Department of Family Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, 103 Daehak-ro, Jongno-GU, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea.
Department of Biomedical Informatics, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
BMC Palliat Care. 2018 Mar 5;17(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s12904-018-0296-2.
In this study, we aimed to develop and validate an instrument that could be used by patients with cancer to evaluate their quality of palliative care.
Development of the questionnaire followed the four-phase process: item generation and reduction, construction, pilot testing, and field testing. Based on the literature, we constructed a list of items for the quality of palliative care from 104 quality care issues divided into 14 subscales. We constructed scales of 43 items that only the cancer patients were asked to answer. Using relevance and feasibility criteria and pilot testing, we developed a 44-item questionnaire. To assess the sensitivity and validity of the questionnaire, we recruited 220 patients over 18 years of age from three Korean hospitals.
Factor analysis of the data and fit statistics process resulted in the 4-factor, 32-item Quality Care Questionnaire-Palliative Care (QCQ-PC), which covers appropriate communication with health care professionals (ten items), discussing value of life and goals of care (nine items), support and counseling for needs of holistic care (seven items), and accessibility and sustainability of care (six items). All subscales and total scores showed a high internal consistency (Cronbach alpha range, 0.89 to 0.97). Multi-trait scaling analysis showed good convergent (0.568-0.995) and discriminant (0.472-0.869) validity. The correlation between the total and subscale scores of QCQ-PC and those of EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL, MQOL, SAT-SF, and DCS was obtained.
This study demonstrates that the QCQ-PC can be adopted to assess the quality of care in patients with cancer.
本研究旨在开发并验证一种可由癌症患者用于评估姑息治疗质量的工具。
问卷的开发遵循四阶段流程:项目生成和精简、构建、试点测试和现场测试。根据文献,我们从 104 个质量护理问题中构建了一个姑息治疗质量清单,分为 14 个分量表。我们构建了仅癌症患者回答的 43 个项目的量表。使用相关性和可行性标准以及试点测试,我们开发了一个 44 项的问卷。为了评估问卷的敏感性和有效性,我们从三家韩国医院招募了 220 名 18 岁以上的患者。
对数据的因素分析和拟合统计过程得出了 4 个因素、32 个项目的姑息治疗质量关怀问卷(QCQ-PC),涵盖了与医疗保健专业人员的适当沟通(10 个项目)、讨论生命价值和护理目标(9 个项目)、支持和咨询整体护理需求(7 个项目)以及护理的可及性和可持续性(6 个项目)。所有分量表和总分均表现出较高的内部一致性(Cronbach alpha 范围为 0.89 至 0.97)。多特质标度分析显示了良好的收敛(0.568-0.995)和区分(0.472-0.869)有效性。获得了 QCQ-PC 的总分和分量表得分与 EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL、MQOL、SAT-SF 和 DCS 的总分和分量表得分之间的相关性。
本研究表明,QCQ-PC 可用于评估癌症患者的护理质量。