• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

建立决策树预测危重症患者经幽门后鼻肠管置管成功。

Establishing Decision Trees for Predicting Successful Postpyloric Nasoenteric Tube Placement in Critically Ill Patients.

机构信息

Department of Critical Care Medicine, Guangdong General Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China.

Department of Child Health Care, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou, China.

出版信息

JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2018 Jan;42(1):132-138. doi: 10.1177/0148607116667282. Epub 2017 Dec 11.

DOI:10.1177/0148607116667282
PMID:29505136
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite the use of prokinetic agents, the overall success rate for postpyloric placement via a self-propelled spiral nasoenteric tube is quite low.

METHODS

This retrospective study was conducted in the intensive care units of 11 university hospitals from 2006 to 2016 among adult patients who underwent self-propelled spiral nasoenteric tube insertion. Success was defined as postpyloric nasoenteric tube placement confirmed by abdominal x-ray scan 24 hours after tube insertion. Chi-square automatic interaction detection (CHAID), simple classification and regression trees (SimpleCart), and J48 methodologies were used to develop decision tree models, and multiple logistic regression (LR) methodology was used to develop an LR model for predicting successful postpyloric nasoenteric tube placement. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to evaluate the performance of these models.

RESULTS

Successful postpyloric nasoenteric tube placement was confirmed in 427 of 939 patients enrolled. For predicting successful postpyloric nasoenteric tube placement, the performance of the 3 decision trees was similar in terms of the AUCs: 0.715 for the CHAID model, 0.682 for the SimpleCart model, and 0.671 for the J48 model. The AUC of the LR model was 0.729, which outperformed the J48 model.

CONCLUSION

Both the CHAID and LR models achieved an acceptable discrimination for predicting successful postpyloric nasoenteric tube placement and were useful for intensivists in the setting of self-propelled spiral nasoenteric tube insertion.

摘要

背景

尽管使用了促动力药物,但自行推进螺旋型鼻肠管进行幽门后置管的总体成功率相当低。

方法

本回顾性研究于 2006 年至 2016 年在 11 所大学医院的重症监护病房进行,纳入接受自行推进螺旋型鼻肠管插入术的成年患者。成功定义为插入后 24 小时腹部 X 线扫描确认幽门后置管。采用卡方自动交互检测(CHAID)、简单分类和回归树(SimpleCart)以及 J48 方法建立决策树模型,采用多变量逻辑回归(LR)方法建立预测成功幽门后置管的 LR 模型。使用受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)评估这些模型的性能。

结果

在纳入的 939 例患者中,427 例患者成功进行幽门后置管。对于预测成功幽门后置管,3 个决策树的 AUC 在预测成功幽门后置管方面表现相似:CHAID 模型为 0.715,SimpleCart 模型为 0.682,J48 模型为 0.671。LR 模型的 AUC 为 0.729,优于 J48 模型。

结论

CHAID 和 LR 模型在预测成功幽门后置管方面均具有可接受的判别能力,对于自行推进螺旋型鼻肠管插入术的重症监护医生具有一定的实用价值。

相似文献

1
Establishing Decision Trees for Predicting Successful Postpyloric Nasoenteric Tube Placement in Critically Ill Patients.建立决策树预测危重症患者经幽门后鼻肠管置管成功。
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2018 Jan;42(1):132-138. doi: 10.1177/0148607116667282. Epub 2017 Dec 11.
2
Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting self-propelled postpyloric placement of spiral nasoenteric tube in the critically ill: Mixed retrospective and prospective cohort study.开发并验证了一种列线图,用于预测危重症患者螺旋型鼻肠管自主经幽门后位放置:混合回顾性和前瞻性队列研究。
Clin Nutr. 2019 Dec;38(6):2799-2805. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2018.12.008. Epub 2018 Dec 11.
3
Blind bedside postpyloric placement of spiral tube as rescue therapy in critically ill patients: a prospective, tricentric, observational study.盲插床边螺旋型鼻肠管在危重症患者中的应用:一项前瞻性、三中心、观察性研究。
Crit Care. 2017 Sep 26;21(1):248. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1839-2.
4
Successful postpyloric feeding tube insertion using prokinetic drugs for nasoenteric tube placement: A network meta-analysis.使用促动力药物进行鼻肠管置管术以成功置管幽门后:一项网状荟萃分析。
Nutr Clin Pract. 2022 Aug;37(4):773-782. doi: 10.1002/ncp.10834. Epub 2022 Feb 27.
5
Endoscopic placement of nasoenteric feeding tubes in critically ill patients: a reliable alternative.危重症患者鼻肠饲管的内镜置入:一种可靠的替代方法
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 1998 Dec;8(6):395-400. doi: 10.1089/lap.1998.8.395.
6
Bedside sonographic-guided versus blind nasoenteric feeding tube placement in critically ill patients.危重症患者床边超声引导与盲目放置鼻肠喂养管的比较
Crit Care Med. 1996 Oct;24(10):1690-4. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199610000-00015.
7
A randomized trial of endoscopic and fluoroscopic placement of postpyloric feeding tubes in critically ill patients.一项关于重症患者幽门后喂养管内镜和荧光镜放置的随机试验。
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2004 May-Jun;28(3):154-7. doi: 10.1177/0148607104028003154.
8
Simo decoction versus domperidone suspension for post-pyloric spiral nasoenteric tube placement: A multicenter, randomized, non-inferiority trial.四磨汤口服液对比多潘立酮混悬液用于幽门后螺旋型鼻肠管置管:一项多中心、随机、非劣效性试验。
Clin Nutr. 2020 Aug;39(8):2406-2412. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2019.11.009. Epub 2019 Nov 12.
9
Erythromycin versus metoclopramide for post-pyloric spiral nasoenteric tube placement: a randomized non-inferiority trial.红霉素与甲氧氯普胺在幽门后螺旋型鼻肠管置管中的应用比较:一项随机非劣效性试验。
Intensive Care Med. 2018 Dec;44(12):2174-2182. doi: 10.1007/s00134-018-5466-4. Epub 2018 Nov 21.
10
Erythromycin to promote bedside placement of a self-propelled nasojejunal feeding tube in non-critically ill patients having pancreatitis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.红霉素促进非危重症胰腺炎患者经皮自行推进型鼻空肠管置管:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究。
Nutr Clin Pract. 2011 Apr;26(2):181-5. doi: 10.1177/0884533611399924.

引用本文的文献

1
Machine learning-based model to predict severe acute kidney injury after total aortic arch replacement for acute type A aortic dissection.基于机器学习的模型预测急性A型主动脉夹层全主动脉弓置换术后严重急性肾损伤
Heliyon. 2024 Jul 5;10(13):e34171. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34171. eCollection 2024 Jul 15.
2
Construction, validation, and visualization of a web-based nomogram to predict overall survival in small-cell lung cancer patients with brain metastasis.构建、验证和可视化基于网络的列线图,以预测有脑转移的小细胞肺癌患者的总生存期。
Cancer Causes Control. 2024 Mar;35(3):465-475. doi: 10.1007/s10552-023-01805-9. Epub 2023 Oct 16.
3
A visualized dynamic prediction model for overall survival in patients diagnosed with brain metastases from lung squamous cell carcinoma.
一个用于诊断为肺鳞癌脑转移患者的总生存的可视化动态预测模型。
Clin Respir J. 2023 Jun;17(6):556-567. doi: 10.1111/crj.13625. Epub 2023 Apr 29.
4
Nasointestinal tube placement: Techniques that increase success.鼻肠管置入:提高成功率的技术。
J Intensive Care Soc. 2023 Feb;24(1):62-70. doi: 10.1177/17511437221095336. Epub 2022 May 27.
5
Ventilator-associated pneumonia prevention in the Intensive care unit using Postpyloric tube feeding in China (VIP study): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.中国 ICU 应用幽门后管饲预防呼吸机相关性肺炎(VIP 研究):一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2022 Jun 9;23(1):478. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06407-5.
6
A Two-Stage Bedside Intubation Method to Improve Success Rate of Post-pyloric Placement of Spiral Nasoenteric Tubes in Critically Ill Patients: A Multi-Center, Prospective Study.一种提高危重症患者螺旋型鼻肠管幽门后置管成功率的两阶段床边插管方法:一项多中心前瞻性研究
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 May 12;9:875298. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.875298. eCollection 2022.
7
Development and Validation of a Nomogram Incorporating Colloid Osmotic Pressure for Predicting Mortality in Critically Ill Neurological Patients.纳入胶体渗透压的列线图用于预测重症神经科患者死亡率的开发与验证
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Dec 24;8:765818. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.765818. eCollection 2021.
8
Nursing effect of Nasoscopically assisted nasogastri tube and nasojejunal tube placement.鼻内镜辅助下鼻胃管和鼻空肠管置入的护理效果
Am J Transl Res. 2021 Sep 15;13(9):10758-10764. eCollection 2021.
9
Is metoclopramide beneficial for the postpyloric placement of nasoenteric tubes? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.甲氧氯普胺是否有利于鼻肠管在幽门后部位的放置?一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Nutr Clin Pract. 2022 Apr;37(2):316-327. doi: 10.1002/ncp.10725. Epub 2021 Jun 22.
10
Deep learning enables robust assessment and selection of human blastocysts after in vitro fertilization.深度学习有助于在体外受精后对人类囊胚进行可靠的评估和筛选。
NPJ Digit Med. 2019 Apr 4;2:21. doi: 10.1038/s41746-019-0096-y. eCollection 2019.