• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

主动脉僵硬度可有效对疑似心肌缺血行血管扩张性应激灌注心脏磁共振的糖尿病患者进行危险分层。

Aortic stiffness effectively risk stratifies diabetic patients with suspected myocardial ischemia undergoing vasodilatory stress perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance.

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand.

Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Rajavithi Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.

出版信息

BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2023 Oct 10;23(1):502. doi: 10.1186/s12872-023-03532-0.

DOI:10.1186/s12872-023-03532-0
PMID:37817068
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10566029/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) comprehensively assesses aortic stiffness and myocardial ischemia in a single examination. Aortic stiffness represents a subclinical marker of cardiovascular risk in the general population, including patients with diabetes mellitus. However, there is no prognostic data regarding aortic stiffness in patients with diabetes mellitus undergoing stress perfusion CMR.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with diabetes mellitus with suspected myocardial ischemia referred for adenosine stress perfusion CMR with aortic pulse wave velocity (PWV) during 2010-2013 were studied. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as the composite of cardiac mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), hospitalization for heart failure, coronary revascularization (> 90 days post-CMR), and ischemic stroke. The secondary outcome was hard cardiac events, defined as the composite of cardiac mortality and nonfatal MI.

RESULTS

A total of 424 patients (median follow-up 7.2 years) were included. The mean PWV was 12.16 ± 6.28 m/s. MACE and hard cardiac events occurred in 26.8% and 9.4% of patients, respectively. Patients with elevated PWV (> 12.16 m/s) had a significantly higher incidence of MACE (HR 2.14 [95%CI 1.48, 3.09], p < 0.001) and hard cardiac events (HR 2.69 [95%CI 1.42, 5.10], p = 0.002) compared to those with non-elevated PWV. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that PWV independently predicts MACE (p = 0.003) and hard cardiac events (p = 0.01). Addition of PWV provided incremental prognostic value beyond clinical data, left ventricular mass index, myocardial ischemia, and late gadolinium enhancement in predicting MACE (incremental χ² 7.54, p = 0.006) and hard cardiac events (incremental χ² 5.99, p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Aortic stiffness measured by CMR independently predicts MACE and hard cardiac events and confers significant incremental prognostic value in patients with diabetes mellitus with suspected myocardial ischemia. Aortic stiffness measurement could potentially be considered as part of a stress perfusion CMR protocol to enhance risk prediction in patients with diabetes mellitus.

摘要

背景和目的

心血管磁共振(CMR)可在单次检查中全面评估主动脉僵硬度和心肌缺血。主动脉僵硬度是一般人群心血管风险的亚临床标志物,包括糖尿病患者。然而,对于接受腺苷负荷灌注 CMR 的糖尿病患者,尚无关于主动脉僵硬度的预后数据。

方法

对 2010 年至 2013 年期间因疑似心肌缺血而行腺苷负荷灌注 CMR 检查且同时测量主动脉脉搏波速度(PWV)的连续糖尿病患者进行研究。主要终点是主要不良心血管事件(MACE),定义为心脏性死亡、非致死性心肌梗死(MI)、因心力衰竭住院、冠状动脉血运重建(CMR 后>90 天)和缺血性卒中的复合终点。次要终点是硬性心脏事件,定义为心脏性死亡和非致死性 MI 的复合终点。

结果

共纳入 424 例患者(中位随访 7.2 年)。平均 PWV 为 12.16±6.28 m/s。26.8%和 9.4%的患者发生 MACE 和硬性心脏事件。PWV 升高(>12.16 m/s)的患者发生 MACE 的发生率明显更高(HR 2.14 [95%CI 1.48, 3.09],p<0.001)和硬性心脏事件(HR 2.69 [95%CI 1.42, 5.10],p=0.002)高于 PWV 不升高的患者。多变量分析表明,PWV 可独立预测 MACE(p=0.003)和硬性心脏事件(p=0.01)。与临床数据、左心室质量指数、心肌缺血和钆延迟增强相比,PWV 可提供额外的预测价值,可分别提高预测 MACE(附加 χ² 7.54,p=0.006)和硬性心脏事件(附加 χ² 5.99,p=0.01)的能力。

结论

CMR 测量的主动脉僵硬度可独立预测 MACE 和硬性心脏事件,并为疑似心肌缺血的糖尿病患者提供显著的附加预后价值。主动脉僵硬度的测量可能会被考虑作为腺苷负荷灌注 CMR 方案的一部分,以增强糖尿病患者的风险预测。

相似文献

1
Aortic stiffness effectively risk stratifies diabetic patients with suspected myocardial ischemia undergoing vasodilatory stress perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance.主动脉僵硬度可有效对疑似心肌缺血行血管扩张性应激灌注心脏磁共振的糖尿病患者进行危险分层。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2023 Oct 10;23(1):502. doi: 10.1186/s12872-023-03532-0.
2
Prognostic Value of Aortic Stiffness using Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance in The Elderly with Known or Suspected Coronary Artery Disease.用心血管磁共振评估老年已知或疑似冠心病患者的主动脉僵硬程度的预后价值。
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2022 May;118(5):961-971. doi: 10.36660/abc.20210452.
3
Incremental prognostic value of aortic stiffness in addition to myocardial ischemia by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.心脏磁共振成像显示,主动脉僵硬除了心肌缺血以外还有预后价值。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2020 Jun 11;20(1):287. doi: 10.1186/s12872-020-01550-w.
4
Impact of aortic stiffness by velocity-encoded magnetic resonance imaging on late gadolinium enhancement to predict cardiovascular events.通过速度编码磁共振成像评估主动脉僵硬度对钆增强晚期预测心血管事件的影响。
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2020 Sep 25;30:100635. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2020.100635. eCollection 2020 Oct.
5
Prognostic value of combined magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging and late gadolinium enhancement.联合磁共振心肌灌注成像和钆延迟增强的预后价值。
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011 Jun;27(5):705-14. doi: 10.1007/s10554-011-9863-9. Epub 2011 Apr 10.
6
Prognostic Value of Adenosine Stress Perfusion Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Older Adults with Known or Suspected Coronary Artery Disease.腺苷负荷心脏磁共振成像在老年已知或疑似冠心病患者中的预后价值。
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2022 Jul;119(1):97-106. doi: 10.36660/abc.20210530.
7
Imaging of Clinically Unrecognized Myocardial Fibrosis in Patients With Suspected Coronary Artery Disease.疑似冠心病患者临床无症状性心肌纤维化的影像学评估。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Aug 25;76(8):945-957. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.06.063.
8
Global Coronary Flow Reserve Measured During Stress Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging Is an Independent Predictor of Adverse Cardiovascular Events.在应激心脏磁共振成像期间测量的全球冠状动脉血流储备是不良心血管事件的独立预测因子。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Aug;12(8 Pt 2):1686-1695. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.08.018. Epub 2018 Nov 5.
9
Prognostic value of vasodilator stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance after inconclusive stress testing.在应激试验结果不确定的情况下,血管扩张剂负荷灌注心血管磁共振的预后价值。
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2021 Jul 5;23(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s12968-021-00785-6.
10
Long-term prognostic value of stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients without known coronary artery disease.无已知冠状动脉疾病患者应激灌注心血管磁共振的长期预后价值。
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2021 Apr 8;23(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s12968-021-00737-0.

本文引用的文献

1
Standardized image interpretation and post-processing in cardiovascular magnetic resonance - 2020 update : Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR): Board of Trustees Task Force on Standardized Post-Processing.心血管磁共振标准化图像解读和后处理 - 2020 年更新:心血管磁共振学会(SCMR):标准化后处理董事会信托基金工作组。
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2020 Mar 12;22(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s12968-020-00610-6.
2
Standardized cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) protocols: 2020 update.标准化心血管磁共振成像(CMR)协议:2020 年更新。
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2020 Feb 24;22(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s12968-020-00607-1.
3
Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: 2019 Update to the 2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association.
急性缺血性脑卒中患者早期管理指南:2018 年急性缺血性脑卒中早期管理指南的更新:美国心脏协会/美国卒中协会发布的医疗保健专业人员指南。
Stroke. 2019 Dec;50(12):e344-e418. doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000211. Epub 2019 Oct 30.
4
Global and regional diabetes prevalence estimates for 2019 and projections for 2030 and 2045: Results from the International Diabetes Federation Diabetes Atlas, 9 edition.2019 年全球及各区域糖尿病患病率估算值及 2030 年和 2045 年预测值:国际糖尿病联盟糖尿病地图集(第 9 版)的结果。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2019 Nov;157:107843. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2019.107843. Epub 2019 Sep 10.
5
Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction (2018).心肌梗死的第四次全球定义(2018年)。
Circulation. 2018 Nov 13;138(20):e618-e651. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000617.
6
2018 ESC/ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension.2018年欧洲心脏病学会/欧洲高血压学会动脉高血压管理指南。
Eur Heart J. 2018 Sep 1;39(33):3021-3104. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy339.
7
Prevalence of cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes: a systematic literature review of scientific evidence from across the world in 2007-2017.2007-2017 年全球范围内 2 型糖尿病心血管疾病患病率的系统文献回顾。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2018 Jun 8;17(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s12933-018-0728-6.
8
Associations between Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Arterial Stiffness: A Prospective Analysis Based on the Maine-Syracuse Study.2型糖尿病与动脉僵硬度之间的关联:基于缅因州-锡拉丘兹研究的前瞻性分析。
Pulse (Basel). 2018 Mar;5(1-4):88-98. doi: 10.1159/000479560. Epub 2017 Aug 26.
9
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance measures of aortic stiffness in asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes: association with glycaemic control and clinical outcomes.2 型糖尿病无症状患者的主动脉僵硬度的心血管磁共振测量:与血糖控制和临床结局的关系。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2018 Mar 5;17(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s12933-018-0681-4.
10
2017 Cardiovascular and Stroke Endpoint Definitions for Clinical Trials.2017 年临床试验心血管和卒中终点定义。
Circulation. 2018 Feb 27;137(9):961-972. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.033502.