Agricultural Economics and Policy (AECP) Group, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Laboratoire LETG Rennes COSTEL (UMR CNRS 6554), Université Européenne de Bretagne-Rennes 2, Rennes, France.
Environ Manage. 2018 May;61(5):772-785. doi: 10.1007/s00267-018-1004-y. Epub 2018 Mar 1.
In tropical forests farmers are among the most important agents of deforestation. At the interface between societies and their environment, ecosystem services (ES) is an integrated working framework through which natural and anthropogenic dimensions can be addressed. Here, we aimed to understand to what extent farmers impact ES availability. Based on case studies in three locations in the Brazilian Amazon rainforest, we performed statistical analyses at 135 sampling points and 110 farms to link socioeconomic and ES data, both derived from field work. The socioeconomic data characterized agricultural production, sociological characteristics, and quality of life. ES data were obtained from statistical analyses that yielded a multiple ES indicator for each sampling point and farm. Our results produced three main findings: first, the establishment of ES associations is due more to agricultural production characteristics than to sociological and quality-of-life factors. Second, the impact of agricultural production on ES availability depends on the level of total incomes. An increase in incomes causes a decrease in the forest cover that provides many ES and an increase in other areas that provide fewer ES. Finally, our analyses show a very strong site effect that probably expresses the heterogeneity of the biophysical contexts, but also the importance for ES availability of the historical depth of deforestation and/or the role of specific public policies. Finding ways of producing an alternative impact on ES availability and establishing specific ES associations will therefore depend more on changes in the global political context than in individual practices.
在热带森林中,农民是森林砍伐的最重要的驱动因素之一。在社会及其环境的交汇处,生态系统服务(ES)是一个综合的工作框架,可以通过该框架解决自然和人为因素。在这里,我们旨在了解农民对生态系统服务可用性的影响程度。基于巴西亚马逊雨林三个地点的案例研究,我们在 135 个采样点和 110 个农场进行了统计分析,将社会经济和生态系统服务数据联系起来,这些数据均来自实地工作。社会经济数据描述了农业生产、社会学特征和生活质量。生态系统服务数据来自统计分析,为每个采样点和农场生成了多个生态系统服务指标。我们的研究结果得出了三个主要发现:首先,生态系统服务关联的建立更多地取决于农业生产特征,而不是社会学和生活质量因素。其次,农业生产对生态系统服务可用性的影响取决于总收入水平。收入的增加会导致提供许多生态系统服务的森林覆盖减少,而提供较少生态系统服务的其他区域增加。最后,我们的分析显示出非常强烈的地点效应,这可能表达了生物物理背景的异质性,以及森林砍伐的历史深度和/或特定公共政策在生态系统服务可用性方面的重要性。因此,找到产生对生态系统服务可用性的替代影响的方法,并建立特定的生态系统服务关联,将更多地取决于全球政治背景的变化,而不是个人实践。