Suppr超能文献

合同研究 - 儿童阑尾炎的保守治疗(可行性):一项随机对照试验的研究方案

CONTRACT Study - CONservative TReatment of Appendicitis in Children (feasibility): study protocol for a randomised controlled Trial.

作者信息

Hutchings Natalie, Wood Wendy, Reading Isabel, Walker Erin, Blazeby Jane M, Van't Hoff William, Young Bridget, Crawley Esther M, Eaton Simon, Chorozoglou Maria, Sherratt Frances C, Beasant Lucy, Corbett Harriet, Stanton Michael P, Grist Simon, Dixon Elizabeth, Hall Nigel J

机构信息

Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.

National Institute of Health Research (NIHR), Research Design Service South Central, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.

出版信息

Trials. 2018 Mar 2;19(1):153. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2520-z.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Currently, the routine treatment for acute appendicitis in the United Kingdom is an appendicectomy. However, there is increasing scientific interest and research into non-operative treatment of appendicitis in adults and children. While a number of studies have investigated non-operative treatment of appendicitis in adults, this research cannot be applied to the paediatric population. Ultimately, we aim to perform a UK-based multicentre randomised controlled trial (RCT) to test the clinical and cost effectiveness of non-operative treatment of acute uncomplicated appendicitis in children, as compared with appendicectomy. First, we will undertake a feasibility study to assess the feasibility of performing such a trial.

METHODS/DESIGN: The study involves a feasibility RCT with a nested qualitative research to optimise recruitment as well as a health economic substudy. Children (aged 4-15 years inclusive) diagnosed with acute uncomplicated appendicitis that would normally be treated with an appendicectomy are eligible for the RCT. Exclusion criteria include clinical/radiological suspicion of perforated appendicitis, appendix mass or previous non-operative treatment of appendicitis. Participants will be randomised into one of two arms. Participants in the intervention arm are treated with antibiotics and regular clinical assessment to ensure clinical improvement. Participants in the control arm will receive appendicectomy. Randomisation will be minimised by age, sex, duration of symptoms and centre. Children and families who are approached for the RCT will be invited to participate in the embedded qualitative substudy, which includes recording of recruitment consultants and subsequent interviews with participants and non-participants and their families and recruiters. Analyses of these will inform interventions to optimise recruitment. The main study outcomes include recruitment rate (primary outcome), identification of strategies to optimise recruitment, performance of trial treatment pathways, clinical outcomes and safety of non-operative treatment. We have involved children, young people and parents in study design and delivery.

DISCUSSION

In this study we will explore the feasibility of performing a full efficacy RCT comparing non-operative treatment with appendicectomy in children with acute uncomplicated appendicitis. Factors determining success of the present study include recruitment rate, safety of non-operative treatment and adequate interest in the future RCT. Ultimately this feasibility study will form the foundation of the main RCT and reinforce its design.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ISRCTN15830435 . Registered on 8 February 2017.

摘要

背景

目前,英国急性阑尾炎的常规治疗方法是阑尾切除术。然而,对于成人和儿童阑尾炎的非手术治疗,科学兴趣和研究日益增加。虽然有多项研究调查了成人阑尾炎的非手术治疗,但这项研究不能应用于儿科人群。最终,我们旨在开展一项基于英国的多中心随机对照试验(RCT),以测试与阑尾切除术相比,儿童急性单纯性阑尾炎非手术治疗的临床和成本效益。首先,我们将进行一项可行性研究,以评估开展此类试验的可行性。

方法/设计:该研究包括一项可行性随机对照试验,嵌套定性研究以优化招募,以及一项卫生经济学子研究。被诊断为急性单纯性阑尾炎且通常会接受阑尾切除术的4至15岁(含)儿童有资格参加随机对照试验。排除标准包括临床/放射学怀疑阑尾穿孔、阑尾肿块或既往阑尾炎非手术治疗史。参与者将被随机分为两组之一。干预组的参与者接受抗生素治疗和定期临床评估,以确保临床症状改善。对照组的参与者将接受阑尾切除术。随机分组将按年龄、性别、症状持续时间和中心进行最小化处理。被邀请参加随机对照试验的儿童及其家庭将被邀请参加嵌入式定性子研究,其中包括记录招募顾问以及随后对参与者、非参与者及其家庭和招募人员的访谈。对这些访谈的分析将为优化招募的干预措施提供信息。主要研究结果包括招募率(主要结果)、确定优化招募的策略、试验治疗途径的实施、临床结果以及非手术治疗的安全性。我们让儿童、青少年及其父母参与了研究设计和实施。

讨论

在本研究中,我们将探讨对急性单纯性阑尾炎儿童进行非手术治疗与阑尾切除术比较的全面疗效随机对照试验的可行性。决定本研究成功的因素包括招募率、非手术治疗的安全性以及对未来随机对照试验的足够兴趣。最终,这项可行性研究将构成主要随机对照试验的基础并强化其设计。

试验注册

ISRCTN15830435。于2017年2月8日注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7543/5833142/406b7fecbdde/13063_2018_2520_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验