Manyazewal Tsegahun, Matlakala Mokgadi C
Department of Health Studies, College of Human Sciences, University of South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa.
University of California San Diego, Anti-Viral Research Center, ADDIS VP Project, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
J Glob Health. 2018 Jun;8(1):010403. doi: 10.7189/jogh.08.010403.
Understanding the way health care reforms have succeeded or failed thus far would help policy makers cater continued reform efforts in the future and provides insight into possible levels of improvement in the health care system. This work aims to assess and describe the implications of health care reform on the performance of public hospitals in central Ethiopia.
A facility-based, cross-sectional study was carried out in five public hospitals with different operational characteristics that have been implementing health care reform in central Ethiopia. The reform documents were reviewed to assess the nature and targets of the reform for interpretive analysis. Adopting dimensions of health system performance as the theoretical framework, a self-administered questionnaire was developed. Consenting health care professionals who have been involved in the reform from inception to implementation filled the questionnaire. Cronbach's alpha was measured to ensure internal consistency of the instrument. Descriptive statistics, weighted median score, χ, and Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used for data analysis.
s Despite implementation of the reform, the health care system in public hospitals was still fragmented as confirmed by 50% of respondents. Limited effects were reported in favour of quality (48%), access (50%), efficiency (51%), sustainability (53%), and equity (61%) of care, while poor effects were reported in patient-provider (41%) and provider-management (32%) interactions. Though there was substantial gain in infrastructure and workspace, stewardship of health care resources was less benefited. The predominant hindrances of the reform were the working environment (adjusted Odds Ratio (aOR) = 2.27, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.15-4.47), financial resources (aOR = 3.54, 95%CI = 1.97-6.33), management (aOR = 2.27, 95% CI = 1.15-4.47), and information technology system (aOR = 3.15, 95% CI = 1.57-6.32).
s The Ethiopian health care reform has laid the groundwork for health system improvement, but progress was slow and the health care delivery system was still fragile. Healthcare reform efforts in such settings are feasible, but with regular mapping of programmatic outcomes and bringing a common understanding of the reform among stakeholders.
了解医疗改革到目前为止的成败方式,将有助于政策制定者为未来持续的改革努力提供方向,并深入了解医疗系统可能的改进水平。这项工作旨在评估和描述医疗改革对埃塞俄比亚中部公立医院绩效的影响。
在埃塞俄比亚中部五家具有不同运营特点且一直在实施医疗改革的公立医院中开展了一项基于机构的横断面研究。对改革文件进行审查,以评估改革的性质和目标,用于解释性分析。采用卫生系统绩效维度作为理论框架,编制了一份自填式问卷。从改革开始到实施阶段一直参与其中的同意参与调查的医护人员填写问卷。测量了克朗巴哈系数以确保问卷的内部一致性。使用描述性统计、加权中位数得分、χ检验、曼-惠特尼U检验和克鲁斯卡尔-沃利斯检验进行数据分析。
尽管实施了改革,但50%的受访者证实公立医院的医疗系统仍然分散。在医疗质量(48%)、可及性(50%)、效率(51%)、可持续性(53%)和公平性(61%)方面报告的效果有限,而在医患(41%)和医护-管理(32%)互动方面报告的效果较差。尽管在基础设施和工作空间方面有显著改善,但医疗资源的管理受益较少。改革的主要障碍是工作环境(调整后的优势比(aOR)=2.27,95%置信区间(CI):1.15 - 4.47)、财政资源(aOR = 3.54,95%CI = 1.97 - 6.33)、管理(aOR = 2.27,95%CI = 1.15 - 4.47)和信息技术系统(aOR = 3.15,95%CI = 1.57 - 6.32)。
埃塞俄比亚的医疗改革为卫生系统的改善奠定了基础,但进展缓慢,医疗服务提供系统仍然脆弱。在这种情况下,医疗改革努力是可行的,但需要定期规划项目成果,并使利益相关者对改革达成共识。