Department of Critical Care Medicine, Guangdong General Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, 106 Zhongshan Er Road, Guangzhou, 510080, Guangdong Province, People's Republic of China.
School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou Higher Education Mega Center, Guangzhou, 510006, Guangdong Province, People's Republic of China.
Crit Care. 2017 Sep 26;21(1):248. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1839-2.
Various special techniques for blind bedside transpyloric tube placement have been introduced into clinical practice. However, transpyloric spiral tube placement facilitated by a blind bedside method has not yet been reported. The objective of this prospective study was to evaluate the safety and efficiency of blind bedside postpyloric placement of a spiral tube as a rescue therapy subsequent to failed spontaneous transpyloric migration in critically ill patients.
This prospective, tricentric, observational study was conducted in the intensive care units (ICUs) of three tertiary hospitals. A total of 127 consecutive patients with failed spontaneous transpyloric spiral tube migration despite using prokinetic agents and still required enteral nutrition for more than 3 days were included. The spiral tube was inserted postpylorically using the blind bedside technique. All patients received metoclopramide intravenously prior to tube insertion. The exact tube tip position was determined by radiography. The primary efficacy endpoint was the success rate of postpyloric spiral tube placement. Secondary efficacy endpoints were success rate of a spiral tube placed in the third portion of the duodenum (D3) or beyond, success rate of placement in the proximal jejunum, time to insertion, length of insertion, and number of attempts. Safety endpoints were metoclopramide-related and major adverse tube-associated events.
In 81.9% of patients, the spiral feeding tubes were placed postpylorically; of these, 55.1% were placed in D3 or beyond and 33.9% were placed in the proximal jejunum, with a median time to insertion of 14 min and an average number of attempts of 1.4. The mean length of insertion was 95.6 cm. The adverse event incidence was 26.0%, and no serious adverse event was observed.
Blind bedside postpyloric placement of a spiral tube, as a rescue therapy subsequent to failed spontaneous transpyloric migration in critically ill patients, is safe and effective. This technique may facilitate the early initiation of postpyloric feeding in the ICU.
Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR-OPN-16008206 . Registered on 1 April 2016.
各种盲探经皮幽门置管的特殊技术已应用于临床实践中。然而,盲探床边幽门螺旋管置管尚未见报道。本前瞻性研究的目的是评估盲探床边置管法在危重症患者中对经皮螺旋管经自然途径幽门迁移失败后的补救治疗的安全性和有效性。
这是一项在三家三级医院的重症监护病房(ICU)进行的前瞻性、三中心、观察性研究。共纳入 127 例因经皮螺旋管经自然途径幽门迁移失败,且在使用促动力药物后仍需要肠内营养 3 天以上的连续患者。使用盲探床边技术将螺旋管置于幽门后。所有患者在置管前均静脉注射甲氧氯普胺。通过 X 线确定管尖端的确切位置。主要疗效终点是幽门后置入螺旋管的成功率。次要疗效终点是十二指肠第三部分(D3)或更远的螺旋管成功率、空肠近端置管成功率、置管时间、置管长度和置管次数。安全性终点是与甲氧氯普胺相关的和主要不良的管相关事件。
81.9%的患者经幽门后置入螺旋喂养管,其中 55.1%的患者置于 D3 或更远,33.9%的患者置于空肠近端,置管时间中位数为 14 分钟,平均尝试次数为 1.4 次。置管长度平均为 95.6cm。不良事件发生率为 26.0%,未观察到严重不良事件。
盲探床边经皮幽门置管,作为经皮螺旋管经自然途径幽门迁移失败后危重症患者的补救治疗,是安全有效的。该技术可能有助于在 ICU 中早期开始经幽门喂养。
中国临床试验注册中心,ChiCTR-OPN-16008206。注册于 2016 年 4 月 1 日。