• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种提高危重症患者螺旋型鼻肠管幽门后置管成功率的两阶段床边插管方法:一项多中心前瞻性研究

A Two-Stage Bedside Intubation Method to Improve Success Rate of Post-pyloric Placement of Spiral Nasoenteric Tubes in Critically Ill Patients: A Multi-Center, Prospective Study.

作者信息

Xu Jing, Li Sinian, Chen Xiangyin, Tan Bo, Chen Shenglong, Hu Bei, Nie Zhiqiang, Ye Heng, Sun Cheng, Chi Ruibin, Chen Chunbo

机构信息

Department of Intensive Care Unit of Cardiovascular Surgery, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China.

Department of Critical Care Medicine, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China.

出版信息

Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 May 12;9:875298. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.875298. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fmed.2022.875298
PMID:35646990
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9134184/
Abstract

BACKGROUNDS

Prokinetic agents could improve the success rate of post-pyloric placement of self-propelled spiral nasoenteric tubes (NETs), and bedside blind technique might apply as a rescue therapy subsequent to spontaneous transpyloric migration failure. The objective of this study was to investigated the validity and safety of these two bedside intubation methods as a sequential procedure for post-pyloric placement of spiral NETs in critically ill patients.

METHODS

The multicenter, prospective study was conducted in intensive care units of four tertiary hospitals (June 2020 to January 2021). Eligible patients received self-propelled spiral NET placements, promoted by prokinetic agents (Stage 1). An abdominal X-ray performed 24 h post-intubation confirmed the position of the tube tip. Patients with a failed transpyloric migration entered Stage 2, where beside blind intubation was conducted (reconfirmed by X-ray). The primary end point was the overall success rate of post-pyloric placement.

RESULTS

The overall success rate of post-pyloric placement of the spiral NET was 91.1% (73.4% in the third portion of the duodenum [D3] or beyond). The total adverse event rate was 21.0%, without any serious adverse events. In Stage 1, 55.6% of participants achieved transpyloric migration, of these, 44.4% migrated to D3 or beyond. The median time from decision to intubate to the initiation of enteral nutrition (EN) was 25 h. In Stage 2, 83.0% of patients had successful post-pyloric intubation (67.9% in D3 or beyond). The median time from decision to EN initiation after the two-stage process was 36 h.

CONCLUSIONS

Prokinetic agents-assisted self-propelled intubation and remedial bedside blind technique as a sequential procedure for post-pyloric placement of spiral NETs were effective and safe, and this two-stage process did not affect the implementation of early EN in critically ill patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR1900026381. Registered on 6 October 2019.

摘要

背景

促动力药物可提高自推进式螺旋鼻肠管(NETs)幽门后置管的成功率,床边盲插技术可作为自发经幽门迁移失败后的补救治疗方法。本研究的目的是探讨这两种床边插管方法作为重症患者螺旋NETs幽门后置管序贯程序的有效性和安全性。

方法

这项多中心前瞻性研究在四家三级医院的重症监护病房进行(2020年6月至2021年1月)。符合条件的患者接受促动力药物辅助的自推进式螺旋NETs置管(第1阶段)。插管后24小时进行腹部X线检查以确认管尖位置。经幽门迁移失败的患者进入第2阶段,在此阶段进行床边盲插(经X线再次确认)。主要终点是幽门后置管的总体成功率。

结果

螺旋NETs幽门后置管的总体成功率为91.1%(十二指肠第三部[D3]或更远部位为73.4%)。总不良事件发生率为21.0%,无严重不良事件。在第1阶段,55.6%的参与者实现了经幽门迁移,其中44.4%迁移至D3或更远部位。从决定插管到开始肠内营养(EN)的中位时间为25小时。在第2阶段,83.0%的患者幽门后置管成功(D3或更远部位为67.9%)。两阶段过程后从决定到开始EN的中位时间为36小时。

结论

促动力药物辅助的自推进式插管和补救性床边盲插技术作为螺旋NETs幽门后置管的序贯程序是有效且安全的,并且这一两阶段过程不影响重症患者早期EN的实施。

试验注册

中国临床试验注册中心,ChiCTR1900026381。于2019年10月6日注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf5f/9134184/837701e4e8b6/fmed-09-875298-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf5f/9134184/837701e4e8b6/fmed-09-875298-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf5f/9134184/837701e4e8b6/fmed-09-875298-g0001.jpg

相似文献

1
A Two-Stage Bedside Intubation Method to Improve Success Rate of Post-pyloric Placement of Spiral Nasoenteric Tubes in Critically Ill Patients: A Multi-Center, Prospective Study.一种提高危重症患者螺旋型鼻肠管幽门后置管成功率的两阶段床边插管方法:一项多中心前瞻性研究
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 May 12;9:875298. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.875298. eCollection 2022.
2
Blind bedside postpyloric placement of spiral tube as rescue therapy in critically ill patients: a prospective, tricentric, observational study.盲插床边螺旋型鼻肠管在危重症患者中的应用:一项前瞻性、三中心、观察性研究。
Crit Care. 2017 Sep 26;21(1):248. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1839-2.
3
Erythromycin versus metoclopramide for post-pyloric spiral nasoenteric tube placement: a randomized non-inferiority trial.红霉素与甲氧氯普胺在幽门后螺旋型鼻肠管置管中的应用比较:一项随机非劣效性试验。
Intensive Care Med. 2018 Dec;44(12):2174-2182. doi: 10.1007/s00134-018-5466-4. Epub 2018 Nov 21.
4
Simo decoction versus domperidone suspension for post-pyloric spiral nasoenteric tube placement: A multicenter, randomized, non-inferiority trial.四磨汤口服液对比多潘立酮混悬液用于幽门后螺旋型鼻肠管置管:一项多中心、随机、非劣效性试验。
Clin Nutr. 2020 Aug;39(8):2406-2412. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2019.11.009. Epub 2019 Nov 12.
5
Metoclopramide or domperidone improves post-pyloric placement of spiral nasojejunal tubes in critically ill patients: a prospective, multicenter, open-label, randomized, controlled clinical trial.甲氧氯普胺或多潘立酮可改善危重症患者螺旋型鼻空肠管的幽门后置入:一项前瞻性、多中心、开放标签、随机对照临床试验。
Crit Care. 2015 Feb 13;19(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-0784-1.
6
Bedside sonographic-guided versus blind nasoenteric feeding tube placement in critically ill patients.危重症患者床边超声引导与盲目放置鼻肠喂养管的比较
Crit Care Med. 1996 Oct;24(10):1690-4. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199610000-00015.
7
Intravenous Metoclopramide to Improve the Success Rate of Blind Bedside Post-pyloric Placement of Feeding Tube in Critically Ill Children: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study.静脉注射甲氧氯普胺提高危重症儿童床边盲插幽门后置入喂养管成功率的随机双盲安慰剂对照研究
Front Pediatr. 2021 Dec 22;9:739247. doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.739247. eCollection 2021.
8
Establishing Decision Trees for Predicting Successful Postpyloric Nasoenteric Tube Placement in Critically Ill Patients.建立决策树预测危重症患者经幽门后鼻肠管置管成功。
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2018 Jan;42(1):132-138. doi: 10.1177/0148607116667282. Epub 2017 Dec 11.
9
Video-assisted placement of enteral feeding tubes using the Integrated Real-Time Imaging System (IRIS)-technology in critically ill patients.在重症患者中使用集成实时成像系统(IRIS)技术进行视频辅助放置肠内喂养管
Clin Nutr. 2021 Aug;40(8):5000-5007. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2021.07.026. Epub 2021 Jul 30.
10
Erythromycin to promote bedside placement of a self-propelled nasojejunal feeding tube in non-critically ill patients having pancreatitis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.红霉素促进非危重症胰腺炎患者经皮自行推进型鼻空肠管置管:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究。
Nutr Clin Pract. 2011 Apr;26(2):181-5. doi: 10.1177/0884533611399924.

引用本文的文献

1
Qualitative study on the ability of neurological nurses to manage patients with indwelling gastrointestinal canal.神经内科护士管理留置胃肠管患者能力的质性研究
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Dec 3;11:1403173. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1403173. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Is metoclopramide beneficial for the postpyloric placement of nasoenteric tubes? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.甲氧氯普胺是否有利于鼻肠管在幽门后部位的放置?一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Nutr Clin Pract. 2022 Apr;37(2):316-327. doi: 10.1002/ncp.10725. Epub 2021 Jun 22.
2
Blind placement of postpyloric feeding tubes at the bedside in intensive care.在重症监护病房床边盲插幽门后喂养管。
Crit Care. 2021 May 11;25(1):168. doi: 10.1186/s13054-021-03587-5.
3
Early enteral nutrition and factors related to in-hospital mortality in people on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.
体外膜肺氧合患者的早期肠内营养与院内死亡率相关因素。
Nutrition. 2021 Sep;89:111222. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2021.111222. Epub 2021 Feb 28.
4
Ultrasonography-guided post-pyloric feeding tube insertion in medical intensive care unit patients.超声引导下经胃后喂养管置入在重症监护病房患者中的应用。
J Clin Monit Comput. 2022 Apr;36(2):451-459. doi: 10.1007/s10877-021-00672-6. Epub 2021 Feb 18.
5
Gastric-tube versus post-pyloric feeding in critical patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of pulmonary aspiration- and nutrition-related outcomes.胃管喂养与幽门后喂养在危重症患者中的比较:一项关于肺吸入和营养相关结局的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2021 Sep;75(9):1337-1348. doi: 10.1038/s41430-021-00860-2. Epub 2021 Feb 3.
6
Electromagnetic-guided versus endoscopic placement of post-pyloric feeding tubes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.电磁引导与内镜下幽门后喂养管置入:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
J Intensive Care. 2020 Dec 10;8(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s40560-020-00506-8.
7
Clinical Nutrition of Critically Ill Patients in the Context of the Latest ESPEN Guidelines.危重症患者临床营养治疗:ESPEN 指南解读。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2019 Dec 2;55(12):770. doi: 10.3390/medicina55120770.
8
Simo decoction versus domperidone suspension for post-pyloric spiral nasoenteric tube placement: A multicenter, randomized, non-inferiority trial.四磨汤口服液对比多潘立酮混悬液用于幽门后螺旋型鼻肠管置管:一项多中心、随机、非劣效性试验。
Clin Nutr. 2020 Aug;39(8):2406-2412. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2019.11.009. Epub 2019 Nov 12.
9
Early enteral nutrition (within 48 hours) versus delayed enteral nutrition (after 48 hours) with or without supplemental parenteral nutrition in critically ill adults.危重症成年患者早期肠内营养(48小时内)与延迟肠内营养(48小时后)加或不加补充性肠外营养的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Oct 31;2019(10):CD012340. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012340.pub2.
10
The Effect of Enteral Tube Feeding on Patients' Health-Related Quality of Life: A Systematic Review.肠内管饲对患者健康相关生活质量的影响:系统评价。
Nutrients. 2019 May 10;11(5):1046. doi: 10.3390/nu11051046.