Suppr超能文献

质量关怀问卷-姑息治疗(QCQ-PC)的制定与验证:姑息治疗质量的患者报告评估。

Development and validation of the quality care questionnaire -palliative care (QCQ-PC): patient-reported assessment of quality of palliative care.

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, 103 Daehak-ro, Jongno-GU, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea.

Department of Biomedical Informatics, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.

出版信息

BMC Palliat Care. 2018 Mar 5;17(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s12904-018-0296-2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In this study, we aimed to develop and validate an instrument that could be used by patients with cancer to evaluate their quality of palliative care.

METHODS

Development of the questionnaire followed the four-phase process: item generation and reduction, construction, pilot testing, and field testing. Based on the literature, we constructed a list of items for the quality of palliative care from 104 quality care issues divided into 14 subscales. We constructed scales of 43 items that only the cancer patients were asked to answer. Using relevance and feasibility criteria and pilot testing, we developed a 44-item questionnaire. To assess the sensitivity and validity of the questionnaire, we recruited 220 patients over 18 years of age from three Korean hospitals.

RESULTS

Factor analysis of the data and fit statistics process resulted in the 4-factor, 32-item Quality Care Questionnaire-Palliative Care (QCQ-PC), which covers appropriate communication with health care professionals (ten items), discussing value of life and goals of care (nine items), support and counseling for needs of holistic care (seven items), and accessibility and sustainability of care (six items). All subscales and total scores showed a high internal consistency (Cronbach alpha range, 0.89 to 0.97). Multi-trait scaling analysis showed good convergent (0.568-0.995) and discriminant (0.472-0.869) validity. The correlation between the total and subscale scores of QCQ-PC and those of EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL, MQOL, SAT-SF, and DCS was obtained.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that the QCQ-PC can be adopted to assess the quality of care in patients with cancer.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在开发并验证一种可由癌症患者用于评估姑息治疗质量的工具。

方法

问卷的开发遵循四阶段流程:项目生成和精简、构建、试点测试和现场测试。根据文献,我们从 104 个质量护理问题中构建了一个姑息治疗质量清单,分为 14 个分量表。我们构建了仅癌症患者回答的 43 个项目的量表。使用相关性和可行性标准以及试点测试,我们开发了一个 44 项的问卷。为了评估问卷的敏感性和有效性,我们从三家韩国医院招募了 220 名 18 岁以上的患者。

结果

对数据的因素分析和拟合统计过程得出了 4 个因素、32 个项目的姑息治疗质量关怀问卷(QCQ-PC),涵盖了与医疗保健专业人员的适当沟通(10 个项目)、讨论生命价值和护理目标(9 个项目)、支持和咨询整体护理需求(7 个项目)以及护理的可及性和可持续性(6 个项目)。所有分量表和总分均表现出较高的内部一致性(Cronbach alpha 范围为 0.89 至 0.97)。多特质标度分析显示了良好的收敛(0.568-0.995)和区分(0.472-0.869)有效性。获得了 QCQ-PC 的总分和分量表得分与 EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL、MQOL、SAT-SF 和 DCS 的总分和分量表得分之间的相关性。

结论

本研究表明,QCQ-PC 可用于评估癌症患者的护理质量。

相似文献

2
Cross-cultural verification of the EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL questionnaire in mainland China.
Palliat Med. 2016 Apr;30(4):401-8. doi: 10.1177/0269216315593671. Epub 2015 Jun 29.
6
Psychometric properties of the Arabic version of EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL among cancer patients in Jordan.
Support Care Cancer. 2016 Jun;24(6):2455-62. doi: 10.1007/s00520-015-3018-9. Epub 2015 Dec 11.

引用本文的文献

3
Development and Validation of Total Pain Scale for Evaluation of Total Pain in Cancer Patients.
Indian J Palliat Care. 2023 Jul-Sep;29(3):312-323. doi: 10.25259/IJPC_256_2022. Epub 2023 Jul 11.
9
Psychometric Properties of the 'Patients' Perspective of the Quality of Palliative Care Scale'.
Indian J Palliat Care. 2022 Jan-Mar;28(1):64-74. doi: 10.25259/IJPC_72_2021. Epub 2022 Mar 9.

本文引用的文献

1
Patient- and Caregiver-Reported Assessment Tools for Palliative Care: Summary of the 2017 Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Technical Brief.
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2017 Dec;54(6):961-972.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2017.04.022. Epub 2017 Aug 15.
2
4
Making sense of Cronbach's alpha.
Int J Med Educ. 2011 Jun 27;2:53-55. doi: 10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd.
5
Effects of Early Integrated Palliative Care in Patients With Lung and GI Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Mar 10;35(8):834-841. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.70.5046. Epub 2016 Dec 28.
6
Cross-cultural verification of the EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL questionnaire in mainland China.
Palliat Med. 2016 Apr;30(4):401-8. doi: 10.1177/0269216315593671. Epub 2015 Jun 29.
7
Validation of the German Version of the Quality of Dying and Death Questionnaire for Informal Caregivers (QODD-D-Ang).
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2015 Sep;50(3):402-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2015.03.020. Epub 2015 Jun 14.
9
10
Prior Study of Cross-Cultural Validation of McGill Quality-of-Life Questionnaire in Mainland Mandarin Chinese Patients With Cancer.
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2015 Nov;32(7):709-14. doi: 10.1177/1049909114537400. Epub 2014 Jun 16.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验