Suppr超能文献

该公司的目标是:在跨情境单词学习过程中将所指对象联系起来。

The company objects keep: Linking referents together during cross-situational word learning.

作者信息

Zettersten Martin, Wojcik Erica, Benitez Viridiana L, Saffran Jenny

机构信息

University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1202 W Johnson Street, Madison, WI 53706.

Skidmore College, 815 North Broadway Street, Saratoga Springs, NY 12866.

出版信息

J Mem Lang. 2018 Apr;99:62-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2017.11.001. Epub 2017 Nov 20.

Abstract

Learning the meanings of words involves not only linking individual words to referents but also building a network of connections among entities in the world, concepts, and words. Previous studies reveal that infants and adults track the statistical co-occurrence of labels and objects across multiple ambiguous training instances to learn words. However, it is less clear whether, given distributional or attentional cues, learners also encode associations amongst the novel objects. We investigated the consequences of two types of cues that highlighted object-object links in a cross-situational word learning task: distributional structure - how frequently the referents of novel words occurred together - and visual context - whether the referents were seen on matching backgrounds. Across three experiments, we found that in addition to learning novel words, adults formed connections between frequently co-occurring objects. These findings indicate that learners exploit statistical regularities to form multiple types of associations during word learning.

摘要

学习单词的含义不仅涉及将单个单词与所指对象联系起来,还涉及在世界中的实体、概念和单词之间建立一个联系网络。先前的研究表明,婴儿和成人会在多个模糊的训练实例中追踪标签和物体的统计共现情况来学习单词。然而,不太清楚的是,在给定分布或注意力线索的情况下,学习者是否也会编码新物体之间的关联。我们在一个跨情境单词学习任务中研究了两种突出物体与物体之间联系的线索的影响:分布结构——新单词的所指对象共同出现的频率——以及视觉情境——所指对象是否出现在匹配的背景中。在三个实验中,我们发现,除了学习新单词外,成年人还在频繁共同出现的物体之间建立了联系。这些发现表明,学习者在单词学习过程中利用统计规律来形成多种类型的关联。

相似文献

1
The company objects keep: Linking referents together during cross-situational word learning.
J Mem Lang. 2018 Apr;99:62-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2017.11.001. Epub 2017 Nov 20.
2
A distributional perspective on the gavagai problem in early word learning.
Cognition. 2021 Aug;213:104680. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104680. Epub 2021 Apr 11.
3
Observing and Modeling Developing Knowledge and Uncertainty during Cross-situational Word Learning.
IEEE Trans Cogn Dev Syst. 2018 Jun;10(2):227-236. doi: 10.1109/tcds.2017.2735540. Epub 2017 Aug 3.
4
Cross-Situational Statistical Learning of New Words Despite Bilateral Hippocampal Damage and Severe Amnesia.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2020 Jan 14;13:448. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00448. eCollection 2019.
5
The role of reference in cross-situational word learning.
Cognition. 2018 Jan;170:64-75. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.09.006. Epub 2017 Sep 22.
6
Combining statistics: the role of phonotactics on cross-situational word learning.
Psicol Reflex Crit. 2022 Sep 28;35(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s41155-022-00234-y.
7
Rapid word learning under uncertainty via cross-situational statistics.
Psychol Sci. 2007 May;18(5):414-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01915.x.
8
Infants Encode Phonetic Detail during Cross-Situational Word Learning.
Front Psychol. 2016 Sep 21;7:1419. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01419. eCollection 2016.
9
The interplay of cross-situational word learning and sentence-level constraints.
Cogn Sci. 2015 Jul;39(5):849-89. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12178. Epub 2014 Sep 22.
10
Explicit and implicit memory representations in cross-situational word learning.
Cognition. 2020 Dec;205:104444. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104444. Epub 2020 Oct 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Unlearning Incorrect Associations in Word Learning: Evidence From Eye-Tracking.
Cogn Sci. 2025 Jun;49(6):e70077. doi: 10.1111/cogs.70077.
2
Hippocampal contributions to semantic memory retrieval: Strategy-specific impairments in transient global amnesia.
J Neuropsychol. 2025 Sep;19(3):591-602. doi: 10.1111/jnp.12430. Epub 2025 May 2.
3
A library for innovative category exemplars (ALICE) database: Streamlining research with printable 3D novel objects.
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Oct;56(7):7849-7871. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02458-5. Epub 2024 Aug 2.
4
The effects of bilingualism on children's cross-situational word learning under different variability conditions.
J Exp Child Psychol. 2023 May;229:105621. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2022.105621. Epub 2023 Jan 21.
5
Word Learning as a Window to Memory and Rehabilitation Outcomes in Traumatic Brain Injury.
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2023 Mar 23;32(2S):956-965. doi: 10.1044/2022_AJSLP-22-00073. Epub 2022 Nov 10.
6
Building lexical networks: Preschoolers extract different types of information in cross-situational learning.
J Exp Child Psychol. 2022 Aug;220:105430. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2022.105430. Epub 2022 Apr 11.
7
Semantic Memory and the Hippocampus: Revisiting, Reaffirming, and Extending the Reach of Their Critical Relationship.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2020 Jan 24;13:471. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00471. eCollection 2019.
8
Cross-situational and ostensive word learning in children with and without autism spectrum disorder.
Cognition. 2019 Feb;183:181-191. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.10.025. Epub 2018 Nov 20.

本文引用的文献

1
Observational Word Learning: Beyond Propose-But-Verify and Associative Bean Counting.
J Mem Lang. 2016 Apr 1;87:105-127. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2015.09.005.
2
Predicting the birth of a spoken word.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Oct 13;112(41):12663-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1419773112. Epub 2015 Sep 21.
3
Toddlers encode similarities among novel words from meaningful sentences.
Cognition. 2015 May;138:10-20. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.01.015. Epub 2015 Feb 19.
4
You shall know an object by the company it keeps: An investigation of semantic representations derived from object co-occurrence in visual scenes.
Neuropsychologia. 2015 Sep;76:52-61. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.08.031. Epub 2014 Sep 6.
5
The unrealized promise of infant statistical word-referent learning.
Trends Cogn Sci. 2014 May;18(5):251-8. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2014.02.007. Epub 2014 Mar 14.
6
Cross-situational word learning in the right situations.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2014 May;40(3):892-903. doi: 10.1037/a0035657. Epub 2014 Jan 13.
7
Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal.
J Mem Lang. 2013 Apr;68(3). doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001.
8
The ontogeny of lexical networks: toddlers encode the relationships among referents when learning novel words.
Psychol Sci. 2013 Oct;24(10):1898-905. doi: 10.1177/0956797613478198. Epub 2013 Aug 12.
9
All together now: concurrent learning of multiple structures in an artificial language.
Cogn Sci. 2013 Sep-Oct;37(7):1290-320. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12050. Epub 2013 Jun 14.
10
Random effects structure for testing interactions in linear mixed-effects models.
Front Psychol. 2013 Jun 5;4:328. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00328. eCollection 2013.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验