University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL, USA.
University of Denver, Denver, CO, USA.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Dec;25(6):2398-2405. doi: 10.3758/s13423-018-1440-y.
In their review of Uittenhove, Thevenot and Barrouillet (Cognition, 146, 289-303, 2016), Chen and Campbell (Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2017 https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1328-2 ) concluded that existing evidence supports the conventional wisdom that basic non-zero addition combinations are stored and retrieved as discrete facts and that compacted reconstructive strategies play no role in expert mental addition. One aim of the present commentary is to detail why their evidence supporting these conclusions is not unequivocal. A second aim is to delineate key issues that still need to be addressed to build an accurate model of how basic sums are represented and retrieved.
在他们对 Uittenhove、Thevenot 和 Barrouillet(《认知》,146,289-303,2016)的评论中,Chen 和 Campbell(《心理学报与评论》,2017,https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1328-2)得出结论,现有证据支持这样一种传统观点,即基本的非零加法组合被存储和检索为离散的事实,而紧凑的重构策略在专家心理加法中不起作用。本评论的一个目的是详细说明为什么他们支持这些结论的证据并非无可置疑。第二个目的是阐明仍需要解决的关键问题,以构建关于基本和的表示和检索方式的准确模型。