Division of Violence Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Hwy. NE, MS F-63, Atlanta, GA 30341-3717.
Statistics, Programming, and Economics Branch, Division of Analysis, Research, and Practice Integration, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Highway NE, MS F-64, Atlanta, GA 30341-3717.
J Sch Health. 2018 Apr;88(4):296-305. doi: 10.1111/josh.12609.
This study used a new Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) assessment tool to test the associations between physical attributes of schools and violence-related behaviors and perceptions of students.
Data were collected from 4717 students from 50 middle schools. Student perceptions of risk and safety, and violence were assessed. Evaluators used the CPTED School Assessment (CSA) to quantify how well the physical elements of each school correspond to ideal CPTED principles. Generalized linear mixed models were used to adjust for school- and student-level characteristics.
Higher CSA scores were generally associated with higher perceptions of safety and lower levels of violence perpetration and perceived risk in unadjusted models. Higher CSA scores were also associated with lower odds of missing school because of safety concerns in most adjusted models, with significant adjusted odds ratios (AORs) ranging from 0.32 to 0.63. CSA scores for parking and bus loading areas also remained associated with higher perceived safety (AORs = 1.28 and 1.32, respectively) and lower perceived risk (AORs = 0.73 and 0.66, respectively) in adjusted models.
The CSA is useful for assessing school environments that are associated with violence-related behaviors and perceptions. The CSA might help guide school environmental modifications to reduce violence.
本研究使用一种新的犯罪预防环境设计(CPTED)评估工具,测试学校的物理属性与学生的暴力相关行为和观念之间的关联。
数据来自 50 所中学的 4717 名学生。评估了学生对风险和安全的感知,以及暴力行为。评估人员使用 CPTED 学校评估(CSA)来量化每所学校的物理元素与理想 CPTED 原则的吻合程度。广义线性混合模型用于调整学校和学生层面的特征。
在未调整的模型中,较高的 CSA 分数通常与较高的安全感知、较低的暴力行为发生率和较低的感知风险相关。在大多数调整后的模型中,较高的 CSA 分数也与因安全问题而缺课的几率较低有关,具有显著意义的调整后比值比(AOR)范围从 0.32 到 0.63。在调整后的模型中,停车场和公共汽车上下客区的 CSA 分数也与较高的感知安全性(AOR 分别为 1.28 和 1.32)和较低的感知风险(AOR 分别为 0.73 和 0.66)相关。
CSA 可用于评估与暴力相关行为和观念相关的学校环境。CSA 可能有助于指导学校环境的修改,以减少暴力行为。