• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较宏基因组测序和16S rRNA基因测序在测定肠道相关微生物群的遗传多样性及母婴微生物重叠方面的应用

Comparison of reduced metagenome and 16S rRNA gene sequencing for determination of genetic diversity and mother-child overlap of the gut associated microbiota.

作者信息

Ravi Anuradha, Avershina Ekaterina, Angell Inga Leena, Ludvigsen Jane, Manohar Prasanth, Padmanaban Sumathi, Nachimuthu Ramesh, Snipen Lars, Rudi Knut

机构信息

Faculty of Chemistry, Biotechnology and Food Science, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, Norway.

Antibiotic Resistance and Phage Therapy Laboratory, Department of Biomedical Sciences, School of Bioscience and Technology, Vellore Institute of Technology, Tamil Nadu, India.

出版信息

J Microbiol Methods. 2018 Jun;149:44-52. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2018.02.016. Epub 2018 Mar 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.mimet.2018.02.016
PMID:29501688
Abstract

Use of the 16S rRNA gene in microbiota studies is limited by the lack of taxonomic and functional resolution. High resolution analyses are particularly important for understanding transmission and persistence of bacteria. The aim of our work was therefore to compare a novel reduced metagenome sequencing (RMS) approach with 16S rRNA gene sequencing to determine both the metagenome genetic diversity and the mother-to-child sharing of the microbiota in a cohort of 17 mother-child pairs. We found that although both approaches gave comparable results with respect to sample separation and taxonomy, RMS gave higher resolution and the potential for genomic-/functional assignment. Using RMS we estimated that the metagenome size increased from about 60 Mbp for 4-day-old children to about 225 Mbp for mothers. The 4-day-old children shared 7% of the metagenome sequences with the mothers, while the metagenome sequence sharing was >30% among the mothers. We found 15 genomes shared across >50% of the mothers, of which 10 belonged to Clostridia. Only Bacteroides showed a direct mother-child association, with B. vulgatus being abundant in both 4-day-old children and mothers. For the functional assignments, we identified a significant association between antibiotic usage during labor, and quantity of Fosfomycin resistance genes. In conclusion, our results show a higher functional and taxonomic resolution for RMS compared to 16S rRNA gene sequencing, where RMS enabled a detailed description of mother to child gut microbiota transmission - supporting a late recruitment of most gut bacteria and an effect of antibiotic treatment during labor on infant antibiotic resistance gene patterns.

摘要

在微生物群研究中,16S rRNA基因的使用受到分类学和功能分辨率不足的限制。高分辨率分析对于理解细菌的传播和持久性尤为重要。因此,我们研究的目的是比较一种新型的简化宏基因组测序(RMS)方法与16S rRNA基因测序,以确定17对母婴队列中宏基因组的遗传多样性以及母婴之间微生物群的共享情况。我们发现,尽管两种方法在样本分离和分类学方面给出了可比的结果,但RMS具有更高的分辨率以及进行基因组/功能分配的潜力。使用RMS,我们估计宏基因组大小从4日龄婴儿的约60 Mbp增加到母亲的约225 Mbp。4日龄婴儿与母亲共享7%的宏基因组序列,而母亲之间的宏基因组序列共享率>30%。我们发现15个基因组在>50%的母亲中共享,其中10个属于梭菌纲。只有拟杆菌显示出直接的母婴关联,4日龄婴儿和母亲中都有大量的普通拟杆菌。对于功能分配,我们确定了分娩期间抗生素使用与磷霉素抗性基因数量之间存在显著关联。总之,我们的结果表明,与16S rRNA基因测序相比,RMS具有更高的功能和分类分辨率,RMS能够详细描述母婴肠道微生物群的传播——支持大多数肠道细菌的后期定植以及分娩期间抗生素治疗对婴儿抗生素抗性基因模式的影响。

相似文献

1
Comparison of reduced metagenome and 16S rRNA gene sequencing for determination of genetic diversity and mother-child overlap of the gut associated microbiota.比较宏基因组测序和16S rRNA基因测序在测定肠道相关微生物群的遗传多样性及母婴微生物重叠方面的应用
J Microbiol Methods. 2018 Jun;149:44-52. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2018.02.016. Epub 2018 Mar 1.
2
Fecal Microbiota Nutrient Utilization Potential Suggests Mucins as Drivers for Initial Gut Colonization of Mother-Child-Shared Bacteria.粪便微生物群营养利用潜力表明黏蛋白是母婴共享细菌初始肠道定植的驱动因素。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2021 Feb 26;87(6). doi: 10.1128/AEM.02201-20.
3
Comparison between 16S rRNA and shotgun sequencing data for the taxonomic characterization of the gut microbiota.16S rRNA 与鸟枪法测序数据比较用于肠道微生物群落的分类学特征分析。
Sci Rep. 2021 Feb 4;11(1):3030. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-82726-y.
4
Deciphering intra-species bacterial diversity of meat and seafood spoilage microbiota using gyrB amplicon sequencing: A comparative analysis with 16S rDNA V3-V4 amplicon sequencing.利用 gyrB 扩增子测序破译肉类和海鲜腐败微生物群的种内细菌多样性:与 16S rDNA V3-V4 扩增子测序的比较分析。
PLoS One. 2018 Sep 25;13(9):e0204629. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204629. eCollection 2018.
5
Intrinsic challenges in ancient microbiome reconstruction using 16S rRNA gene amplification.使用16S rRNA基因扩增技术重建古代微生物群落所面临的内在挑战。
Sci Rep. 2015 Nov 13;5:16498. doi: 10.1038/srep16498.
6
Marker genes as predictors of shared genomic function.标记基因作为共享基因组功能的预测因子。
BMC Genomics. 2019 Apr 4;20(1):268. doi: 10.1186/s12864-019-5641-1.
7
Prenatal and postnatal antibiotic exposure influences the gut microbiota of preterm infants in neonatal intensive care units.产前和产后抗生素暴露会影响新生儿重症监护病房早产儿的肠道微生物群。
Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2018 Mar 19;17(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s12941-018-0264-y.
8
Diversity and composition of gut microbiome of cervical cancer patients: Do results of 16S rRNA sequencing and whole genome sequencing approaches align?宫颈癌患者肠道微生物组的多样性和组成:16S rRNA 测序和全基因组测序方法的结果是否一致?
J Microbiol Methods. 2021 Jun;185:106213. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2021.106213. Epub 2021 Mar 27.
9
Unravelling the evolutionary dynamics of antibiotic resistance genes in the infant gut microbiota during the first four months of life.揭示生命最初四个月婴儿肠道微生物群中抗生素耐药基因的进化动态。
Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2024 Aug 13;23(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s12941-024-00725-z.
10
Capturing the diversity of the human gut microbiota through culture-enriched molecular profiling.通过培养富集分子谱分析捕捉人类肠道微生物群的多样性。
Genome Med. 2016 Jul 1;8(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s13073-016-0327-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Gut microbiota alterations in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis and osteopenia from Shanghai, China.中国上海绝经后骨质疏松症和低骨量妇女的肠道菌群改变。
PeerJ. 2024 May 31;12:e17416. doi: 10.7717/peerj.17416. eCollection 2024.
2
Readsynth: short-read simulation for consideration of composition-biases in reduced metagenome sequencing approaches.Readsynth:用于考虑减少宏基因组测序方法中组成偏差的短读模拟。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2024 May 15;25(1):191. doi: 10.1186/s12859-024-05809-3.
3
Comparative analysis of shotgun metagenomics and 16S rDNA sequencing of gut microbiota in migratory seagulls.
迁徙海鸥肠道微生物组的鸟枪法宏基因组学和 16S rDNA 测序的比较分析。
PeerJ. 2023 Nov 3;11:e16394. doi: 10.7717/peerj.16394. eCollection 2023.
4
Metagenomics analysis of the neonatal intestinal resistome.新生儿肠道耐药基因组的宏基因组学分析。
Front Pediatr. 2023 Jun 16;11:1169651. doi: 10.3389/fped.2023.1169651. eCollection 2023.
5
Changes in the gut microbiota of osteoporosis patients based on 16S rRNA gene sequencing: a systematic review and meta-analysis.基于 16S rRNA 基因测序的骨质疏松症患者肠道微生物组变化:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2022 Dec 15;23(12):1002-1013. doi: 10.1631/jzus.B2200344.
6
Comparative Analysis of 16S rRNA Gene and Metagenome Sequencing in Pediatric Gut Microbiomes.儿科肠道微生物群中16S rRNA基因与宏基因组测序的比较分析
Front Microbiol. 2021 Jul 15;12:670336. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.670336. eCollection 2021.
7
High-Throughput Absolute Quantification Sequencing Revealed Osteoporosis-Related Gut Microbiota Alterations in Han Chinese Elderly.高通量绝对定量测序揭示汉族老年人骨质疏松相关肠道微生物群变化
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021 Apr 30;11:630372. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.630372. eCollection 2021.
8
Definition of a High-Resolution Molecular Marker for Tracking the Genetic Diversity of the Harmful Algal Species Through Comparative Analysis of Mitochondrial Genomes.通过线粒体基因组比较分析追踪有害藻种遗传多样性的高分辨率分子标记的定义
Front Microbiol. 2021 Mar 24;12:631144. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.631144. eCollection 2021.
9
Reduced metagenome sequencing for strain-resolution taxonomic profiles.减少宏基因组测序以获得基于菌株分辨率的分类特征。
Microbiome. 2021 Mar 29;9(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s40168-021-01019-8.
10
Fecal Microbiota Nutrient Utilization Potential Suggests Mucins as Drivers for Initial Gut Colonization of Mother-Child-Shared Bacteria.粪便微生物群营养利用潜力表明黏蛋白是母婴共享细菌初始肠道定植的驱动因素。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2021 Feb 26;87(6). doi: 10.1128/AEM.02201-20.