构信息

Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria, Gerencia de Atención Primaria del Servicio Cántabro de Salud, Santander, España.

Hospital Universitario de Araba, Osakidetza, Araba, España; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red Fisiopatologia de la Obesidad y de la Nutrición (CIBEROBN), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, España.

出版信息

Aten Primaria. 2019 Mar;51(3):142-152. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2017.09.011. Epub 2018 Feb 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.aprim.2017.09.011
PMID:29496299
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6836999/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy of the ProMIC, multidisciplinary program for patients admitted at hospital because of heart failure (HF) programme, in reducing the HF-related readmission rate.

DESING

Quasi-experimental research with control group.

SETTINGS

Twelve primary health care centres and 3 hospitals from the Basque Country.

PARTICIPANTS

Aged 40 years old or above patients admitted for HF with a New York Heart Association functional class II to IV.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients in the intervention group carried out the ProMIC programme, a structured clinical intervention based on clinical guidelines and on the chronic care model. Control group received usual care.

MAIN MEASUREMENTS

The rate of readmission for HF and health-related quality of life RESULTS: One hundred fifty five patients were included in ProMIC group and 129 in control group. 45 rehospitalisation due to heart failure happened in ProMIC versus 75 in control group (adjusted hazard ratio=0.59, CI 95%: 0.36-0.98; P=.049). There were significant differences in specific quality of life al 6 months. No significant differences were found in rehospitalisation due to all causes, due to cardiovascular causes, visits to emergency room, mortality, the combined variable of these events, the functional capacity or quality of life at 12 months of follow up.

CONCLUSIONS

ProMIC reduces significantly heart failure rehospitalisation and improve quality of life al 6 months of follow up. No significant differences were found in the rests of variables.

摘要

目的

评估针对因心力衰竭(HF)入院患者的多学科ProMIC项目在降低HF相关再入院率方面的疗效。

设计

设有对照组的准实验研究。

地点

来自巴斯克地区的12个初级卫生保健中心和3家医院。

参与者

年龄在40岁及以上、因HF入院且纽约心脏协会心功能分级为II至IV级的患者。

干预措施

干预组患者实施ProMIC项目,这是一项基于临床指南和慢性病护理模式的结构化临床干预。对照组接受常规护理。

主要测量指标

HF再入院率和健康相关生活质量。

结果

ProMIC组纳入155例患者,对照组纳入129例患者。ProMIC组因心力衰竭再次住院45例,对照组为75例(调整后风险比=0.59,95%置信区间:0.36 - 0.98;P = 0.049)。6个月时特定生活质量存在显著差异。在随访12个月时,因各种原因、心血管原因导致的再入院、急诊室就诊次数、死亡率、这些事件的综合变量、功能能力或生活质量方面未发现显著差异。

结论

ProMIC显著降低心力衰竭再入院率,并在随访6个月时改善生活质量。在其余变量方面未发现显著差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df0b/6836999/153cf78c9157/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df0b/6836999/a6d751a2ce2c/fx1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df0b/6836999/d7679cf16dee/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df0b/6836999/153cf78c9157/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df0b/6836999/a6d751a2ce2c/fx1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df0b/6836999/d7679cf16dee/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df0b/6836999/153cf78c9157/gr2.jpg

相似文献

1
[Efficacy of a multidisciplinary care management program for patients admitted at hospital because of heart failure (ProMIC)].[针对因心力衰竭入院患者的多学科护理管理项目的疗效(ProMIC)]
Aten Primaria. 2019 Mar;51(3):142-152. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2017.09.011. Epub 2018 Feb 26.
2
Community-based care for the specialized management of heart failure: an evidence-based analysis.基于社区的心力衰竭专科管理:一项循证分析
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2009;9(17):1-42. Epub 2009 Nov 1.
3
Cost/utility ratio in chronic heart failure: comparison between heart failure management program delivered by day-hospital and usual care.慢性心力衰竭的成本/效用比:日间医院提供的心力衰竭管理项目与常规护理的比较。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002 Oct 2;40(7):1259-66. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(02)02140-x.
4
A new programme of multidisciplinary care for patients with heart failure in Poznań: one-year follow-up.波兹南一项针对心力衰竭患者的多学科护理新计划:一年随访
Kardiol Pol. 2006 Oct;64(10):1063-70; discussion 1071-2.
5
Efficacy of an integrated hospital-primary care program for heart failure: a population-based analysis of 56,742 patients.一项针对心力衰竭的综合医院-初级保健项目的疗效:对56742名患者的基于人群的分析。
Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2014 Apr;67(4):283-93. doi: 10.1016/j.rec.2013.12.005. Epub 2014 Feb 8.
6
Population-based evaluation of the impact of socioeconomic status on clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure in integrated care settings.基于人群的评估:在综合护理环境中,社会经济地位对心力衰竭患者临床结局的影响。
Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2023 Oct;76(10):803-812. doi: 10.1016/j.rec.2023.03.009. Epub 2023 Mar 22.
7
8
Effects of a 9-Week Hybrid Comprehensive Telerehabilitation Program on Long-term Outcomes in Patients With Heart Failure: The Telerehabilitation in Heart Failure Patients (TELEREH-HF) Randomized Clinical Trial.一项为期 9 周的综合远程康复计划对心力衰竭患者长期结局的影响:心力衰竭患者远程康复(TELEREH-HF)随机临床试验。
JAMA Cardiol. 2020 Mar 1;5(3):300-308. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.5006.
9
Disease management interventions for heart failure.心力衰竭的疾病管理干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jan 8;1(1):CD002752. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002752.pub4.
10
Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for adults with heart failure.针对成年心力衰竭患者的运动心脏康复治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jan 29;1(1):CD003331. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003331.pub5.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors associated with medication non-adherence among patients with heart failure.与心力衰竭患者药物治疗不依从相关的因素。
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2024 Aug 30;32:e4302. doi: 10.1590/1518-8345.6756.4302. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Early Postdischarge STOP-HF-Clinic Reduces 30-day Readmissions in Old and Frail Patients With Heart Failure.出院后早期心衰专科门诊可降低老年及体弱心力衰竭患者30天再入院率。
Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2017 Aug;70(8):631-638. doi: 10.1016/j.rec.2017.01.003. Epub 2017 Feb 16.
2
Transitions of Care Between Acute and Chronic Heart Failure: Critical Steps in the Design of a Multidisciplinary Care Model for the Prevention of Rehospitalization.急性与慢性心力衰竭之间的照护过渡:预防再住院的多学科照护模式设计中的关键步骤
Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2016 Oct;69(10):951-961. doi: 10.1016/j.rec.2016.05.001. Epub 2016 Jun 6.
3
The global burden of cardiovascular diseases, 1990-2010.
1990 - 2010年心血管疾病的全球负担
Glob Heart. 2014 Mar;9(1):183-4. doi: 10.1016/j.gheart.2014.01.008.
4
Preventing 30-day hospital readmissions: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.预防30天内再次入院:随机试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Jul;174(7):1095-107. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.1608.
5
Forecasting the impact of heart failure in the United States: a policy statement from the American Heart Association.预测心力衰竭对美国的影响:美国心脏协会的政策声明。
Circ Heart Fail. 2013 May;6(3):606-19. doi: 10.1161/HHF.0b013e318291329a. Epub 2013 Apr 24.
6
2011 update to National Heart Foundation of Australia and Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand Guidelines for the prevention, detection and management of chronic heart failure in Australia, 2006.2011 年澳大利亚国家心脏基金会和澳大利亚与新西兰心脏学会《2006 年澳大利亚慢性心力衰竭的预防、检测和管理指南》更新。
Med J Aust. 2011 Apr 18;194(8):405-9. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2011.tb03031.x.
7
Exercise training for systolic heart failure: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis.运动训练治疗收缩性心力衰竭:Cochrane 系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2010 Jul;12(7):706-15. doi: 10.1093/eurjhf/hfq056. Epub 2010 May 21.
8
Effectiveness of self-management interventions on mortality, hospital readmissions, chronic heart failure hospitalization rate and quality of life in patients with chronic heart failure: a systematic review.自我管理干预对慢性心力衰竭患者死亡率、再住院率、慢性心力衰竭住院率和生活质量的影响:系统评价。
Patient Educ Couns. 2010 Mar;78(3):297-315. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2010.01.016. Epub 2010 Mar 3.
9
What is the strength of evidence for heart failure disease-management programs?心力衰竭疾病管理项目的证据强度如何?
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Jul 28;54(5):397-401. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.04.051.
10
ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure 2008: the Task Force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure 2008 of the European Society of Cardiology. Developed in collaboration with the Heart Failure Association of the ESC (HFA) and endorsed by the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM).《2008年欧洲心脏病学会急性和慢性心力衰竭诊断与治疗指南》:欧洲心脏病学会2008年急性和慢性心力衰竭诊断与治疗特别工作组制定。与欧洲心脏病学会心力衰竭协会(HFA)合作编写,并得到欧洲重症监护医学学会(ESICM)认可。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2008 Oct;10(10):933-89. doi: 10.1016/j.ejheart.2008.08.005. Epub 2008 Sep 16.