School of Public Health, Department of Biostatistics, Robert C. Byrd Health Sciences Center, West Virginia University, PO Box 9190, Morgantown, WV, 26506-9190, USA.
BMC Cancer. 2018 Mar 2;18(1):246. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4163-6.
Systematic reviews, with or without meta-analysis, play an important role today in synthesizing cancer research and are frequently used to guide decision-making. However, there is now an increase in the number of systematic reviews on the same topic, thereby necessitating a systematic review of previous systematic reviews. With a focus on cancer, the purpose of this article is to provide a practical, stepwise approach for systematically reviewing the literature and publishing the results. This starts with the registration of a protocol for a systematic review of previous systematic reviews and ends with the publication of an original or updated systematic review, with or without meta-analysis, in a peer-reviewed journal. Future directions as well as potential limitations of the approach are also discussed. It is hoped that the stepwise approach presented in this article will be helpful to both producers and consumers of cancer-related systematic reviews and will contribute to the ultimate goal of preventing and treating cancer.
系统评价,无论是否进行荟萃分析,在今天的癌症研究综合中都起着重要作用,经常被用来指导决策。然而,现在关于同一主题的系统评价数量有所增加,因此需要对以前的系统评价进行系统回顾。本文以癌症为重点,旨在提供一种实用的、逐步的方法,用于系统地审查文献并公布结果。这从注册一个以前的系统评价的系统评价方案开始,最后以同行评议的期刊上发表原始或更新的系统评价结束,无论是否进行荟萃分析。还讨论了该方法的未来方向和潜在局限性。希望本文提出的逐步方法能对癌症相关系统评价的生产者和使用者都有所帮助,并有助于实现预防和治疗癌症的最终目标。